—  SPECIALTY CONFERENCE  —

Gastrointestinal Pathology

Case 3 - Gastric Adenocarcinoma; Poorly Differentiated, Tubular (WHO Classification) with HER-2 High Amplification and Heterogeneity

Priyanthi Kumarasinghe, PathWest, Queen Elizabeth II Medical Centre, Perth, Australia





Click on slide thumbnail images for an enlarged view.

If you have any difficulties viewing these slides, email the webmaster.



Clinical History
A 65 year old male underwent a total gastrectomy. A previous endoscopic biopsy showed a poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma. Her-2 status was assessed.


Case 3 - Figure 1
Scanning magnification of the carcinoma

Case 3 - Figure 2
Invasive adenocarcinoma with overlying high grade dysplasia

Case 3 - Figure 3
Low power picture of the poorly differentiated areas of the tumour

Case 3 - Figure 4
Poorly differentiated solid growth pattern

Case 3 - Figure 5
HER-2 protein expression of the area shown in figure 3 demonstrating marked heterogeneity

Case 3 - Figure 6
HER2 immunohistochemical expression of the dysplastic epithelium and invasive carcinoma in contrast to the negative non-neoplastic tissue

Case 3 - Figure 7
HER-2 protein expression in the area shown in figure 2 that includes dysplastic and invasive areas

Case 3 - Figure 8
HER-2 protein expression, scored as 3+ according to Hoffman et al

Case 3 - Figure 9
HER-2 protein expression in vascular emboli

Case 3 - Figure 10
HER-2 gene amplification with Silver In- Situ Hybridisation (SISH); tumour cells show high amplification

Introduction:
Over expression of HER-2 has been documented in 6.8 – 34% of gastric carcinomas including gastro-oesophageal junctional (GOJ) tumours with most studies documenting values between 15-25%. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5] The incidence of gastric cancer has declined in Western countries over the past 50 years, however it appears that the incidence of GOJ cancer is increasing. [6, 7]. HER2 over expression and/or gene amplification has been shown to be a significant negative prognostic factor for GC. [8, 9] Furthermore, targeting HER2 with Herceptin® (trastuzumab), a monoclonal antibody directed against HER2 has been shown to inhibit tumour cell growth in vitro and in vivo. [9, 10, 11] The first randomised clinical trial (ToGA) investigating the role for trastuzumab in advanced gastric carcinoma reported a significant improvement in the median overall survival with trastuzumab in combination with chemotherapy, compared to chemotherapy alone (13.8 vs 11.1 months; HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.60, 0.91; p=0.0046). [12] Exploratory subgroup analysis suggested that in patients with the highest levels of HER2 protein expression (IHC2+/FISH+ or IHC3+), the survival benefit with trastuzumab was further increased compared to chemotherapy alone (16.0 vs 11.8 months). [12] This combination approach is the first to show an increase in median survival beyond one year. As a result, trastuzumab has recently been formally approved in some countries (European Union and Australia) for the treatment of metastatic HER-2 positive gastric carcinoma. Since HER-2 overexpression/amplification is key to determine the eligibility for treatment there is a need to accurately identify HER-2 status of gastric cancer. Standard validated methodologies in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumour samples used globally are immunohistochemistry (IHC) to detect HER2 protein over expression and in situ hybridisation (ISH) to identify HER2 gene amplification. Judging by the experience of HER-2 testing for breast carcinoma it is clear that a valid testing algorithm needs to be used for gastric HER-2 testing. This is even more important as there are significant differences in the patho-biology, diagnosis and management of gastric carcinoma compared to breast carcinoma.

Pathological/Microscopic Findings and any Immunohistochemical or Other Studies:
Sections were of a malignant ulcer in the antrum from a partial gastrectomy specimen. They showed a poorly differentiated gastric adenocarcinoma (figures 1-4). The tumour consisted of a minor component of tubular/glandular structures (figure 2) with a major component of poorly differentiated carcinoma featuring solid islands of poorly differentiated malignant cells are (figure 4). There was no classic signet ring cell or poorly cohesive components. Glandular structures were complex and lined by pleomorphic epithelial cells with large irregular nuclei and contained scant to moderate amounts of eosinophilic cytoplasm. Immunoprofile was as expected for gastric adenocarcinoma; neuroendocrine markers were negative. There were also areas of high grade dysplasia (figure 2). Immunohistochemical stains for HER-2 protein expression (Cerb-B2, polyclonal antibody) showed strong membranous positivity in a heterogeneous pattern in the invasive component (figures 5-9). In addition the dysplastic areas (figure 7) and some but not all vascular emboli (figure 9) showed strong 3+ positivity. Protein expression was scored as 3+ (figure 8) according to criteria recommended by Hoffman et al, modified from those used for breast carcinoma.1 The degree of heterogeneity varied from 30-80% (figures 5 & 6). HER-2 gene amplification by silver in-situ hybridisation (SISH; Ventana INFORM HER 2) demonstrated high amplification (figure 10). The average count of HER2 copy numbers was 25. Chromosome 17 analysis showed an average count of 2.5. HER-2/Cep 17 ratio was 10. This patient had a preoperative endoscopic biopsy that showed poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma. The biopsy was negative for Her-2 over expression/amplification both by IHC and SISH. There were 4 biopsy fragments examined with all 4 featuring tumour occupying approximately 60% of the biopsy volume.

Differential Diagnoses:
Gastric adenocarcinoma; poorly differentiated, tubular (WHO classification) with HER-2 high amplification and heterogeneity

Final Diagnosis:
Gastric adenocarcinoma; poorly differentiated, tubular (WHO classification) with HER-2 high amplification and heterogeneity

Case Discussion:
The location of the adenocarcinoma was in the antrum. The carcinoma showed glandular/tubular structures with a poorly differentiated component. There was evidence of high grade dysplasia and chronic gastritis with focal intestinal metaplasia in the non-neoplastic/non-dysplastic gastric mucosa. The preoperative endoscopic biopsy showed an adenocarcinoma with poorly differentiated solid areas together with glandular/tubular differentiation. There were no dysplastic areas. Importantly both immunohistochemistry and gene amplification studies were negative for HER2 over- expression/amplification. This case illustrates significant heterogeneity of HER-2 expression in gastric carcinoma that could result in a negative test in biopsy. This was in spite of strong protein expression and high amplification as demonstrated with IHC and ISH studies in the resection specimen. The focus of this case is to highlight tissue of HER2 over expression/amplification in gastric carcinoma and the issues related to interpretation of test results, heterogeneity and concomitant HER-2 expression in dysplastic areas. The implications when the biopsies are tested to identify the patients who are eligible for a Herceptin treatment are also discussed.

Review of the Literature/Treatment Options (if applicable):
HER2 over expression/amplification in gastric carcinoma and implications: Over expression of HER-2 has been documented in 6.8 – 34% of gastric and gastro-oesophageal junctional adenocarcinomas. Lower rates have been reported in tissue microarray based studies [3, 4]. Positivity rate is higher in "intestinal" than diffuse cancers and gastro-oesophageal junctional than distal gastric cancers [1, 5, 9, 12]. There is no clear-cut explanation thus so far for these differences. It is known that in breast cancer HER2 gene amplification almost invariably induces and occurs before HER2 protein over-expression on the tumor cell surface [13, 14]. Interestingly a significant number of IHC 2+ cases were shown to be consistently HER 2 amplified; (Hoffmann et al - 35.7% , ToGA - 54.6% and Lee et al 35.3%) [1, 5, 12]. HER2-positive status in gastric cancer also appears to be associated with poorer prognosis, more aggressive disease, and shorter survival. Preclinical studies have indicated that trastuzumab exerts antitumor activity in HER2- overexpressing human gastric cell lines and xenograft models [9, 11]. Trastuzumab with chemotherapy treatment combination is the first to show an increase in median survival beyond one year as shown in the ToGA results. As such HER2 status is predictive of patients that are most likely to benefit from trastuzumab therapy. The survival advantage was noted to be greater in patients with high expression of HER-2 (IHC 2+ and FISH +, or IHC 3+) than in those with low expression (IHC 0 or 1+ and FISH +), 16.0 months vs 11.8 months respectively [12]. As such the case illustrated here is likely to benefit from Herceptin treatment on the basis of available evidence. Testing for HER2 over-expression/amplification: Standard validated methodologies in formalin-fixed paraffin- embedded tumour samples used worldwide are immunohistochemistry (IHC) to detect HER2 protein over expression and in situ hybridisation (ISH) to identify HER2 gene amplification. HER2 over expression and gene amplification in GC appears to differ from that in breast cancer in many ways. This was demonstrated by Hoffmann et al in their study. They showed when breast scoring criteria were applied 11 of 29 gastric carcinoma that were amplified with FISH were equivocal or negative for immunohistochemistry. The reasons cited were <10%, incomplete and moderate IHC expression being interpreted as IHC 0,1+, 2+ and 0 respectively. As such they recommended that moderate and incomplete (basolateral) membranous staining pattern to be considered IHC3+ for gastric cancers (Table 1). They also recommend that any number of tumour cells (not >10%) in biopsy material to be considered positive (Table 1). A cluster may be defined as a collection of 3-5 cells. Others also have shown similar experiences of under calling of truly amplified cases if breast scoring criteria are used for gastric cancer [15, 16] Studies show excellent correlation between IHC 3+ and gene amplification [1, 5, 12]. Additionally it has been noted by some that there is excellent correlation between IHC 0 and 1+ (negative) and non-amplification with ISH but only moderate agreement for IHC 2+ cases [1, 5]. ToGA study used the previously validated modified IHC scoring criteria [1, 12]. The results showed that 4.9%, 15.7%, 54.6% and 94.9% gastric carcinomas that showed IHC0, 1+, 2+ and 3+ respectively were amplified with FISH. The possible reasons for the differences include inherent heterogeneity of gastric carcinoma and issues related to sample selection and perhaps tissue fixation. ToGA trial included cases that were tested both on biopsies and resections. Tissue fixation is well known affect protein expression in tumours else where [17]. HER2 over expression/amplification in gastric carcinoma and implications: Over expression of HER-2 has been documented in 6.8 – 34% of gastric and gastro-oesophageal junctional adenocarcinomas. Lower rates have been reported in tissue microarray based studies [3, 4] Positivity rate is higher in "intestinal" than diffuse cancers and gastro-oesophageal junctional than distal gastric cancers [1, 5, 9, 12]. There is no clear-cut explanation thus so far for these differences. It is known that in breast cancer HER2 gene amplification almost invariably induces and occurs before HER2 protein over-expression on the tumor cell surface [13, 14]. Interestingly a significant number of IHC 2+ cases were shown to be consistently HER 2 amplified; (Hoffmann et al - 35.7% , ToGA - 54.6% and Lee et al 35.3%) [1, 5, 12]. HER2-positive status in gastric cancer also appears to be associated with poorer prognosis, more aggressive disease, and shorter survival. Preclinical studies have indicated that trastuzumab exerts antitumor activity in HER2- overexpressing human gastric cell lines and xenograft models [9, 11]. Trastuzumab with chemotherapy treatment combination is the first to show an increase in median survival beyond one year as shown in the ToGA results. As such HER2 status is predictive of patients that are most likely to benefit from trastuzumab therapy. The survival advantage was noted to be greater in patients with high expression of HER-2 (IHC 2+ and FISH +, or IHC 3+) than in those with low expression (IHC 0 or 1+ and FISH +), 16.0 months vs 11.8 months respectively [12] As such the case illustrated here is likely to benefit from Herceptin treatment on the basis of available evidence. Testing for HER2 over-expression/amplification: Standard validated methodologies in formalin-fixed paraffin- embedded tumour samples used worldwide are immunohistochemistry (IHC) to detect HER2 protein over expression and in situ hybridisation (ISH) to identify HER2 gene amplification. HER2 over expression and gene amplification in GC appears to differ from that in breast cancer in many ways. This was demonstrated by Hoffmann et al in their study. They showed when breast scoring criteria were applied 11 of 29 gastric carcinoma that were amplified with FISH were equivocal or negative for immunohistochemistry. The reasons cited were <10%, incomplete and moderate IHC expression being interpreted as IHC 0,1+, 2+ and 0 respectively. As such they recommended that moderate and incomplete (basolateral) membranous staining pattern to be considered IHC3+ for gastric cancers (Table 1). They also recommend that any number of tumour cells (not >10%) in biopsy material to be considered positive (Table 1). A cluster may be defined as a collection of 3-5 cells. Others also have shown similar experiences of under calling of truly amplified cases if breast scoring criteria are used for gastric cancer [15, 16]. Studies show excellent correlation between IHC 3+ and gene amplification [1, 5, 12]. Additionally it has been noted by some that there is excellent correlation between IHC 0 and 1+ (negative) and non-amplification with ISH but only moderate agreement for IHC 2+ cases [1, 5]. ToGA study used the previously validated modified IHC scoring criteria [1, 12]. The results showed that 4.9%, 15.7%, 54.6% and 94.9% gastric carcinomas that showed IHC0, 1+, 2+ and 3+ respectively were amplified with FISH. The possible reasons for the differences include inherent heterogeneity of gastric carcinoma and issues related to sample selection and perhaps tissue fixation. ToGA trial included cases that were tested both on biopsies and resections. Tissue fixation is well known affect protein expression in tumours else where [17] In this background when the European board, EMEA, approved trastuzumab for the treatment of metastatic adenocarcinomas of the stomach and GOJ immunohistochemistry was determined to be the method of choice to determine HER2 status [18]. ISH was restricted to those cases that have equivocal (IHC2+) HER2 expression. In Australia, HER2 testing for eligibility for trastuzumab therapy in breast cancer is done via a national diagnostic testing program based on either chromogenic ISH (CISH) or silver ISH (SISH), with fluorescence ISH (FISH) in equivocal cases. This is due to false positive and false negative rates documented with IHC. A similar national approach is underway for gastric HER-2 testing. Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) in Australia approved Trastuzumab for the treatment of advanced gastric and GOJ cancers for those patients whose tumours are HER2 positive; positive HER-2 status is defined by IHC 3+ expression or SISH positivity for those who are IHC less than 3+ [19]. A gastric cancer HER-2 testing study (GaTHER study) was conducted to evaluate the testing methods and to determine the inter-laboratory reproducibility of HER2 scoring across 9 Australian reference laboratories. Heterogeneity of gastric carcinoma: The issue of heterogeneity of HER-2 over-expression is less well documented in gastric carcinoma compared to breast carcinoma [1, 4, 5, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24]. Hoffman et al, Grabsch et al, Bilious et al and Lee et al have demonstrated or noted significant tumour heterogeneity ranging from 4.8%-50% strongly supporting modified scoring for gastric IHC interpretation [1, 4, 5, 24]. However heterogeneity has not been formally defined except in the study by Lee et al in which the tumour was determined to be heterogeneous if less than 2/3 of the tumour stained positive for IHC. In the same study it was noted that there was excellent correlation between protein expression and amplification in heterogeneous clones. Marx et al have reported conflicting results stating homogeneity of HER-2 amplification in gastric carcinoma; the major draw back in this study is that they based their observations on a tissue microarray [23] As demonstrated in this case of highly amplified gastric carcinoma with negative endoscopic biopsies, it is likely that tumour heterogeneity has significant implications on HER-2 testing. It is anticipated that much of the testing be done on endoscopic biopsies in clinically advanced gastric carcinoma. Extensive sampling should be specifically encouraged by the endoscopist if HER2 testing is anticipated to be performed on biopsies. This is often the situation if there's clinical concern of advanced gastric carcinoma and further surgery is unlikely. The endoscopic biopsies of this case had 4 fragments with all showing carcinoma and the total tumour volume approximating 60% of the biopsy volume. In the gastrectomy sections heterogeneity ranged from 30-80% when tested in 3 blocks. Currently there are no formal recommendations with respect to the number of biopsies be sampled at endoscopy or block selection in resected specimens for HER2 testing. In gastrectomy specimens, it may be prudent to analyse more than one representative tumour block. Biopsies on the other hand may be better preserved than the resections if the latter are not properly and timely fixed. The clinical significance of heterogeneous HER-2 staining in gastric carcinoma with respect to response to trastuzumab therapy is yet to be ascertained although one would speculate that only the HER-2 positive clones would be sensitive. HER2 over-expression/amplification in gastric epithelial dysplasia: Interpretation problems associated with the distinction between intramucosal and invasive carcinoma and the terminology issues between the "West" and the "East" have not reached agreement globally. In this background it is important to evaluate and correlate HER-2 over expression/amplification in gastric epithelial dysplasia. Lee et al recorded that in some cases HER2 positivity was noted in the dysplastic epithelium while the carcinomatous/invasive component was negative [5]. This may have implications for false-positive results in relation to invasive carcinoma. Further more the clinical significance and therapeutic implications of positivity in dysplasia and not in the concomitant carcinoma is uncertain currently. Practical difficulties may also be encountered in assigning HER-2 status in cases where areas of high-grade dysplasia appear to be merging with invasive carcinoma, especially in biopsies. Currently there are no other studies that document the issue of HER2 over expression in gastric epithelial dysplasia. Over expression/amplification in gastric high-grade dysplasia is a novel finding suggesting a role in pathogenesis and a possible role as a diagnostic biomarker for gastric dysplasia. Other issues: Issues relating to testing on archival material, fixation, spurious protein expression in reactive epithelium and intestinal metaplasia, and inherent problems of small biopsy artefacts have been mentioned but not formally addressed. Lack of universal agreement for criteria of invasion and dysplasia and concept of gastric adenomas together with the relative lack of experience of gastric cancer HER-2 testing in these early stages are likely to have implications for comparing data worldwide. This also supports the notion of many that central testing should be encouraged in the interim until the critical issues are addressed. This is in the background of therapeutic and financial implications to correctly identify the "intent to treat" group. Treatment options: Currently Herceptin treatment is formally approved for advanced gastric and GOJ carcinoma in several countries based on the results shown in the landmark ToGA trial. The efficacy in "non-advanced" carcinomas is currently unknown.

HER2 scoring criteria in gastric cancer

Surgical specimen - staining pattern Biopsy specimen - staining pattern Score HER2 over expression assessment
No reactivity or membranous reactivity in <10% of tumour cells No reactivity or no membranous reactivity in any tumour cell 0 Negative
Faint/barely perceptible membranous reactivity in ? 10% of tumour cells; cells are reactive only in part of their membrane Tumour cell cluster with a faint/barely perceptible membranous reactivity irrespective of percentage of tumour cells stained1+Negative
Weak to moderate complete, basolateral or lateral membranous reactivity in ? 10% of tumour cellsTumour cell cluster with a weak to moderate complete, basolateral or lateral membranous reactivity irrespective of percentage of tumour cells stained2+Equivocal
Strong complete, basolateral or lateral membranous reactivity in ? 10% of tumour cellsTumour cell cluster with a strong complete, basolateral or lateral membranous reactivity irrespective of percentage of tumour cells stained3+Positive

Conclusion(s):
  • Tratuzumab is the first biological to show survival benefit in patients with advanced, recurrent and metastatic gastric and gastro-oesophageal junctional adenocarcinoma.

  • HER2 status of the tumour is a predictor of response to chemotherapy that combines Tratuzumab.

  • Accurate testing is possible with appropriate use of test methods that include immunohistochemistry and in-situ hybridisation techniques. Strong 3+ protein expression correlates well with gene amplification while less than 3+ protein expression needs a second test with ISH.

  • Heterogeneity, amplification in dysplastic epithelium, lack of experience in testing are confounding factors that may result in false-positive and false negative results. Hence in the interim central/reference lab testing for HER 2 status is encouraged.

  • Whether heterogeneity and high versus low amplification would have an impact on response to therapy needs further evaluation.

  • Over expression/amplification of HER2 in gastric dysplasia may have a possible role in the pathogenesis and diagnosis.

References:
  1. Hofmann M, Stoss O, Shi D, et al. Assessment of a HER- 2 scoring system for gastric cancer: results from a validating study. Histopathol 2008; 52:797-805

  2. Gravalos C, Jimeno A. Her2 in gastric cancer: a new prognostic factor and a novel therapeutic target. Ann Oncol 2008; 19:523-9.

  3. Yan B, Ee XY, Omar SSB, Salto-Tellez M. HER2 gene amplification and protein expression in gastric cancer. J Clin Pathol 2010; 63: 839- 842

  4. Grabsch H, Sivakumar S, Gray S, Gabbert HE, Muller W. HER2 expression in gastric cancer: rare, heterogeneous and of no prognostic value – conclusions from 924 cases of two independent series. Cell Oncol 2010; 32 (1-2): 57-65

  5. Lee S, de Boer WB, Fermoyle S, Platten M, Kumarasinghe MP. HER-2 testing in gastric carcinoma: issues related to heterogeneity in biopsies and resections. Histopathology (accepted for publication)

  6. Gaca JG, Petersen RP, Peterson BL et al. Pathologic nodal status predicts disease-free survival after neoadjuvant chemoradiation for gastroesophageal junction carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2006 Mar; 13(3):340-6.

  7. Kusano C, Gotoda T, Khor C. Changing trends in the proportion of adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction in a large tertiary referral center in Japan. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol 2008; 23: 1662–5.

  8. García I, Vizoso F, Martín A, Sanz L, Abdel-Lah O, Raigoso P, García-Muñiz JL. Clinical Significance of the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor and HER2 Receptor in resectable gastric cancer. Annals of Surgical Oncology 2003; 10(3):234–24

  9. Tanner M ET AL. Amplification of HER-2 in gastric carcinoma: association with topoisomerase IIalpha gene amplification, intestinal type, poor prognosis and sensitivity to trastuzumab. Ann Oncol 2005; 16:273–278

  10. Matsui Y et al. Suppression of tumor growth in human gastric cancer with HER2 over expression by an anti-HER2 antibody in a murine model. Int J Oncol 2005; 27:681–685

  11. Fujimoto-Ouchi K et al. Antitumor activity of trastuzumab in combination with chemotherapy in human gastric cancer xenograft models. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 2007; 59:795–805

  12. Bang Y-J, Van Cutsem E, Feyeereislova A, et al. Tratuzumab in combination with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for treatment of HER2-positive advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer (ToGA): a phase 3, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2010; 376:687-97

  13. Simon R, Nocito A, Hübscher T, Bucher C, Torhorst J, Schraml P, Bubendorf L, Mihatsch MM, Moch H, Wilber K, Schötzau A, Kononen J, Sauter G. Patterns of her-2/neu amplification and over expression in primary and metastatic breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2001; 93:1141–1146

  14. Vincent-Salomon A, Pierga JY, Couturier J, d'Enghien CD, Nos C,Sigal-Zafrani B, Lae M, Fréneaux P, Diéras V, Thiéry JP, Sastre- Garau X. HER2 status of bone marrow micrometastasis and their corresponding primary tumours in a pilot study of 27 cases: a possible tool for anti-HER2 therapy management? Br J Cancer 2007; 96:654–659

  15. Barros-Silva JD, Leitão D, Afonso L, Vieira J, Dinis- Ribeiro M, Fragoso M, Bento MJ, Santos L, Ferreira P, Rêgo S, Brandão C, Carneiro F, Lopes C, Schmitt F, Teixeira MR. Association of ERBB2 gene status with histopathological parameters and disease-specific survival in gastric carcinoma patients. Br J Cancer2009;100:487–493

  16. Tapia C, Glatz K, Novotny H, Lugli A, Horcic M, Seemayer CA, Tornillo L, Terracciano L, Spichtin H, Mirlacher M, Simon R, Sauter G. Close association between HER-2 amplification and over expression in human tumours of non-breast origin. Mod Pathol 2007; 20:192–198

  17. Kumarasinghe AP, de Boer WB, Bateman AC, Kumarasinghe MP. DNA mismatch repair enzyme immunohistochemistry in colorectal cancer: a comparison of biopsy and resection material. Pathology 2010; 42(5):414-420

  18. http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/EPAR _- Assessment_Report_- _Variation/human/000278/WC500074921.pdf

  19. https://www.ebs.tga.gov.au/ebs/picmi/picmirepository.nsf/ PICMI?OpenForm&t=&q=herceptin&r=/

  20. Cottu PH Asselah J, Lae M, et al. Intratumoral heterogeneity of HE/2neu expression and its consequences for the management of advanced breast cancer. Ann Oncol 2008; 19:596-7

  21. Brunelli M, Manfrin E, Martignoni G, et al. Genotypic intratumoral heterogeneity of in breast carcinoma with HER2/neu amplification. Am J Clin Pathol 2009; 131:678-682

  22. Wu JM, Halushka MK, Argani P, Intratumoral heterogeneity of HER-2 gene amplification and protein over expression in breast cancer. Hum Pathol 2010; 41: 914-7

  23. Marx AH, Tharun L, Muth J, et al. Her-2 amplification is highly homogenous in gastric carcinoma. Hum Pathol 2009; 40:769-777

  24. Bilious M, Osamura RY, Rushcoff J, et al. Her-2 amplification is highly homogenous in gastric carcinoma (comment). Hum Pathol 2010;41:304-5