Case 3 -

Coccidioides Spp. Infection Associated with Eosinophilic Pneumonia Frank Schneider, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA

Virtual Slides as well as Still Images are displayed below.
For the fastest viewing of virtual slides, click:



under each thumbnail image below. You must have Aperio ImageScope installed on your PC.

If you do not already have Aperio ImageScope, Windows users with administrator privileges may download and install a free version in order to view USCAP Virtual Slides. Click the icon on the right to get your free copy:

Or, click on slide thumbnail images to view each slide
in a Web-based slide viewer, which is somewhat slower.

If you have any difficulties viewing these slides, email or call George Clay at +1.724.449.1137.

Clinical History A 26-year-old man presented to an emergency room in Pittsburgh, PA, with a 10-day history of worsening shortness of breath, productive cough and fatigue. He was admitted and treated with azithromycin and ampicillin for presumed community-acquired pneumonia. Despite antibiotic therapy he continued to remain febrile with persistent leukocytosis (eosinophilia) and increasing supplemental oxygen requirements eventually requiring intubation. A chest CT showed extensive, bulky mediastinal lymphadenopathy and a dense airspace consolidation within the right upper lobe with small cavitation. In addition, there were innumerable widespread centrilobular nodules. A bronchoalveolar lavage showed atypical lymphoid cells with 20 percent eosinophils. At the same time the present transbronchial biopsy was obtained. Case 3 - Slide 1 Click to view with ImageScope Click to view with a Web-Based Viewer Case 3 - Figure 1 Airspaces filled with fibrin, macrophages, a single giant cell and scattered inflammatory cells (H&E x100). Case 3 - Figure 2 Foamy histiocytes and fibrin in alveoli.Mononuclear inflammatory cells form a loose aggregate (H&E x200). Case 3 - Figure 3 Macrophages and a multinucleated giant cell. Eosinophils are present within the airspace exudate and in alveolar septa (H&E x200). Case 3 - Figure 4 Spherical structures within the vaguely granulomatous aggregate of airspace macrophages (center and edge of biopsy at 1 o'clock) (H&E x400). Case 3 - Figure 5 A spherical fungal organism with refractile wall and poorly defined internal structure (H&E x400). Case 3 - Figure 6 Two fungal organisms highlighted by a silver stain. The one in the lower left appears to contain some internal structures displacing the stain (Grocott methenamine silver x400). Case 3 - Figure 7 The wall of the organisms is highlighted by a PAS stain (PAS x400). Case 3 - Figure 8 A mucin stain fails to highlight a mucinous capsule around the organisms (Mucicarmine x400). Case 3 - Figure 9 Chest CT showing right upper lobe airspace consolidation with cavitation and innumerable small centrilobular nodules. Introduction: A 26-year-old man presented to an emergency room in Pittsburgh with a 10-day history of worsening shortness of breath, productive cough and fatigue. He was admitted and treated with azithromycin and ampicillin for presumed community-acquired pneumonia. Despite antibiotic therapy he continued to remain febrile with persistent leukocytosis (eosinophilia) and increasing supplemental oxygen requirements eventually requiring intubation. A chest CT showed extensive, bulky mediastinal lymphadenopathy and a dense airspace consolidation within the right upper lobe with small cavitation. In addition, there were innumerable widespread centrilobular nodules. A bronchoalveolar lavage showed atypical lymphoid cells with 20 percent eosinophils. At the same time the present transbronchial biopsy was obtained. Pathological/Microscopic Findings and any Immunohistochemical or Other Studies: Routine sections show an eosinophilic pneumonia characterized by fibrinous airspace exudates with macrophages and eosinophils. The macrophages aggregate to form vaguely formed granulomas and rare giant cells. Within the alveolar exudates, one can identify rare spherical structures approximately 10-15 micrometer in diameter. The most prominent one has a thick, refractile wall. Some are surrounded by small neutrophilic microabscesses. No budding is seen. There is no evidence of a lymphoproliferative process. Grocott stains highlight the spherical structures. One seems to have a hardly discernible internal structure (Figure 6, lower left). Mucicarmine and Alcian Blue stains fail to highlight mucin. A Fontana stain is negative. Immunohistochemical stains for several lymphoid markers confirmed the absence of a lymphoproliferative process. Differential Diagnoses: Eosinophilic pneumonia and its various associations as outlined in the discussion. Fungal infection, especially Coccidioides, Blastomyces, Cryptococcus spp. Aspiration Final Diagnosis: Coccidioides spp. infection associated with eosinophilic pneumonia. Discussion Case Discussion: This case offers the clinical consultant pathologist the opportunity to integrate morphologic, radiographic and clinical findings. The case can be approached from three different angles: (1) the clinical presentation as acute onset of respiratory symptoms in a young man with no significant other medical history, (2) the radiographic findings of centrilobular nodules with cavitation associated with airspace consolidation and mediastinal lymphadenopathy, and (3) the histologic finding of eosinophilic pneumonia with structures resembling fungal yeast forms. From a clinical perspective, acute onset respiratory distress in a younger individual can have several etiologies [1]. Entities to be considered include pneumonia, diffuse alveolar hemorrhage, acute eosinophilic pneumonia, acute hypersensitivity pneumonia, cryptogenic (or idiopathic) organizing pneumonia, a rapidly infiltrative neoplastic process such as leukemia or other cancers, pulmonary edema, and acute interstitial pneumonia (AIP). Adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), whose morphologic correlate (diffuse alveolar damage) is often indistinguishable from AIP, is a diagnosis of exclusion. If a biopsy has been obtained, a diagnosis of ARDS is appropriate only if the pathologist cannot identify any of the processes above. The radiographic findings in this patient highlight different anatomic compartments. Centrilobular nodules indicate an involvement of the bronchovascular bundles and can be seen in respiratory, cellular or follicular bronchiolitis, hypersensitivity pneumonia, sarcoidosis or Langerhans cell histiocytosis [2]. Airspace consolidation usually occurs when alveolar gas is replaced by something else [3]. This "something else" could be edema fluid, pus, blood, surfactant, macrophages, or other cells. Cavities in lung tissue can be the result of necrosis or cystic dilation of an anatomic lung structure. Their presence raise the possibility of infection, malignancy, rheumatologic disease (e.g. Sjögren syndrome), Langerhans cell histiocytosis, pulmonary embolism or infarction [4]. Histologically, eosinophilic lung disease can either be the primary manifestation of disease (simple pulmonary eosinophilia (Löffler Syndrome), idiopathic acute or chronic eosinophilic pneumonia, allergic reactions to cigarette smoke or drugs) or a secondary feature of an underlying condition [5]. Some entities associated with pulmonary eosinophilia can usually be excluded based on the clinical history. For example, the absence of muscle, joint or bowel symptoms helps to exclude eosinophilic lung disease secondary to rheumatoid arthritis, eosinophilic gastroenteritis, or inflammatory bowel disease. Absence of asthma makes Churg-Strauss syndrome an unlikely diagnosis. Peripheral blood eosinophilia, present in this patient, is regularly found in simple pulmonary eosinophilia (Löffler Syndrome), hypereosinophilic syndrome, infectious processes (including fungal and parasitic infections such as filariasis) and chronic eosinophilic pneumonia. Both Löffler Syndrome and chronic eosinophilic pneumonia do not fit the clinical presentation with severe symptoms and rapid onset of disease. One is left with a differential diagnosis including idiopathic acute eosinophilic pneumonia, infection, allergic reactions (e.g. to drugs or cigarette smoke) and eosinophilic airways disease (allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis, bronchocentric granulomatosis). If there were no identifiable organisms in the present biopsy material, it may be most appropriate to offer this differential diagnosis in the pathology report. Taking into account the differential diagnoses from all three of the approaches outlined above, an infectious etiology appears to be the most likely cause for the patient's presentation. The presence of fungal organisms indeed allowed for placing the case into the infectious disease category. Identification of fungal organisms in tissue rests mostly on size and shape. Common (and not so common) fungal species affecting the lung, their morphologic characteristics and differential diagnoses (DD) are listed below. Aspergillus spp. Hyphae, 3-6 micrometer wide Branching at 45 angles Alveolar hemorrhage and fibrin with necrotic alveolar septa Mucoraceae (Mucor, Rhizopus, Absidia spp.): Hyphae, 10-15 micrometer wide Branching at 90 angles Hemorrhagic infarction with sparse or absent inflammatory infiltrate DD: broader hyphae and wider angle branching than Aspergillus spp. Pseudoallescheria boydii Hyphae, 2-5 micrometer with rounded ends Necrosis and acute inflammation DD: Aspergillus spp., usually needs culture confirmation Torulopsis glabrata Yeasts, 2-4 micrometer Necrosis and acute inflammation DD: resembles Candida spp., but does not form pseudohyphae Candida spp. Yeasts, pseudohyphae, both 3-5 micrometer Small necrotic areas with varying acute inflammation Pneumocystis jirovecii Cysts, 4-5 micrometer Alveolar foamy casts with macrophages, reactive pneumocytes and interstitial lymphoplasmacytic infiltrate Cryptococcus neoformans Yeasts, 2-15 micrometer Mucinous capsule Granulomas with or without necrosis in immunocompetent patients, conspicuous lack of response in immunocompromised patients DD: unencapsulated organisms can be mistaken for Histoplasma capsulatum Histoplasma capsulatum Yeasts, 2-4 micrometer Narrow-based budding Necrotizing granulomas with fibrotic wall, scattered giant cells and mixed chronic inflammation Endemic areas: Mississippi and Ohio River valleys Blastomyces dermatitides Yeasts, 8-15 micrometer Thick, refractile wall Broad-based budding Microabscesses with necrotic neutrophils and organisms surrounded by palisading histiocytes Endemic area: Southern, south central and Great Lakes region of the United States, but cases outside these areas not unusual Coccidioides immitis and posadasii Yeasts (spherules), up to 40-60 micrometer, containing endospores up to 5 micrometer Fibroinflammatory exudates with neutrophils and macrophages, necrotizing granulomas Endemic areas: Arizona, New Mexico, Utah (all C. posadasii), Southern California (C. immitis) DD: small immature spherules can mimic Pneumocystis, Histoplasma or Candida spp.; medium-sized spherules can mimic Blastomyces or Cryptococcus spp. Paracoccidioides brasiliensis Yeast, 4-40 micrometer Multiple narrow-based buds (Mariner's wheel morphology) Endemic area: South America The size of the organisms in this case (10-15 micrometer) places them into the range of Blastomyces dermatitidis or small Coccidioides spp. Although a refractile capsule (Fig. 5) is characteristic for Blastomyces, a diagnosis of Blastomyces should only be made on morphologic grounds if the typical broad-based budding is seen. In addition, the barely visible internal structures in one of the spherules support the presence of endospores and a diagnosis of Coccidioidomycosis. While peripheral blood eosinophilia is not uncommon in Coccidioides infection, infiltrative eosinophilic lung disease, as seen in this patient, is rare [6]. Negative mucin and Alcian Blue stains confirm the absence of a mucinous capsule. This and the negative Fontana stain argue against a diagnosis of Cryptococcus spp. Although foreign material (e.g. seeds of beans or peas) can rarely resemble spherules of Coccidioides spp., a diagnosis of aspiration did not fit well with the imaging findings. Cultures confirmed the presence of Coccidioides spp. 10 days after the biopsy was obtained. A morphological iagnosis of fungal infection was made the day following the biopsy, allowing the patient to start antifungal treatment. He recovered fully and was discharged home 19 days after he presented to the Emergency Room. Review of the Literature/Treatment Options: Coccidioidomycosis is contracted by inhalation of arthroconidia usually contained in dusty soil [7, 8]. The disease is subclinical in most patients. In the majority of the remainder it presents either as subacute "Valley fever" that lingers for weeks or months and then regresses, often without therapy, or as community-acquired pneumonia between 1 and 3 weeks after exposure [9]. Serologies are useful in establishing the diagnosis, and repeated serologic testing is useful even if earlier attempts were negative [10]. A PCR-based test has been shown to have high sensitivity, but less so in paraffin-embedded tissue [11]. Culturing the organisms can take several days to weeks and carries the risk of exposure to laboratory personnel to airborne infectious arthroconidia. Uncomplicated cases of coccidioidomycosis are expected to resolve without antifungal therapy. If treatment is desired, the drugs of choice are azole antifungals. Amphotericin B will usually only be considered in most severe cases. Duration of treatment is several months because of the risk of relapse [7]. Conclusions: Acute pulmonary coccidioidomycosis can rarely present as eosinophilic pneumonia. An infectious etiology should be ruled out carefully when seeing this pattern of lung disease. Immature Coccidioides spherules can be small and lack visible endospores, causing confusion with Blastomyces or Cryptococcus spp. Morphologic diagnosis of the organisms can be very valuable to the clinical team as it usually precedes availability of culture results by several days if not weeks. Considering the clinical presentation and radiographic features of patients for whom only limited biopsy material is available may help the pathologist to narrow down the differential diagnosis. References: Schwarz MI, Albert RK. "Imitators" of the ARDS: implications for diagnosis and treatment. Chest 2004; 125:1530-35. Gruden JF, Webb WR, Warnock M. Centrilobular opacities in the lung on high-resolution CT: diagnostic considerations and pathologic correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1994;162(3): 569-74. Webb WR. Thin-section CT of the secondary pulmonary lobule: anatomy and the image - the 2004 Fleischner lecture. Radiology 2006; 239:322-38. Gadkowski LB, Stout JE. Cavitary Pulmonary Disease. Clin Microbiol Rev 2008; 21:305-33. Jeong YJ, Kim KI, Seo IJ, Lee CH, Lee KN, Kim KN, Kim JS, Kwon WJ. Eosinophilic Lung Diseases: A Clinical, Radiologic, and Pathologic Overview RadioGraphics 2007; 27:617–39. Swartz J, Stoller JK. Acute Eosinophilic Pneumonia Complicating Coccidioides immitis Pneumonia: A Case Report and Literature Review. Respiration 2009; 77:102-6. Galgiani JN, Ampel NM, Blair JE, Catanzaro A, Johnson RH, Stevens DA, Williams PL. Coccidioidomycosis. Clin Infect Dis. 2005; 41(9):1217-23. Saubolle MA, McKellar PP, Sussland D. Epidemiologic, clinical, and diagnostic aspects of coccidioidomycosis. J Clin Microbiol. 2007; 45(1):26-30. Valdivia L, Nix D, Wright M, Lindberg E, Fagan T, Lieberman D, Stoffer T, Ampel NM, Galgiani JN. Coccidioidomycosis as a common cause of community-acquired pneumonia. Emerg Infect Dis. 2006; 12(6):958-62. Yozwiak ML, Lundergan LL, Kerrick SS, Galgiani JN. Symptoms and routine laboratory abnormalities associated with coccidioidomycosis. West J Med. 1988; 149(4):419-21. Binnicker MJ, Buckwalter SP, Eisberner JJ, Stewart RA, McCullough AE, Wohlfiel SL, Wengenack NL. Detection of Coccidioides species in clinical specimens by real-time PCR. J Clin Microbiol. 2007; 45(1):173-8.