HANS POPPER HEPATOPATHOLOGY SOCIETY

Microvesicular Steatosis: Current Issues in Pathology

Elizabeth M. Brunt
Saint Louis University School of Medicine
St. Louis, Missouri

Macrovesicular steatosis, defined as intracytoplasmic vacuoles that eccentrically displace the hepatocyte nucleus, is a common in finding in liver biopsies, as up to 5% of liver mass may be fat. Marked steatosis, a histologic feature of aberrant lipid metabolism, is indicative of liver involvement by a wide variety of systemic disorders, toxic or drug-induced liver injury, and of various specific liver diseases, including hepatitis C infection, Wilson's disease, and galactosemia.

"Fat people have fat livers" (Ludwig,1997); numerous historical and current studies have documented that obesity (primarily in the form of central/visceral fat) correlates with degree of hepatic steatosis and may be associated with progressive fibrosis in many forms of liver disease (viral hepatitis C, alcohol) and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease(s). There is currently a recognized epidemic of obesity and its related metabolic consequences. Concurrently, there is increasing awareness that nonalcoholic fatty liver disease is a significant form of progressive chronic liver disease in adults and in children. Some authorities have stated that nonalcoholic fatty liver disease may be the most common liver disease in North America. Rather than the relatively benign process this was once considered, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, the necroinflammatory progression of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, is known to potentially result in cirrhosis with its attendant complications including hepatocellular carcinoma, and liver-related morality. Recent studies have documented that many cases of otherwise cryptogenic cirrhosis may in fact be the result of "burned-out" fatty liver disease in which loss of histologically-identifiable hepatocellular steatosis has occurred.

Obesity- and nonobesity-related clinical associations that predispose to various forms of fatty liver disease, clinical features related to predisposition to progressive fibrosis, and the basic pathophysiologic mechanisms by which steatosis may progress to steatohepatitis with liver damage are areas of active investigation . In addition, as there remain no laboratory, serologic or imaging test(s) for confirmation (or exclusion) of the diagnosis of steatohepatitis, liver biopsy evaluation continues to serve a significant role in clinical diagnosis and determination of extent of ongoing liver cell injury, inflammation, and fibrosis. Therefore, the role of pathologists in both clinical care and investigative studies continues to be significant.

Current issues in pathology in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease relate to definition(s) of the constellation of findings necessary for and included in the diagnosis of steatohepatitis, the means by which activity and fibrosis are quantified, and specific diagnostic nomenclature. Various approaches to semi-quantitative evaluation have been proposed in order to focus on the histologic findings that distinguish steatohepatitis from other forms of chronic liver disease. Concordance studies have shown the difficulties for pathologists to agree on lesions of significance. Means of quantification and assignment of significance to amounts of steatosis and fibrosis vary markedly in studies focused on the importance of these findings; lack of agreement in these areas is a reflection of the challenges encountered currently.

Finally, terminology of the rubrics NAFLD and NASH is being questioned for several reasons. Pathologists cannot always distinguish the lesions of marked steatohepatitis as deriving from alcohol or the nonalcoholic syndromes and clinically-based studies are not concordant in definitions of "nonalcoholic" use. On the other hand, there are lesions seen in ALD that are not present in NAFLD, and vice versa. Perhaps it is time to formally consider a nomenclature that more reflects our growing understanding of the complex metabolic derangements that may result in steatohepatitis, removes the (non-)association with alcohol when appropriate, and parallels terminology of other forms of chronic liver disease in which the diagnosis of steatosis or steatohepatitis is followed by assignment of known clinical conditions. Unlinking the terminology of fatty liver disease from "alcohol" may also be useful in allowing natural history studies of the various entities that may result in the same histological features.

Selected References

  1. Burt AD, Mutton A, Day C. Diagnosis and interpretation of steatosis and steatohepatitis. Semin Diagn Pathol 15:246, 1998.
  2. Brunt EM. Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: Definition and Pathology. Semin Liver Dis 21:3, 2001.
  3. Caldwell SH, Oelsner DH, Iezzonie JC, et al. Cryptogenic cirrhosis: clinical characterization and risk factors for underlying disease. Hepatology 29: 664, 1999.
  4. Chitturi S, Farrell GC. Etiopathogenesis of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Semin Liver Dis 21:27, 2001.
  5. James OFW, Day CP. Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH): a disease of emerging identity and importance. J Hepatol 29:495, 1998.
  6. Diehl, AM. Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Semin Liver Dis 19:221, 1999.
  7. Falck-Ytter Y, Younoussi ZM, Marchesini G, and McCullough AJ. Clinical features and natural history of nonalcoholic steatosis syndromes. Semin Liver Dis 21:17, 2001.
  8. Ludwig J, McGill DB, Lindor KD. Metabolic liver diseases. Review: nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 12:398, 1997.
  9. McCullough AJ, Falck-Ytter Y. Body composition and hepatic steatosis as precursors for fibrosis in liver disease. Hepatology 29:1328, 1999.
  10. Rashid M, Roberts EA. Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis in children. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 30:48, 2000.