—  SHORT COURSE  —

OPHTHALMIC PATHOLOGY FOR THE NON-SPECIALIST


CASE 9 – BACTERIAL ENDOPHTHALMITIS

J. Godfrey Heathcote, M.B.,Ph.D.  —  Janice R. Safneck, M.D.




History
A 72-year-old woman with an indwelling bladder catheter developed a mixed bacterial urinary tract infection. She was receiving a course of intravenous antibiotics when vision in her left eye markedly decreased.

Diagnosis
Acute bacterial endophthalmitis (panophthalmitis)

Histopathology
Gross examination reveals a normal sized eye with hypopyon. On sectioning, yellow and white material suggestive of pus is prominent around anterior segment structures, as well as within vitreous cavity and in the region of the optic nerve head. Partial retinal detachment is identified.


Case 9, Slide 22 - Bacterial Endophthalmitis: Cut surface of globe showing yellow to white material particularly prominent around anterior segment structures, as well as within vitreous cavity and posteriorly in the region of the optic nerve head.

Case 9, Slide 23 - Bacterial Endophthalmitis: Pupil-optic nerve section showing a cellular infiltrate in the anterior chamber extending across the pupil, surrounding the lens, within vitreous (especially near the ciliary body and ora serrata) and near the optic nerve head.

Case 9, Slide 24 - Bacterial Endophthalmitis: Abundant acute inflammation in retina and vitreous as well as chronic non-granulomatous inflammation in the choroid.

On microscopy, acute inflammation is visible throughout the globe - within corneal epithelium and anterior and mid-stroma, in the anterior chamber, throughout the uveal tract but especially in the choroid, surrounding the cataractous lens, within vitreous, within and partially destroying retina, subretinally, and in sclera and episcleral tissues. Only the optic nerve beyond the lamina cribrosa is not affected. An occasional cluster of Gram-positive cocci is observed in vitreous. No granulomatous inflammation is seen but chronic non-granulomatous inflammation is apparent in choroid.

Discussion
Endophthalmitis is defined as inflammation of one or more coats of the eye and adjacent cavities. This means involvement of several intraocular structures or all of the intraocular contents. Panophthalmitis denotes inflammation of the entire globe including sclera. However, the term endophthalmitis often is used loosely to cover both limited inflammations and panophthalmitis. Endophthalmitis may be infectious or non-infectious. Infectious endophthalmitis is an uncommon but potentially sight-threatening condition which is either exogenous or endogenous, the former outnumbering the latter 3 to 1.1  In exogenous endophthalmitis microorganisms enter the globe from the external environment while in endogenous endophthalmitis, infection is spread hematogenously from elsewhere in the body.

Exogenous endophthalmitis can occur following surgery, trauma and severe keratitis. Postoperative endophthalmitis develops mainly after cataract surgery, the most common surgical procedure, with an incidence of 0.07 to 0.13%.2  The organisms primarily responsible are from the patient's own local microbiologic flora (Staphylococcus epidermidis and aureus and Streptococcus pneumoniae in acute endophthalmitis, and Staphylococcus epidermidis and Propionibacterium sp. in chronic endophthalmitis). Postraumatic endophthalmitis has an overall frequency of 7%. Prognosis is poorer than with other forms of endophthalmitis due to mixed flora infections and trauma associated damage and inflammation obscuring signs of infection. Staphylococcus epidermidis is the most common pathogen but Bacillus sp. infections are increasing and are noteworthy for the rapid destruction they can cause2  Only 1.8% of patients with ulcerative keratitis developed endophthalmitis with Pseudomonas and Streptococcus sp. predominating.3 

Endogenous (metastatic) endophthalmitis, the least common form of infectious endophthalmitis, typically occurs in the settings of immunosuppression, indwelling prostheses or catheters, bacteremia/fungemia, major surgery or intravenous drug abuse. However, patients occasionally have no risk factors or source of infection evident. Bilateral infections may occur. The onset may be rapid (bacterial) or insidious (fungal), making diagnosis and institution of vision-saving treatment difficult. Particularly in immunocompromised individuals, unusual fungi and bacteria may be the offending agents.

Most endogenous endophthalmitis is due to fungi, typically Candida sp. with Aspergillus sp. ranking second.4,5  Aspergillus generally produces extensive retinal necrosis and choroidal damage as a result of vascular and/or direct tissue invasion whereas Candida causes small foci of retinal damage from invasion of the organisms with multiple microabscesses surrounding organisms in the vitreous.6  Although only approximately 10% of patients with systemic fungal infections develop endophthalmitis, it has been shown at autopsy that those with ocular lesions generally have widespread fungal disease, even if not appreciated clinically.5  Bacterial endogenous endophthalmitis is less common; pathogens include Streptococcus sp., Staphylococcus aureus, Bacillus cereus, and enteric Gram-negative organisms.2  Escherichia coli endophthalmitis is very rare and almost exclusively occurs in diabetics, typically with urinary tract infections as the primary site.7 

Clinically, infectious endophthalmitis varies in presentation depending on the type of endophthalmitis and the organism(s) involved. Patients complain of increasing pain, decreasing visual acuity, ocular discharge, headache, red eye and photophobia; signs consist of lid swelling, corneal edema, fibrin and/or cells in the anterior chamber which can amount to hypopyon (pus in the anterior chamber), retrolenticular cells, increased intraocular pressure and hemorrhages within retina or iris.8  Diagnostic measures include sampling of aqueous humor, vitreous and/or tissue for culture, light microscopic examination with or without immunohistochemical or other special stains, electron microscopy, and molecular techniques such as PCR. The latter is emerging as an important method for identifying small numbers of organisms present in symptomatic but culture negative eyes.

On microscopy, inflammation may be acute suppurative chronic granulomatous, chronic non-granulomatous or mixed.

Suppurative endophthalmitis ranges from focal abscesses in choroid and retina to abundant inflammation throughout the eye with destruction of intraocular tissues. Prominent inflammation posteriorly particularly within choroid suggests endogenous endophthalmitis, in which organisms gain access through choroidal vessels. Exogenous infections tend to be centred more anteriorly with less choroidal inflammation.3  Bacteria may be seen with hematoxylin and eosin if numerous but usually Gram stain is required. One must ensure the organisms are genuine since debris and dispersed melanin granules sometimes can mimic organisms. Although suppurative inflammation alone typically indicates a bacterial pathogen, Candida sp. and Aspergillus sp. may be present without granulomatous inflammation,6  also, in immunocompromised patients, inflammation may be minimal and atypical with respect to the organism involved. Therefore, it is useful to routinely perform Methenamine silver and PAS stains. Absence of organisms does not eliminate the possibility of infectious endophthalmitis since bacteria particularly may be few and obscured by intense inflammation. In post-traumatic endophthalmitis, a foreign body may be observed. If only necrotic debris is evident, it is important to exclude completely necrotic tumor such as retinoblastoma which may mimic clinically and histologically suppurative endophthalmitis.

Granulomatous endophthalmitis may involve the eye focally or diffusely. Frequently, granulomas with or without necrosis are prominent within the uveal tract. Mycobacteria and fungi are important diagnostic considerations in this setting, the latter particularly if acute inflammation is also present. In exogenous endophthalmitis, fungi can penetrate intact tissues and fungal keratitis progressing to endophthalmitis does not require rupture of Descemet's membrane for the organisms to gain access to the interior of the eye, unlike the situation for bacteria. In mycobacterial infections granulomas need not show caseation. Differential diagnoses for granulomatous endophthalmitis include sarcoidosis, sympathetic ophthalmia, necrotizing scleritis, and phacoanaphylactic endophthalmitis. Sarcoidosis and sympathetic ophthalmia are characterized by non-necrotizing granulomas without acute inflammation. Necrotizing scleritis consists of necrotic tissue surrounded by palisading histiocytes and giant cells; it may involve intraocular contents but is centred around sclera.

Sometimes endophthalmitis may appear histologically with fibrosis and chronic non-granulomatous inflammation. This can occur if the organism is of low virulence, with retained foreign bodies, if the inflammation is neglected or in non-infectious endophthalmitis. If occasional granulomas or microabscesses are seen or eosinophils are prominent, particularly in a child, infection with Toxocara sp. should be considered.

Sequelae of endophthalmitis include corneal edema with band keratopathy (calcium deposits in the region of Bowman's layer) and stromal vascularization; blockage of anterior chamber either by inflammatory debris or by formation of peripheral anterior synechiae may result in glaucoma; cataract; posterior synechiae (adhesions between iris and lens) which also may cause glaucoma; vitreous fibrosis and vascularization; retinal detachment secondary to subretinal inflammation or epiretinal membrane formation; retinal and/or choroidal scarring; and cystoid macular edema. Ultimately, the eye may become shrunken with disorganization of intraocular contents (phthisis bulbi); osseous metaplasia may be seen, sufficient to require decalcification before processing for histology.

Ocular Infections In AIDS
Ocular complications of HIV infection can be seen in approximately 95% of patients.9  The spectrum includes infectious, neoplastic, vascular and iatrogenic processes affecting adnexal, anterior segment, posterior segment, neuroophthalmic and orbital structures.10  About 75% of AIDS patients will develop ocular infections attributable to viruses, parasites, fungi and bacteria, the organisms responsible varying with the population of affected individuals and country studied.9, 11  Multiple types of organisms may be present in the eye of a given patient, and viruses, parasites and fungi are more common pathogens than bacteria. Posterior segment infections are the most devastating, the most frequent being cytomegalovirus retinopathy, found in up to 40% of AIDS patients until recently, when, with the use of highly active antiretroviral therapy, the incidence dropped by at least half.9  Approximately 5% of patients have Toxoplasma gondii retinitis and/or ocular cryptococcosis, the former producing differing patterns of injury in individuals with AIDS versus immunocompetent patients. More than 80% of AIDS patients develop pneumocystis pneumonia but despite this, ocular involvement (pneumocystis choroiditis) is rare. Other intraocular pathogens include Herpes simplex and Varicella zoster viruses, BK virus, Histoplasma, Candida, Aspergillus, Treponema pallidum and mycobacteria. Ocular surface infections such as Microsporidium and Molluscum contagiosum also may be found .

Non-infectious Endophthalmitis
This includes a range of etiologies, including systemic autoimmune diseases, local ocular inflammations of unknown cause, endophthalmitis related to lens material (phacoanaphylactic endophthalmitis and phacotoxic endophthalmitis) and endophthalmitis attributable to intraocular foreign bodies.

Phacoanaphylactic endophthalmitis (lens-induced granulomatous inflammation) is a rare consequence of lens injury and represents an autoimmune response to lens protein to which the body is normally tolerant.12  Histopathologically a mixed neutrophilic and granulomatous response is centred about the lens, typically in a zonal pattern: neutrophils around degenerating lens material are surrounded by giant cells and histiocytes which in turn are surrounded by chronic non-granulomatous inflammation. Clinically, the condition is suspected in only 5% of histologically proven cases. Seventy percent of cases are associated with patchy choroidal chronic non-granulomatous inflammation, 60% with retinal detachment, 50% with retinal mononuclear cell perivasculitis, 30% with optic atrophy and 3-7% with sympathetic ophthalmia.12  The term "phakotoxic" endophthalmitis covers a mixed group of conditions related to intraocular lens implant surgery and possibly low-grade reactions to lens proteins.1,12 

References

  1. Wilson FM II: Causes and prevention of endophthalmitis. Int Ophthalmol Clin 1987;27:67-73.
  2. Kresloff MS, Castellarin AA, Zarbin MA: Endophthalmitis. Surv Ophthalmol 1998;43:193-224.
  3. Margo CE: Eyes removed for primary ulcerative keratitis with endophthalmitis: microbial and histologic findings. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers 1999;30:535-539.
  4. Klotz SA, et al: Fungal and parasitic infections of the eye. Clin Microbiol Rev 2000;13:662-685.
  5. McDonnell PJ, et al: Ocular involvement in patients with fungal infections. Ophthalmology 1985;92:706-709.
  6. Rao NA, Hidayat AA: Endogenous mycotic endophthalmitis: variations in clinical and histopathologic changes in candidiasis compared with aspergillosis. Am J Ophthalmol 2001;132:244-251.
  7. Park SB, et al: Endogenous endophthalmitis caused by Escherichia coli. Ann Ophthalmol 1993;25:95-99.
  8. Rowsey JJ, Jensen H, Sexton DJ: Clinical diagnosis of endophthalmitis. Int Ophthalmol Clin 1987;27:82-88.
  9. Kuo I, Rao NA: Ocular disease in AIDS. Springer Semin Immunopathol 1999;21:161-177.
  10. Ryan-Graham MA, Durand M, Pavan-Langston D: AIDS and the anterior segment. Int Ophthalmol Clin 1998;38:241-263.
  11. Pecorella I, et al: Postmortem histological sussrvey of the ocular lesions in a British population of AIDS patients. Br J Ophthalmol 2000;84:1275-1281.
  12. Marak GE Jr: Phacoanaphylactic endophthalmitis. Surv Ophthalmol 1992;36:325-339.