Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans
(DFS) is a relatively common lesion, which is more frequent in males with a peak age incidence of 25-45 years, and which occurs especially on the trunk and upper limbs. It begins as a dermal plaque or nodule and grows slowly, sometimes becoming multinodular. DFS recurs, especially if incompletely excised; metastasis occurs in fewer than 5% of cases and follows multiple recurrences; exceptionally, there is fibrosarcomatous or MFH-like transformation which is associated with a more aggressive course.

The lesion is composed of uniform elongated thin spindle cells with minimal cytoplasm and indistinct margins, in a striking and monotonous "tight" storiform pattern. The tumor forms a nodule or ill-defined plaque in the dermis which extends into subcutaneous fat with a characteristic honeycomb pattern including trabeculae or layers of infiltrating tumor parallel to the skin surface. Immunostaining shows strong diffuse CD34 expression, and focal reactivity for smooth muscle actin, but usually no significant staining for S100 protein. Some cases are CD117-positive, which has led to the suggested use of imatinib (Glivec) in locally advanced DFS or in metastatic disease [5, 6] .

The cell type of DFS is not clearly characterized ultrastructurally: histiocytic, perineural, pericytic and endothelial origin have all been suggested but most agree that there are variably developed features of fibroblasts (notably rough endoplasmic reticulum). The strong and diffuse CD34 expression supports the hypothesis that the tumor might be derived from (or differentiating towards) any of the local populations of normal CD34-positive fibroblasts - intradermal, periadnexal, or endoneurial. Occasionally, there are also focal peripheral filament bundles suggesting myofibroblastic differentiation. In keeping with this, some DFS are actin-positive, and focal areas of 'myoid' differentiation have been described in both DFS and, more frequently, in DFS-FS [7, 8, 9, 10, 11] . In these, the cells have short, blunt-ended nuclei with eosinophilic cytoplasm which is SMA positive but desmin and CD34 negative, and electron microscopy has shown (mostly) myofibroblastic differentiation. It has been suggested [12, 13] , however, that this represents a change in the stroma rather than the lesional cells. The feature has no clinical significance. Factor XIIIa (which stains dermal "dendrocytes") is generally not detectable in the principal lesional cells of DFS [14, 15] .

DFS has a reciprocal translocation, t(17;22)(q22;q13) (with a supernumerary ring chromosome) resulting in fusion of the genes COL1A (17q21-22) and PDGFB1(22q13) [16, 17, 18, 19] . The same abnormalities have also been shown in fibrosarcoma arising in DFS, in which COL1A1-PDGFB transcripts have been demonstrated [18, 20] . Other rearrangements, including t(2;17) and t(9;22) have rarely been found in DFS [21] . Gene expression profiling has shown high expression of a group of genes which included PDGFB and osteonectin [22] .

Myxoid and pigmented variants of DFS are described. Rarer atrophic, palisading and granular cell variants are also recognized but lack clinical significance. Myxoid DFS can be diagnosed by the characteristic cytology as well as the (variable) CD34 positivity. It must be distinguished from a range of benign myxoid lesions and from myxofibrosarcoma (by absence of nuclear pleomorphism and the different vascular pattern). Pigmented DFS (Bednar tumor) [23] has melanin-containing S100 protein-positive cells singly or in small clusters. This variant is incidentally more common in individuals with pigmented skin. It is cytogenetically identical to regular DFS [24] , and can also undergo fibrosarcomatous change [25] .

Fibrosarcoma can arise in DFS, both de novo and in recurrent lesions [9, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31] . It is characterized by greater cellularity, fascicular architecture and increased mitotic activity. CD34 can be positive or negative in the fibrosarcomatous area [32] . The fibrosarcomatous component behaves relatively aggressively, with local recurrence in over 50% and metastasis in 15% of cases [9] . However, adequate local control of DFS with fibrosarcomatous changes, with clear surgical margins, can reduce both local recurrence and the incidence of metastasis [33] .

Giant cell fibroblastomais a rare childhood (and occasionally adult) lesion of dermis/subcutis, predominantly arising in back of thigh, groin and chest wall (in a similar distribution to DFS) [28, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41] . GCF has recurrent potential. It is poorly circumscribed and infiltrative in skin and subcutis, with spindle and bland multinucleate cells in a fibrous and myxoid stroma, and focally forms cystic spaces lined by tumor (not endothelial) cells. Cellularity is variable, and both hypercellular and hypocellular (fibrous) areas occur. The lesional cells are CD34 positive and giant cell fibroblastoma has been recorded as recurring partially or completely as dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans, of either classical or pigmented types. This tumor is therefore currently considered to be a (juvenile) variant of DFS. The multinucleate cells are seen ultrastructurally to have a single nucleus with marked indentation and convolution. The cytogenetic abnormalities and molecular events in GCF are identical to those in DFS [42, 43] .

Solitary fibrous tumor
This neoplasm (SFT) was originally described in the pleura and has since been described in almost every site, including peritoneum, pericardium and mediastinum, liver, upper respiratory tract including nasal cavity, salivary gland and breast [44] . SFT is increasingly recognized in soft tissues [45, 46, 47, 48] . The lesion is circumscribed but rarely encapsulated, and is composed of plump or slender spindle or rounded cells in a collagenous background. The cells are bland and have scanty cytoplasm; multinucleated cells are sometimes present. Lesional cells are arranged in a "patternless" pattern, sometimes with alternating hyper- and hypocellular regions. In the latter, there is variable collagenization, which is focally dense although stroma is sometimes myxoid. The vessels are focally hemangiopericytomatous, and islands of mature fat can occur (lipomatous hemangiopericytoma [49, 50, 51, 52] ). Mitotic activity varies from 0-50 per 10 HPF, and some cases have necrosis or hemorrhage. Immunohistochemically, strong and diffuse CD34 and bcl-2 expression are a feature of this tumor type [2, 53, 54] . Indeed, a CD34-negative tumor in an extra-pleural location should probably not be diagnosed as solitary fibrous tumor unless the other evidence is compelling [44] . CD99 is also positive [55] and sporadically there is focal positivity for actin, S100 protein and (exceptionally) cytokeratin. Electron microscopy shows fibroblastic cells with very occasional myofibroblasts. In spite of the original reports of pleural tumors, SFT does not show evidence of mesothelial differentiation. A variety of genetic findings has been reported including loss of 13q, 4q and 21q; trisomy 21; and gains at chromosome 8 and at 15q; t(4;15)(q13;q26) [56] , t(6;17)(p11.2;q23) [57] , and t(9;22)(q31;p13) [58] , and also, once again, rearrangements involving 12q13-15 [57] .

Predominantly myxoid SFT (myxoid change exceeding 50% of the tumor) is very uncommon, perhaps representing <5% of SFT [59] . Cords of bland spindle cells lie in a vascular myxoid stroma, with focal cellular aggregates, and most also have areas of typical solitary fibrous tumor with variable collagenization and staghorn vessels. Nuclear atypia is absent. All cases are positive for CD34 and CD99. None of the reported cases experienced recurrence or metastasis.

SFT displays a spectrum of behavior. Recurrence is more likely with larger and histologically aggressive tumors, and atypical and malignant variants in soft tissue have been identified [47, 60] . Suggested criteria for malignant SFT [44] are (1) presence in an otherwise typical SFT of at least two of: high cellularity with nuclear crowding and overlapping, pleomorphism, and mitoses >4/10 hpf (and one could perhaps add necrosis); and (2) development of sarcoma in the site of a previous SFT. CD34 expression can be lost in the malignant component.

Hemangiopericytoma
Stout and Murray originally described hemangiopericytoma (HPC) in 1942 [61] with a further report of 25 cases in 1949 [62]. Examination of these series suggests a heterogeneous group of neoplasms, including probable myofibroma. Stout himself stressed that the exact nature of the cells in these tumors had not been proved, and that there was no scientific basis in support of the designation. HPC is in fact becoming a diagnosis of exclusion as a wide variety of benign and malignant lesions show at least focally the non-specific but characteristic branching and staghorn open vascular pattern [63]. Many cases that would previously have been termed hemangiopericytoma are now, on the basis of diffuse CD34 expression, diagnosed as solitary fibrous tumors (SFT).

Some Tumors with Hemangiopericytomatous Pattern

Cellular hemangioma Myofibroma Intranodal myofibroblastoma Perivascular myoma Glomus tumor Benign fibrous histiocytoma (deep) Solitary fibrous tumor Giant cell angiofibroma Hemangiopericytoma

Congenital infantile fibrosarcoma Nerve sheath tumors Leiomyosarcoma Liposarcoma (round cell) Mesenchymal chondrosarcoma Malignant fibrous histiocytoma Synovial sarcoma Malignant hemangiopericytoma

Pericytes are spindle cells surrounding small arterioles, capillaries and pre- and post-capillary venules, usually in a single complete or incomplete layer. Ultrastructurally, pericytes have overlapping processes and a continuous or interrupted external lamina lies between them and the endothelium. Variable features include micropinocytosis, microfilaments with dense bodies and junctions. Their immunophenotype varies with location: those around precapillary and postcapillary vessels express smooth muscle actin (SMA), whereas pericytes around capillaries are SMA negative [64]. The latter perivascular cell has been considered to represent a persistent primitive mesenchymal cell that can, according to circumstance and specific location, differentiate into (vascular) smooth muscle cells, glomus cells, preadipocytes and osteoblasts [65]. This cell type has also been postulated as the precursor cell of MFH [66]. The group of tumors termed PEComas is supposedly derived from a SMA/HMB45 positive perivascular epithelioid cell but the normal counterpart of this cell has not been demonstrated [67].

The pericyte lacks specific morphologic features, and it is not clear that hemangiopericytoma, which is usually SMA negative, is composed of pericytes [68, 69] . Nevertheless, cases still remain which are diagnosed as HPC after extensive investigation. A current definition might be: a tumor which has (a) spindled, plump, or rounded cells with small to moderate amounts of cytoplasm and indistinct cell margins; (b) a consistent HPC-vascular pattern throughout the entire tumor, with reticulin surrounding individual cells, and (c) the absence of specific differentiation, both morphologically and immunohistochemically. Such tumors usually occur in the deep soft tissue of extremities and retroperitoneum (here associated with hypoglycaemia and hypophosphatemia) but cases are reported in the breast, orbit, nasal cavity, and CNS as well.

CD34 positivity has been reported in apparent HPC, but the majority of cases formerly called HPC are now regarded as solitary fibrous tumors, especially when the CD34 expression is strong and diffuse. However, in SFT the HPC pattern is usually only focal. There is an occasional report of desmin or smooth muscle actin positivity, and FXIIIa and HLA-DR expression have been reported in a constant subpopulation of HPC cells, as well as a few cells with FVIIIRAg [70]. This is not, however, specific, as FXIIIa is present in many spindle cell tumors. Recently, scanty focal CD117 has been described in a small number of HPC [71].

Neoplastic cells in HPC are described ultrastructurally as having overlapping processes with poorly developed junctions, focal myoid differentiation, and a fragmented external lamina between tumor cells and between them and the endothelium [68, 69] . In SFT, the cells are fibroblast-like without external lamina, with rare myofibroblasts [46, 60] . Occasionally myofilaments are seen in pericytes , and recently a group of tumors has been described with perivascular myoid differentiation [72]. This group included tumors with histologic features of infantile-type myofibromatosis, tumors with composite features of "hemangiopericytoma" and glomus tumor, and tumors with a distinctive concentric perivascular proliferation of spindle cells. Morphologic overlap among the groups suggests they are part of a single spectrum, termed perivascular myomas or myopericytomas, and some of these resemble and perhaps overlap with vascular leiomyoma. Strictly speaking, since they show specific differentiation these should be excluded from the HPC category.

Cytogenetic studies can exclude or identify specific tumor types with a hemangiopericytomatous pattern, such as synovial sarcoma with its t(X;18)(p11.2;q11.2) [73] and round cell liposarcoma which predominantly shows t(12;16)(q13;p11). Changes described in HPC have included t(1;3)(q22;q11) and t(7;12)(p22;q13) [74] ; t(12;19)(q13;q13.3) [75] and t(13;22)(q22;q11) [76] . Thus, 12q13 is implicated [77] but this segment is rearranged in several soft tissue sarcomas and the findings are not specific [78] .

The behavior of HPC cannot always be predicted from the histology. A benign HPC lacks cellular pleomorphism, necrosis and hemorrhage and has a low mitotic rate (either < 4/10 hpf [79] or < 1/20 hpf [80] ). With this definition, around 70% of HPC behave in a benign fashion, but some histologically benign cases have metastasized. The existence of a borderline grade (<4mitoses/10hpf, <5% necrosis) has been suggested [81] but the numbers are too small to assess the validity of this study. Clear-cut malignant cases, with necrosis and mitotic rates higher than above, have five- and ten-year survival rates of around 40% and 29% respectively.

In conclusion, most soft tissue tumors with a hemangiopericytomatous pattern can be given a more specific diagnosis. Many are now classified as solitary fibrous tumors, especially if they show varying cellularity and fibrosis and diffuse immunoreactivity for CD34 and bcl2 and often CD99. Some remain which can be termed hemangiopericytoma although there is no conclusive evidence that the tumor cells are derived from pericytes.

Lipomatous hemangiopericytoma.
Soft tissue tumors in adults have been described with HPC pattern and a component of mature fat [49, 50, 51, 52] , mostly in males in deep soft tissue, mediastinum or retroperitoneum. They are circumscribed and display an intricate mix of HPC areas and adipose tissue. Perivascular or stromal hyalinization and focal myxoid change can be seen. Atypia is rare and the reported lesions have been benign. Cases are generally CD99 positive but expression of CD34 and bcl2 has been variable. Folpe et al found CD34 in 2 of 4 cases [51] , and in the series of Guillou et al, 7 of 12 were bcl2 positive and 10 of 13 were CD34 positive (one case expressed neither) [52] , so that at least some of these might represent variants of SFT [52] . Sinonasal hemangiopericytoma is a CD34-negative lesion with smooth muscle-like features that might represent differentiation towards a glomus or perivascular myoid cell [82, 83, 84] and appears to be unrelated to HPC or SFT elsewhere.

Myxoinflammatory fibroblastic sarcoma
This is a recently documented low-grade fibrosarcoma, which occurs mainly in digits, wrist and ankle regions, and predominantly in the subcutis. Montgomery et al [85] described 51 such cases as in flammatory myxohyaline tumor of distal extremities with virocyte or Reed-Sternberg-like cells. They occurred over a wide age range (4 – 81 years) and affected the sexes equally. 35 were in fingers, hand, wrist or arm, and 13 in toe, foot or lower leg. Many of the patients were treated aggressively but recurrences were noted in six of twenty-seven patients with follow-up. Almost simultaneously, a series of 44 apparently similar tumors in patients aged between 20 and 91 years was reported [3] as "acral myxoinflammatory fibroblastic sarcoma". These authors also noted a relation to tendon sheaths and joints in some cases. There was local recurrence in two thirds (67%) and several patients required amputation after repeated local recurrences, and histologically documented metastasis to lymph node in one individual. 5 tumors of the hand reported as "inflammatory myxoid tumor of the soft parts with bizarre giant cells" [86] , appear to be the same entity. It is now known that this tumor can occur more proximally [87] and the term acral has been dropped in the 2002 WHO classification [88] .

Myxoinflammatory fibroblastic sarcomas form infiltrative multinodular masses characterized by dense inflammation merging with myxoid to collagenous stroma. The myxoid zones contain (multi)vacuolated lipoblast-like fibroblasts, as seen in other myxoid fibroblastic lesions and representing stromal mucin within dilated RER. The inflammatory zones have scattered bizarre cells with vesicular nuclei and large inclusion-like nucleoli with abundant focally vacuolated cytoplasm, reminiscent of Reed-Sternberg cells or "virocytes", some of which contain phagocytosed neutrophils. Ultrastructurally, these cells contain markedly dilated cisternae of rough endoplasmic reticulum, and perinuclear whorls of intermediate filaments. Other components include eosinophils, neutrophils, lymphocytes, plasma cells, Touton giant cells and siderophages, and fibrosis (including sclerosed and hyalinized areas). Normal and atypical mitoses are seen among the bizarre cells, and some cases display focal necrosis.

Immunostains are positive for vimentin and negative for CD30, CD15, and S100 protein; 4 of 13 cases were cytokeratin positive [85] . In the Swedish series, 7 of 25 were CD34 positive, 2 were SMA positive in occasional bizarre cells, and Ki67 labeling index was less than one per cent [3] . Ultrastructural studies in this series demonstrated fibroblastic characteristics, and the ganglion-like cells are interpreted as modified fibroblasts. Clonal chromosome changes have been described in one case, which showed a complex karyotype with a reciprocal translocation t(1;10) (p22;q24) in addition to the loss of chromosomes 3 and 13 [89] .

LOW GRADE SARCOMAS OF MYOFIBROBLASTS

Introduction
Myofibroblasts are modified fibroblasts [90, 91] which were first described in granulation tissue [92] and have since been identified in normal tissues and as the predominant cell in certain reactive lesions. In granulation tissue, in which they have been most intensively investigated, they are probably derived from local fibroblasts [92, 28, 52] , in response to mechanical stress, and their functions, appearance and immunoprofile vary in relation to the phase of activity [93] . This is reflected in the variable morphology of reactive lesions such as nodular fasciitis, and contributes to the range of appearances seen in other pathological conditions. Myofibroblast-like cells might sometimes be derived from vascular smooth muscle cells or from pericytes [91] , or by metaplasia as in spindled carcinomas [94] . Some fibroblastic lesions have a component of myofibroblasts, but myofibroblasts do not apparently differentiate to smooth muscle cells. In wound healing, as epithelialization is completed, the myofibroblasts are presumed to disappear by apoptosis [95, 96, 97] .

Myofibroblasts are short, bi- or tripolar spindle-shaped or stellate cells, with crenated or ovoid pale-staining nuclei each of which has a single distinct, punctate nucleolus. There is sparse cytoplasm with indistinct cell margins. In addition to synthesizing collagens and other stromal components including fibronectin and laminin, myofibroblasts have contractile elements } . Other ultrastructural features of myofibroblasts [93,] include a prominent Golgi complex and collagen secretion granules in Golgi-derived vesicles. Fibroblasts have variable amounts of rough endoplasmic reticulum which can become distended with secretory products, but they lack external lamina, pinocytosis and organized cytoplasmic filaments. Fibroblasts express only vimentin, whereas myofibroblasts display various combinations of vimentin, actin isoforms (especially a-smooth muscle actin), desmin, and myosin [101, 102] . Desmin is found less often in myofibroblastic neoplasms than in smooth muscle tumors [103] , but both types of neoplasms can have detectable desmin, muscle specific actin (MSA) and smooth muscle actin (SMA). Myofibroblasts express calponin but usually lack h-caldesmon, a marker of smooth muscle differentiation [104] . Some myofibroblastic lesions can show cytoplasmic (but not usually membranous) immunoreactivity for CD117 (c-kit); this varies with technical factors, including the antibody and whether there is antigen retrieval [105] . In intra-abdominal lesions, this can lead to confusion with gastrointestinal stromal tumor [71] .

Benign neoplasms of myofibroblasts occur in soft tissues, bone and visceral locations. The term myofibrosarcoma, by analogy with the term fibrosarcoma, indicates a malignant tumor of myofibroblasts [106] . Myofibrosarcomas display a range of appearances from fasciitis-like neoplasms to high grade sarcomas. Low- and intermediate-grade myofibrosarcomas are distinct from pleomorphic myofibrosarcomas, which are malignant fibrous histiocytoma-like tumors. Other low-grade malignant tumors with myofibroblasts include inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor and infantile fibrosarcoma, each of which has characteristic genetic abnormalities.

The myofibrosarcoma concept has been controversial. Many fibroblastic lesions have myofibroblasts, and the proportion of neoplastic myofibroblasts required is not defined. It is difficult to confirm myofibroblastic differentiation without electron microscopy, and there is no universal agreement on the ultrastructural criteria of the neoplastic myofibroblast } . Since [107,] subcellular features can be incompletely or abnormally developed in malignant cells, the fibronexus has not been an absolute requirement for most investigators. This structure has, however, been reported in several myofibrosarcomas [109] , and has been illustrated more often in case reports than it has been mentioned by their authors [103, 110] . Identification of a cell type depends on several features, and the fibronexus is only one of the features used to define myofibroblastic differentiation.

It has also been held that sarcomas supposedly composed of myofibroblasts are actually poorly developed smooth muscle tumors [111] . Low-grade leiomyosarcomas, however, usually have well-developed smooth muscle differentiation. Furthermore, although the cytoplasmic filament patterns can be somewhat similar in myofibroblasts and smooth muscle cells, the two cell types differ in other respects - unlike myofibroblasts, smooth muscle cells have external lamina, and cell membrane plaques as well as pinocytotic vesicles. Leiomyosarcoma and myofibrosarcoma can both display actins and desmin, but the latter is less often seen in myofibroblastic neoplasms. Also, in myofibrosarcomas, the actin staining is often manifested as a peripheral rim rather than throughout the cytoplasm [112] . The paucity of h-caldesmon in myofibroblastic lesions additionally supports their separate identity [104, 113] .

Thus, the ultrastructural features and immunohistochemistry, in conjunction with the morphology, are sufficiently distinctive to identify myofibroblastic differentiation in sarcomas. The two principal low grade lesions in this category are myofibrosarcoma and inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor.

Low-grade myofibrosarcoma is a distinctive neoplasm which occurs in soft tissues and bone as a fasciitis- or fibrosarcoma-like spindle cell sarcoma which infiltrates locally but rarely metastasizes. Myofibroblasts were observed in well-differentiated fibrosarcoma in 1975 [114] , and the first 'sarcoma of myofibroblasts' was reported 3 years later [115] . About 50 cases have since appeared in the literature [109, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127] .

Low- and intermediate-grade myofibrosarcomas occur at any age (range 7-85 years, mean 40) with a slight male predominance and tumor size ranging between 1.5 and 17 cm. Tumors can arise in extremities, trunk including breast, and retroperitoneum, but there is a predilection (up to one-third of cases) for the head and neck region in both soft tissue (including oral cavity especially tongue, face and neck), and bone, notably maxilla and mandible

Myofibrosarcomas can be found in subcutis or submucosa, but are mostly deep soft tissue or intraosseous tumors. They can be circumscribed, but mostly infiltrate irregularly along connective tissue septa or into skeletal muscle. The tumors are composed of mostly bland or focally pleomorphic stellate or spindled cells with tapered or ovoid nuclei with small nucleoli, and scanty or moderate amounts of eosinophilic cytoplasm. The patterns include fibrosarcoma-like fascicles, sheets or storiform whorls, with variable collagenous or myxoid stroma and scanty inflammation. Nuclear atypia is always present at least focally and usually mildly with scattered enlarged hyperchromatic nuclei, but larger atypical cells are sometimes seen. Mitotic activity is observed but necrosis is unusual Recurrences tend to be more pleomorphic [124, 128] , but in one example a breast metastasis from a grade 2 fibrosarcoma-like tumor resembled nodular fasciitis [124] .

Electron microscopy shows myofibroblasts which have variable RER, cytoplasmic filament bundles, and in some cases minimal external lamina. Fibronexus structures and collagen secretion granules are rarely found. Low-grade myofibrosarcomas express actin (as a peripheral rim, beneath the cell membrane), and about one-half express desmin, usually in fewer cells [123, 124] . These antigens can be expressed separately, with either a desmin positive/SMA negative or desmin negative/SMA positive immunophenotype [123] . Calponin is diffusely positive, but h-caldesmon is only focally expressed in an occasional case [129] . These findings are similar to those in nodular fasciitis, and differ somewhat from leiomyosarcoma, which usually displays diffuse h-caldesmon as well as calponin. Fibronectin [130] has been found in some myofibrosarcomas but not collagen IV or laminin. Rare myofibrosarcomas focally display cytokeratins or CD34 [123] , and one example had focal S100 protein positivity [118] . ALK-1 expression has not been reported.

Immunohistochemistry of smooth muscle and fibro/myofibroblastic tumors

	Des	SMA	MSA	S100	EMA	CK	CD34	Calp	hCald
Leiomyosarcoma	+	+	+	+	+	+	±	+	+
Myofibrosarcoma	±	+	±	-*	-	-*	-	+	-*
Fibrosarcoma*	-	-*	-	-	-	-	±	-	-
	+ = diagnostically useful + = also sometimes found ± = inconsistently reported - = absent * = very occasionally positive					des = desmin SMA = smooth muscle actin MSA = muscle specific actin EMA = epithelial membrane antigen CK = cytokeratin calp = calponin hcald = heavy caldesmon

Low-grade myofibrosarcomas are indolent, but they can relapse and metastasize even after a long period. In one series, there was local recurrence in two of 11 patients and metastasis in one [123] . In the series of Montgomery et al [124] , 4 of 9 low-grade myofibrosarcomas, and three of four intermediate grade tumors recurred (one twice), and one intermediate-grade tumor which arose in the breast resulted in pulmonary metastasis after 12 months.

Myofibrosarcomas can resemble benign myofibroblastic lesions such as nodular fasciitis and fibromatosis, and other sarcomas, notably fibrosarcoma and leiomyosarcoma. Both clinical data and morphology are important for diagnosis since immunohistochemistry does not discriminate between myofibroblastic lesions and the immunophenotype overlaps with that of smooth muscle.

Nodular fasciitis is a mainly subcutaneous lesion which appears suddenly and grows rapidly but does not usually exceed 5 cm in diameter. There are myxoid, cellular and fibrous areas, often in different parts of the same lesion. Nuclear atypia and necrosis are absent. Myofibrosarcoma is more cellular and uniform than nodular fasciitis, and infiltrates more widely. Fibromatosis has files of slender spindle cells in dense collagen with slit-like blood vessels and mast cells, and lacks nuclear atypia. Fibromatosis also infiltrates skeletal muscle, but muscle fibres show atrophy rather than separation by tumor as in myofibrosarcoma.

Adult-type fibrosarcoma has a more herringbone-like fascicular architecture, and cells with scanty cytoplasm and elongated tapered nuclei. There is variable intercellular collagen and myoid markers are usually absent. Leiomyosarcoma typically has alternating fascicles of cells that are more parallel-sided with square-ended nuclei scattered paranuclear vacuoles. Caldesmon expression is more widespread. Other spindle cell sarcomas such as synovial sarcoma, malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor, some examples of angiosarcoma and spindle cell rhabdomyosarcoma can be recognized by their morphology and by their specific immunophenotype. In head and neck and breast tumors, spindle cell carcinoma has to be excluded by use of multiple cytokeratin antibodies.

Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor (IMT) is most commonly seen in the lung in childhood. Extrapulmonary tumors usually arise within the abdomen, (retroperitoneum or mesentery) as a solitary or multicentric mass [131, 132] with peak incidence in the first or second decades with a slight female predominance. There are sometimes B-type systemic symptoms, anemia and hypergammaglobulinemia. Similar cases have also been termed inflammatory fibrosarcoma [133] , but these conditions probably represent a single entity with a spectrum of morphology and behavior [134] , i.e. a low-grade neoplasm of myofibroblasts.

IMT presents with multinodular and sometimes multiple firm white or yellow tumors up to 10 cm in diameter. Histologically (Fig 18) these are irregularly infiltrative lesions with three principal patterns, usually found in combination (1) fasciitis-like, with bland stellate or short spindle cells in a vascular, myxoid and inflamed stroma, including numerous plasma cells (2) fascicular and fibrosarcoma- or leiomyosarcoma-like, again with marked inflammation (3) hypocellular areas with hyalinization and calcification. The lesional cells are usually uniform, but atypical cells with prominent nucleoli [133] , and ganglion-like or Reed-Sternberg-like cells can occasionally be seen [135] .

Ultrastructurally, the cells are fibroblastic and myofibroblastic [132, 133, 136] . Most cases are positive for SMA and MSA, and a smaller number for desmin some (especially those in a submesothelial location) express cytokeratins. ALK immunostaining is positive in 36% to 60% [137, 138, 139] of cases, with a granular pattern in cytoplasm or nucleus, and sometimes cell and nuclear membranous accentuation the variant patterns possibly relating to different fusion genes. ALK expression, found predominantly in abdominal and pulmonary IMT in childhood, might be associated with an improved outcome.

Genetically, many IMT have clonal chromosomal abnormalities involving 2p22-24, and fusion of the anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene, located on 2p23, which encodes a tyrosine kinase receptor, with tropomyosin 3 (TPM3-ALK) or tropomyosin 4 (TPM4-ALK) is found in a subset [140] . A transcript involving ALK and CLTC (clathrin heavy chain gene, localized to 17q23) has additionally been reported [141] .

A third of cases, especially among intra-abdominal tumors, recur at least once. IMT can have increasing atypia with recurrence, and metastasizing sarcomatous change, with metastasis has been reported [142] . However, no factors have been identified which reliably predict behavior in these tumors. It has been suggested that the presence of atypia, ganglion-like cells, p53 expression and aneuploidy might be useful to identify IMT that might undergo pursue a more aggressive clinical course [143, 144] . Surgical resection is the usual treatment for both primary and recurrent tumors.

The differential diagnosis relates to the various histological patterns. Retroperitoneal fibrosis has a distinctive clinical picture, is more inflammatory with mixed cells, and lacks pleomorphism. Fibromatosis has a distinctive architecture (intra-abdominal fibromatosis can have prominent keloidal collagen bundles) and is infiltrated by mast cells rather than plasma cells. Low grade myxofibrosarcoma has a more monomorphous pattern and lacks the prominent inflammatory component. Inflammatory MFH has atypical xanthomatous cells, while inflammatory leiomyosarcoma is more myoid, although the distinction can sometimes be difficult. Solitary fibrous tumor demonstrates CD34 expression, and sarcomatoid mesothelioma displays epithelial markers. Follicular dendritic cell sarcoma can masquerade as inflammatory pseudotumor in liver or spleen (see above) but is readily identified by expression of CD21, CD23, and CD35. When there is intestinal wall involvement or a prominent fascicular architecture, the possibility of GI stromal tumor may be raised. This has shorter, plumper cells and less inflammation, and immunostaining with CD117 is positive with a membranous accentuation, in a different pattern from the weaker staining seen in myofibroblastic lesions.

References

1. van de Rijn M, Rouse RV. CD34. A review. Appl Immunohistochem 19942:71-80.
2. van de Rijn M, Lombard CM, Rouse RV. Expression of CD34 by solitary fibrous tumors of the pleura, mediastinum, and lung. Am J Surg Pathol 199418:814-820.
3. Meis-Kindblom JM, Kindblom LG. Acral myxoinflammatory fibroblastic sarcoma: a low-grade tumor of the hands and feet. Am J Surg Pathol 199822:911-924.
4. Smith ME, Fisher C, Weiss SW. Pleomorphic hyalinizing angiectatic tumor of soft parts. A low-grade neoplasm resembling neurilemoma. Am J Surg Pathol 199620:21-29.
5. Rubin BP, Schuetze SM, Eary JF, et al. Molecular targeting of platelet-derived growth factor B by imatinib mesylate in a patient with metastatic dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans. J Clin Oncol 200220:3586-3591.
6. Maki RG, Awan RA, Dixon RH, et al. Differential sensitivity to imatinib of 2 patients with metastatic sarcoma arising from dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans. Int J Cancer 2002100:623-626.
7. Calonje E, Fletcher CD. Myoid differentiation in dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans and its fibrosarcomatous variant: clinicopathologic analysis of 5 cases. J Cutan Pathol 199623:30-36.
8. Diaz-Cascajo C. Myoid differentiation in dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans and its fibrosarcomatous variant. J Cutan Pathol 199724:197-198.
9. Mentzel T, Beham A, Katenkamp D, et al. Fibrosarcomatous ("high-grade") dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans: clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical study of a series of 41 cases with emphasis on prognostic significance. Am J Surg Pathol 199822:576-587.
10. Morimitsu Y, Hisaoka M, Okamoto S, et al. Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans and its fibrosarcomatous variant with areas of myoid differentiation: a report of three cases. Histopathology 199832:547-551.
11. O'Connell JX, Trotter MJ. Fibrosarcomatous dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans with myofibroblastic differentiaion: a histologically distinctive variant [corrected]. Mod Pathol 19969:273-278.
12. Sanz-Trelles A, Ayala-Carbonero A, Rodrigo-Fernandez I, Weil-Lara B. Leiomyomatous nodules and bundles of vascular origin in the fibrosarcomatous variant of dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans. J Cutan Pathol 199825:44-49.
13. Wang J, Zhu X, Yosuke M, et al. [Myoid/myofibroblastic differentiation in dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans: a clinicopathologic study of six cases]. Zhonghua Bing Li Xue Za Zhi 200130:12-15.
14. Hsi ED, Nickoloff BJ. Dermatofibroma and dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans: an immunohistochemical study reveals distinctive antigenic profiles. J Dermatol Sci 199611:1-9.
15. Oliveira-Soares R, Viana I, Vale E, et al. Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans: a clinicopathological study of 20 cases. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 200216:441-446.
16. Pedeutour F, Simon MP, Minoletti F, et al. Translocation, t(1722)(q22q13), in dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans: a new tumor-associated chromosome rearrangement. Cytogenet Cell Genet 199672:171-174.
17. Simon MP, Pedeutour F, Sirvent N, et al. Deregulation of the platelet-derived growth factor B-chain gene via fusion with collagen gene COL1A1 in dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans and giant-cell fibroblastoma. Nat Genet 199715:95-98.
18. Wang J, Hisaoka M, Shimajiri S, et al. Detection of COL1A1-PDGFB fusion transcripts in dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction using archival formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues. Diagn Mol Pathol 19998:113-119.
19. Sirvent N, Maire G, Pedeutour F. Genetics of dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans family of tumors: from ring chromosomes to tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 200337:1-19.
20. Sheng WQ, Hashimoto H, Okamoto S, et al. Expression of COL1A1-PDGFB fusion transcripts in superficial adult fibrosarcoma suggests a close relationship to dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans. J Pathol 2001194:88-94.
21. Sonobe H, Furihata M, Iwata J, et al. Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans harboring t(922)(q32q12.2). Cancer Genet Cytogenet 1999110:14-18.
22. Sandberg AA, Bridge JA. Updates on the cytogenetics and molecular genetics of bone and soft tissue tumors. Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans and giant cell fibroblastoma. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 2003140:1-12.
23. Dupree WB, Langloss JM, Weiss SW. Pigmented dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (Bednar tumor). A pathologic, ultrastructural, and immunohistochemical study. Am J Surg Pathol 19859:630-639.
24. Nishio J, Iwasaki H, Ishiguro M, et al. Supernumerary ring chromosome in a Bednar tumor (pigmented dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans) is composed of interspersed sequences from chromosomes 17 and 22: a fluorescence in situ hybridization and comparative genomic hybridization analysis. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 200130:305-309.
25. Bisceglia M, Vairo M, Calonje E, Fletcher CD. [Pigmented fibrosarcomatous dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (Bednar tumor). 3 case reports, analogy with the "conventional" type and review of the literature]. Pathologica 199789:264-273.
26. Zamecnik M, Michal M. Myxoid variant of dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans with fibrosarcomatous areas. Zentralbl Pathol 1993139:373-376.
27. Wrotnowski U, Cooper PH, Shmookler BM. Fibrosarcomatous change in dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans. Am J Surg Pathol 198812:287-293.
28. Connelly JH, Evans HL. Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans. A clinicopathologic review with emphasis on fibrosarcomatous areas. Am J Surg Pathol 199216:921-925.
29. Diaz-Cascajo C, Weyers W, Borrego L, et al. Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans with fibrosarcomatous areas: a clinico-pathologic and immunohistochemic study in four cases. Am J Dermatopathol 199719:562-567.
30. Ding J, Hashimoto H, Enjoji M. Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans with fibrosarcomatous areas. A clinicopathologic study of nine cases and a comparison with allied tumors. Cancer 198964:721-729.
31. Lopes JM, Paiva ME. Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans. A histological and ultrastructural study of 11 cases with emphasis on the study of recurrences and histogenesis. Pathol Res Pract 1991187:806-813.
32. Goldblum JR. CD34 positivity in fibrosarcomas which arise in dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1995119:238-241.
33. Goldblum JR, Reith JD, Weiss SW. Sarcomas arising in dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans: a reappraisal of biologic behavior in eighteen cases treated by wide local excision with extended clinical follow up. Am J Surg Pathol 200024:1125-1130.
34. Terrier-Lacombe MJ, Guillou L, Maire G, et al. Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans, giant cell fibroblastoma, and hybrid lesions in children: clinicopathologic comparative analysis of 28 cases with molecular data--a study from the French Federation of Cancer Centers Sarcoma Group. Am J Surg Pathol 200327:27-39.
35. Karabela-Bouropoulou V, Liapi-Avgeri G, Mahera H, et al. Giant cell fibroblastoma: an entity or a reactive phenomenon? Pathol Res Pract 1999195:413-419.
36. Perry DA, Schultz LR, Dehner LP. Giant cell fibroblastoma with dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans-like transformation. J Cutan Pathol 199320:451-454.
37. Shmookler BM, Enzinger FM, Weiss SW. Giant cell fibroblastoma. A juvenile form of dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans. Cancer 198964:2154-2161.
38. Beham A, Fletcher CD. Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans with areas resembling giant cell fibroblastoma: report of two cases. Histopathology 199017:165-167.
39. Alguacil-Garcia A. Giant cell fibroblastoma recurring as dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans. Am J Surg Pathol 199115:798-801.
40. Diaz-Cascajo C, Borrego L, Bastida-Inarrea J, Borghi S. Giant cell fibroblastoma. New histological observations. Am J Dermatopathol 199618:403-408.
41. Goldblum JR. Giant cell fibroblastoma: a report of three cases with histologic and immunohistochemical evidence of a relationship to dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1996120:1052-1055.
42. Maire G, Martin L, Michalak-Provost S, et al. Fusion of COL1A1 exon 29 with PDGFB exon 2 in a der(22)t(1722) in a pediatric giant cell fibroblastoma with a pigmented Bednar tumor component. Evidence for age-related chromosomal pattern in dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans and related tumors. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 2002134:156-161.
43. Vanni R, Faa G, Dettori T, et al. A case of dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans of the vulva with a COL1A1/PDGFB fusion identical to a case of giant cell fibroblastoma. Virchows Arch 2000437:95-100.
44. Chan JK. Solitary fibrous tumour--everywhere, and a diagnosis in vogue. Histopathology 199731:568-576.
45. Suster S, Nascimento AG, Miettinen M, et al. Solitary fibrous tumors of soft tissue. A clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical study of 12 cases. Am J Surg Pathol 199519:1257-1266.
46. Hasegawa T, Hirose T, Seki K, et al. Solitary fibrous tumor of the soft tissue. An immunohistochemical and ultrastructural study. Am J Clin Pathol 1996106:325-331.
47. Vallat-Decouvelaere AV, Dry SM, Fletcher CD. Atypical and malignant solitary fibrous tumors in extrathoracic locations: evidence of their comparability to intra-thoracic tumors. Am J Surg Pathol 199822:1501-1511.
48. Morimitsu Y, Nakajima M, Hisaoka M, Hashimoto H. Extrapleural solitary fibrous tumor: clinicopathologic study of 17 cases and molecular analysis of the p53 pathway. Apmis 2000108:617-625.
49. Nielsen GP, Dickersin GR, Provenzal JM, Rosenberg AE. Lipomatous hemangiopericytoma: A histologic, ultrastructural and immunohistochemical study of a unique variant of hemangiopericytoma. Am J Surg Pathol 199519:748-756.
50. Ceballos KM, Munk PL, Masri BA, O'Connell JX. Lipomatous hemangiopericytoma: a morphologically distinct soft tissue tumor. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1999123:941-945.
51. Folpe AL, Devaney K, Weiss SW. Lipomatous hemangiopericytoma: a rare variant of hemangiopericytoma that may be confused with liposarcoma. Am J Surg Pathol 199923:1201-1207.
52. Guillou L, Gebhard S, Coindre JM. Lipomatous hemangiopericytoma: a fat-containing variant of solitary fibrous tumor? Clinicopathologic, immunohistochemical, and ultrastructural analysis of a series in favor of a unifying concept. Hum Pathol 200031:1108-1115.
53. Chilosi M, Facchettti F, Dei Tos AP, et al. bcl-2 expression in pleural and extrapleural solitary fibrous tumours. J Pathol 1997181:362-367.
54. Suster S, Fisher C, Moran CA. Expression of bcl-2 oncoprotein in benign and malignant spindle cell tumors of soft tissue, skin, serosal surfaces, and gastrointestinal tract. Am J Surg Pathol 199822:863-872.
55. Renshaw AA. 013 (CD99) in spindle cell tumors. Reactivity with hemangiopericytoma, solitary fibrous tumor, synovial sarcoma and meningioma but rarely with sarcomatoid mesothelioma. Appl Immunohistochem 19953:250-256.
56. Dal Cin P, Pauwels P, Van Den Berghe H. Solitary fibrous tumour of the pleura with t(415)(q13q26). Histopathology 199935:94-95.
57. Donner LR, Silva MT, Dobin SM. Solitary fibrous tumor of the pleura: a cytogenetic study. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 1999111:169-171.
58. Havlik DM, Farnath DA, Bocklage T. Solitary fibrous tumor of the orbit with a t(922)(q31p13). Arch Pathol Lab Med 2000124:756-758.
59. de Saint Aubain Somerhausen N, Rubin BP, Fletcher CD. Myxoid solitary fibrous tumor: a study of seven cases with emphasis on differential diagnosis. Mod Pathol 199912:463-471.
60. Nielsen GP, O'Connell JX, Dickersin GR, Rosenberg AE. Solitary fibrous tumor of soft tissue: a report of 15 cases, including 5 malignant examples with light microscopic, immunohistochemical, and ultrastructural data. Mod Pathol 199710:1028-1037.
61. Stout AP, MR. M. Hemangiopericytoma. A vascular tumor featuring Zimmerman's pericytes. Ann Surg 1942116:26-33.
62. Stout AP. Hemangiopericytoma. A study of 25 new cases. Cancer 19492:1027-1054.
63. Nappi O, Ritter JH, Pettinato G, Wick MR. Hemangiopericytoma: histopathological pattern or clinicopathologic entity? Semin Diagn Pathol 199512:221-232.
64. Nehls V, Drenckhahn D. Heterogeneity of microvascular pericytes for smooth muscle type alpha- actin. J Cell Biol 1991113:147-154.
65. Schor AM, Canfield AE, Sutton AB, et al. Pericyte differentiation. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 1995:81-91.
66. Iwasaki H, Isayama T, Johzaki H, Kikuchi M. Malignant fibrous histiocytoma. Evidence of perivascular mesenchymal cell origin immunocytochemical studies with monoclonal anti-MFH antibodies. Am J Pathol 1987128:528-537.
67. Bonetti F, Pea M, Martignoni G, et al. The perivascular epithelioid cell and related lesions. Adv Anat Pathol 19976:343-358.
68. Dardick I, Hammar SP , Scheithauer BW. Ultrastructural spectrum of hemangiopericytoma: a comparative study of fetal, adult and neoplastic pericytes. Ultrastructural Pathol 198913:111-154.
69. Battifora H. Hemangiopericytoma: ultrastructural study of five cases. Cancer 197331:1418-1432.
70. Nemes Z. Differentiation markers in hemangiopericytoma. Cancer 199269:133-140.
71. Sarlomo-Rikala M, Kovatich AJ, Barusevicius A, Miettinen M. CD117: a sensitive marker for gastrointestinal stromal tumors that is more specific than CD34. Mod Pathol 199811:728-734.
72. Granter SR, Badizadegan K, Fletcher CD. Myofibromatosis in adults, glomangiopericytoma, and myopericytoma: a spectrum of tumors showing perivascular myoid differentiation. Am J Surg Pathol 199822:513-525.
73. Fisher C. Synovial sarcoma. Ann Diagn Pathol 19982:401-421.
74. Perez-Atayde AR, Kozakewich HW, McGill T, Fletcher JA. Hemangiopericytoma of the tongue in a 12-year-old child: ultrastructural and cytogenetic observations. Hum Pathol 199425:425-429.
75. Henn W, Wullich B, Thonnes M, et al. Recurrent t(1219)(q13q13.3) in intracranial and extracranial hemangiopericytoma. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 199371:151-154.
76. Limon J, Rao U, Dal Cin P, et al. Translocation (1322) in a hemangiopericytoma. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 198621:309-318.
77. Mandahl N, Örndal C, Heim S, et al. Aberrations of chromosome segment 12q13-15 characterize a subgroup of hemangiopericytomas. Cancer 199371:3009-3013.
78. Jankowski SA, Mitchell DS, Smith SH, et al. SAS, a Gene Amplified in Human Sarcomas, Encodes a New Member of the Transmembrane-4-Superfamily of Proteins. Oncogene 19949:1205-1211.
79. Enzinger FM, Smith BH. Hemangiopericytoma. An analysis of 106 cases. Hum Pathol 19767:61-82.
80. McMaster MJ, Soule EH, Ivins JC. Hemangiopericytoma. A clinicopathologic study and long-term followup of 60 patients. Cancer 197536:2232-2244.
81. Yu CC, Hall PA, Fletcher CD, et al. Haemangiopericytomas: the prognostic value of immunohistochemical staining with a monoclonal antibody to proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA). Histopathology 199119:29-33.
82. Eichhorn JH, Dickersin GR, Bhan AK, Goodman ML. Sinonasal hemangiopericytoma. A reassessment with electron microscopy, immunohistochemistry, and long-term follow-up. Am J Surg Pathol 199014:856-866.
83. Thompson LD, Miettinen M, Wenig BM. Sinonasal-type hemangiopericytoma: a clinicopathologic and immunophenotypic analysis of 104 cases showing perivascular myoid differentiation. Am J Surg Pathol 200327:737-749.
84. Tse LL, Chan JK. Sinonasal haemangiopericytoma-like tumour: a sinonasal glomus tumour or a haemangiopericytoma? Histopathology 200240:510-517.
85. Montgomery EA, Devaney KO, Giordano TJ, Weiss SW. Inflammatory myxohyaline tumor of distal extremities with virocyte or Reed-Sternberg-like cells: a distinctive lesion with features simulating inflammatory conditions, Hodgkin's disease, and various sarcomas. Mod Pathol 199811:384-391.
86. Michal M. Inflammatory myxoid tumor of the soft parts with bizarre giant cells. Pathol Res Pract 1998194:529-533.
87. Jurcic V, Zidar A, Montiel MD, et al. Myxoinflammatory fibroblastic sarcoma: a tumor not restricted to acral sites. Ann Diagn Pathol 20026:272-280.
88. Fletcher CDM, Unni KK, Mertens F. WHO Classification of Tumours. Tumours of Soft Tissue and Bone. Lyon, France: IARC 2002.
89. Lambert I, Debiec-Rychter M, Guelinckx P, et al. Acral myxoinflammatory fibroblastic sarcoma with unique clonal chromosomal changes. Virchows Arch 2001438:509-512.
90. Desmouliere A, Gabbiani G. The role of the myofibroblast in wound healing and fibrocontractive diseases. in The molecular and cellular biology of wound repair 2nd Edn Ed Clark RAF 1996:391-423.
91. Eyden BP, Ponting J, Davies H, et al. Defining the myofibroblast: normal tissues, with special reference to the stromal cells of Wharton's jelly in human umbilical cord. J Submicrosc Cytol Pathol 199426:347-355.
92. Gabbiani G, Ryan GB, Majno G. Presence of modified fibroblasts in granulation tissue and their possible role in wound contraction. Experientia 197127:549-550.
93. Tomasek JJ, Gabbiani G, Hinz B, et al. Myofibroblasts and mechano-regulation of connective tissue remodelling. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 20023:349-363.
94. Balercia G, Bhan AK, Dickersin GR. Sarcomatoid carcinoma: an ultrastructural study with light microscopic and immunohistochemical correlation of 10 cases from various anatomic sites. Ultrastructural Pathol 199519:249-263.
95. Darby I, Skalli O, Gabbiani G. a-smooth muscle actin is transiently expressed by myofibroblasts during experimental wound healing. Lab Invest 199063:21-29.
96. Gabbiani G. The cellular derivation and the life span of the myofibroblast. Pathol Res Pract 1996192:708-711.
97. Gabbiani G. The myofibroblast in wound healing and fibrocontractive diseases. J Pathol 2003200:500-503.
98. Desmouliere A, Geinoz A, Gabbiani F, Gabbiani G. Transforming growth factor-beta 1 induces alpha-smooth muscle actin expression in granulation tissue myofibroblasts and in quiescent and growing cultured fibroblasts. J Cell Biol 1993122:103-111.
99. Hinz B, Mastrangelo D, Iselin CE, et al. Mechanical tension controls granulation tissue contractile activity and myofibroblast differentiation. Am J Pathol 2001159:1009-1020.
100. Eyden B. The fibronexus in reactive and tumoral myofibroblasts: further characterisation by electron microscopy. Histol Histopathol 200116:57-70.
101. Skalli O, Gabbiani G, Babaï, et al. Intermediate filament proteins and actin isoforms as markers for soft tissue tumor differentiation and origin. II. Rhabdomyosarcomas. Am J Pathol 1988130:515-531.
102. Schürch W, Seemayer TA, Gabbiani G. Myofibroblast. In Sternberg SS, ed. Histology for Pathologists. 2nd Edn. New York, Raven Press 1997:129-165.
103. Eyden B. The myofibroblast: an assessment of controversial issues and a definition useful in diagnosis and research. Ultrastruct Pathol 200125:39-50.
104. Ceballos KM, Nielsen GP, Selig MK, O'Connell JX. Is anti-h-caldesmon useful for distinguishing smooth muscle and myofibroblastic tumors? An immunohistochemical study. Am J Clin Pathol 2000114:746-753.
105. Miettinen M. Are desmoid tumors kit positive? Am J Surg Pathol 200125:549-550.
106. Ghadially FN. Diagnostic Electron Microscopy of Tumours. London: Butterworths 1980. p136.
107. Lagace R, Seemayer TA, Gabbiani G, Schurch W. Myofibroblastic sarcoma. Am J Surg Pathol 199923:1432-1435.
108. Erlandson RA. Diagnostic Transmission Electron Microscopy of Tumors, with clinico-pathological, immunohistochemical and cytogenetic correlations. New York: Raven 1994.
109. Eyden BP, Christensen L, Tagore V, Harris M. Myofibrosarcoma of subcutaneous soft tissue of the cheek. J Submicrosc Cytol Pathol 199224:307-313.
110. Eyden B. Electron microscopy in the study of myofibroblastic lesions. Semin Diagn Pathol 200320:13-24.
111. Schurch W, Seemayer TA, Gabbiani G. The myofibroblast: a quarter century after its discovery. Am J Surg Pathol 199822:141-147.
112. Montgomery E, Fisher C. Myofibroblastic differentiation in malignant fibrous histiocytoma (pleomorphic myofibrosarcoma): a clinicopathological study. Histopathology 200138:499-509.
113. Miettinen MM, Sarlomo-Rikala M, Kovatich AJ, Lasota J. Calponin and h-caldesmon in soft tissue tumors: consistent h-caldesmon immunoreactivity in gastrointestinal stromal tumors indicates traits of smooth muscle differentiation. Mod Pathol 199912:756-762.
114. Stiller D, Katenkamp D. Cellular features in desmoid fibromatosis and well-differentiated fibrosarcomas: an electron microscopic study. Virchows Arch A Pathol Anat Histol 1975369:155-164.
115. Vasudev KS, Harris M. A sarcoma of myofibroblasts. An ultrastructural study. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1978102:185-188.
116. Crocker DJ, Murad TM. Ultrastructure of fibrosarcoma in a male breast. Cancer 196923:891-899.
117. d'Andiran G, Gabbiani G. A metastasizing sarcoma of the pleura composed of myofibroblasts. Prog Surg Pathol 19802:31-40.
118. Eyden BP, Banerjee SS, Harris M, Mene A. A study of spindle cell sarcomas showing myofibroblastic differentiation. Ultrastruct Pathol 199115:367-378.
119. Smith DM, Mahmoud HH, Jenkins JJ, 3rd, et al. Myofibrosarcoma of the head and neck in children. Pediatr Pathol Lab Med 199515:403-418.
120. Taccagni G, Rovere E, Masullo M, et al. Myofibrosarcoma of the breast: review of the literature on myofibroblastic tumors and criteria for defining myofibroblastic differentiation. Am J Surg Pathol 199721:489-496.
121. Bisceglia M, Magro G. Low-grade myofibroblastic sarcoma of the salivary gland. Am J Surg Pathol 199923:1435-1436.
122. Gocht A, Bosmuller HC, Bassler R, et al. Breast tumors with myofibroblastic differentiation: clinico-pathological observations in myofibroblastoma and myofibrosarcoma. Pathol Res Pract 1999195:1-10.
123. Mentzel T, Dry S, Katenkamp D, Fletcher CD. Low-grade myofibroblastic sarcoma: analysis of 18 cases in the spectrum of myofibroblastic tumors. Am J Surg Pathol 199822:1228-1238.
124. Montgomery E, Goldblum JR, Fisher C. Myofibrosarcoma: a clinicopathologic study. Am J Surg Pathol 200125:219-228.
125. Bisceglia M, Tricarico N, Minenna P, et al. Myofibrosarcoma of the upper jawbones: a clinicopathologic and ultrastructural study of two cases. Ultrastruct Pathol 200125:385-397.
126. Watanabe K, Ogura G, Tajino T, et al. Myofibrosarcoma of the bone: a clinicopathologic study. Am J Surg Pathol 200125:1501-1507.
127. Lucin K, Mustac E, Jonjic N. Breast sarcoma showing myofibroblastic differentiation. Virchows Arch 2003.
128. Kuhnen C, Homann HH, Mentzel T. [Myofibroblastic sarcoma of the thoracic wall. Change in appearance in tumour recurrence]. Pathologe 200324:128-135.
129. Fisher C, Goldblum JR, Montgomery E. Calponin and h-caldesmon in sarcomas of myofibroblasts. Mod Pathol 200316:11A.
130. Eyden BP, Christensen L. Leiomyosarcoma versus myofibrosarcoma: observations and terminology. Ultrastruct Pathol 199317:231-239.
131. Coffin CM, Watterson J, Priest JR, Dehner LP. Extrapulmonary inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor (inflammatory pseudotumor) - A clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical study of 84 cases. Am J Surg Pathol 199519:859-872.
132. Coffin CM, Humphrey PA, Dehner LP. Extrapulmonary inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor: a clinical and pathological survey. Semin Diagn Pathol 199815:85-101.
133. Meis JM, Enzinger FM. Inflammatory fibrosarcoma of the mesentery and retroperitoneum. A tumor closely simulating inflammatory pseudotumor. Am J Surg Pathol 199115:1146-1156.
134. Coffin CM, Dehner LP, Meis-Kindblom JM. Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor, inflammatory fibrosarcoma, and related lesions: an historical review with differential diagnostic considerations. Semin Diagn Pathol 199815:102-110.
135. Mirra M, Falconieri G, Zanconati F, Dibonito L. Inflammatory fibrosarcoma: Another imitator of Hodgkin's disease? Pathology Research and Practice 1996192:474-478.
136. Meis-Kindblom JM, Kjellstrom C, Kindblom LG. Inflammatory fibrosarcoma: update, reappraisal, and perspective on its place in the spectrum of inflammatory myofibroblastic tumors. Semin Diagn Pathol 199815:133-143.
137. Chan JK, Cheuk W, Shimizu M. Anaplastic lymphoma kinase expression in inflammatory pseudotumors. Am J Surg Pathol 200125:761-768.
138. Cessna MH, Zhou H, Sanger WG, et al. Expression of ALK1 and p80 in inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor and its mesenchymal mimics: a study of 135 cases. Mod Pathol 200215:931-938.
139. Cook JR, Dehner LP, Collins MH, et al. Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) expression in the inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor: a comparative immunohistochemical study. Am J Surg Pathol 200125:1364-1371.
140. Lawrence B, Perez-Atayde A, Hibbard MK, et al. TPM3-ALK and TPM4-ALK oncogenes in inflammatory myofibroblastic tumors. Am J Pathol 2000157:377-384.
141. Bridge JA, Kanamori M, Ma Z, et al. Fusion of the ALK gene to the clathrin heavy chain gene, CLTC, in inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor. Am J Pathol 2001159:411-415.
142. Donner LR, Trompler RA, White RRt. Progression of inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor (inflammatory pseudotumor) of soft tissue into sarcoma after several recurrences. Hum Pathol 199627:1095-1098.
143. Biselli R, Boldrini R, Ferlini C, et al. Myofibroblastic tumours: neoplasias with divergent behaviour. Ultrastructural and flow cytometric analysis. Pathol Res Pract 1999195:619-632.
144. Hussong JW, Brown M, Perkins SL, et al. Comparison of DNA ploidy, histologic, and immunohistochemical findings with clinical outcome in inflammatory myofibroblastic tumors. Mod Pathol 199912:279-286.