—  SHORT COURSE #54  —

Diagnosing Extranodal Lymphomas in the New Millennium

Wednesday, March 10, 2004
Marsha C. Kinney and Steven H. Swerdlow




Click on each blue title within the Agenda below to navigate to that section
Agenda
Introduction to the extranodal lymphomas
Update on classification of the non-Hodgkin lymphomas -- from Rappaport to the 21st century
B-cell lymphomas at extranodal sites
Case 1: Gastric extranodal marginal zone B-cell lymphoma of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) type
Case 2: Colonic mantle cell lymphoma (multiple lymphomatous polyposis)
Case 3: Salivary gland extranodal marginal zone B-cell lymphoma of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) type
Case 4: Splenic marginal zone lymphoma
T/NK cell lymphomas at extranodal sites
Case 5: Hepatosplenic T-cell lymphoma
Case 6: Subcutaneous panniculitis-like T-cell lymphoma
Case 7: Primary cutaneous anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL)
Case 8: Nasal/Nasal type NK/T-cell lymphoma
Selected References for this Summary Page

Click on each case number below to display the text and references for that case
Click on any thumbnail images for an enlarged view of that slide
B-cell Lymphomas at Extranodal Sites

Case 1 - Text and References

Diagnosis:
Gastric Extranodal Marginal Zone B-cell Lymphoma of Mucosa-associated Lymphoid Tissue (Malt Lymphoma)

Clinical Summary:

A 62 year old male with mass in stomach.


Case 1 - Figure 1 - Extranodal marginal zone B-cell lymphoma of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) type in stomach. There is a mucosal and submucosal pale appearing lymphoid infiltrate that surrounds occasional hyperplastic follicular centers.

Case 1 - Figure 2 - Extranodal marginal zone B-cell lymphoma of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) type in stomach. A higher magnification of Figure 1.


Case 1 - Figure 3 - Extranodal marginal zone B-cell lymphoma of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) type in stomach. Note the lymphoepithelial lesion.

Case 1 - Figure 4 - Extranodal marginal zone B-cell lymphoma of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) type in stomach. See the "centrocyte-like" pale cells characteristic of MALT lymphomas.



Case 2 - Text and References

Diagnosis:
Mantle Cell Lymphoma (multiple lymphomatous polyposis)

Clinical Summary:

A 77 year old male with chronic diarrhea & anemia. Biopsy is from "random" colon biopsies. Similar process also present in sigmoid colon & terminal ileum.


Case 2 - Figure 1 - Mantle cell lymphoma in colonic biopsy (multiple lymphomatous polyposis). There is a very vaguely nodular and diffuse dense lymphoid infiltrate.

Case 2 - Figure 2 - Mantle cell lymphoma in colonic biopsy (multiple lymphomatous polyposis). The infiltrate is composed of small lymphoid cells. A gland shows some infiltration by lymphocytes.

Case 2 - Figure 3 - Mantle cell lymphoma in colonic biopsy (multiple lymphomatous polyposis), paraffin immunoperoxidase. The positive cyclin D1 stain confirms the diagnosis here of a mantle cell lymphoma.



Case 3 - Text and References

Diagnosis:
Parotid Gland Extranodal Marginal Zone B-cell Lymphoma of Mucosa-associated Lymphoid Tissue (Malt Lymphoma)

Clinical Summary:

A 70 year old female with painless mobile mass in right parotid area for
6 months. No facial paralysis.


Case 3 - Figure 1 - Extranodal marginal zone B-cell lymphoma of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) type in parotid. Most of the salivary gland is replaced by a dense lymphoid infiltrate with large confluent pale areas seen at low magnification.

Case 3 - Figure 2 - Extranodal marginal zone B-cell lymphoma of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) type in parotid. Note the lymphoepithelial lesions (LEL) with numerous pale lymphoid cells. These centrocyte-like/monocytoid-appearing cells extend beyond the LEL and form confluent sheets. Also see the hyperplastic follicular centers.

Case 3 - Figure 3 - Extranodal marginal zone B-cell lymphoma of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) type in parotid. See the lymphoepithelial lesion associated with the neoplastic centrocyte-like/monocytoid-appearing lymphoid cells. Some transformed cells are also present.



Case 4 - Text and References

Diagnosis:
Splenic Marginal Zone Lymphoma

Clinical Summary:

A 70 year old female with questionable history of lymphoma in marrow. Chest and abdominal CT scans remarkable only for splenomegaly. Splenectomy performed and revealed a 930 gm spleen.


Case 4 - Figure 1 - Splenic marginal zone lymphoma in spleen. There are prominent biphasic white pulp nodules with a core of smaller darker appearing lymphoid cells surrounded by a paler marginal zone. In addition, there are small nodules in the red pulp.

Case 4 - Figure 2 - Splenic marginal zone lymphoma in spleen. See the biphasic nature of one of the white pulp nodules.

Case 4 - Figure 3 - Splenic marginal zone lymphoma in spleen. The smaller lymphocytes with little cytoplasm that comprise the core of the white pulp nodules are seen on the left. Most of the figure depicts the marginal zone that includes larger cells with more cytoplasm and more dispersed chromatin. Occasional transformed cells are also present.

T/NK Cell Lymphomas at Extranodal Sites

Case 5 - Text and References

Diagnosis:
Hepatosplenic Lymphoma

Clinical Summary:

52 year old male initially presenting with anemia, thrombocytopenia and normal leukocyte number/differential and splenomegaly. Splenectomy revealed a "hematopoietic/lymphoid neoplasm, unclassified". Marrow examination was negative except for a mild lymphocytosis. The patient was followed and at one year developed hepatomegaly. An open liver biopsy was performed.


Case 5 - Figure 1 - Hepatosplenic T-cell lymphoma, liver. Liver sinuses are expanded by a monomorphic population of lymphocytes. There is little involvement of portal triads (Upper right).

Case 5 - Figure 2 - Hepatosplenic T-cell lymphoma, liver. The lymphocytes are medium to large and have partially dispersed chromatin and indistinct, pale cytoplasm.


Case 5 - Figure 3 - Hepatosplenic T-cell lymphoma, liver, paraffin immunoperoxidase, antibody polyclonal-anti CDS. The lymphocytes are CD3+.

Case 5 - Figure 4 - Hepatosplenic T-cell lymphoma, spleen. The red pulp is expanded by a homogeneous population of medium-sized lymphocytes with preferential localization to the sinuses.



Case 6 - Text and References

Diagnosis:
Subcutaneous Panniculitis-like T-cell Lymphoma (SCPTCL).

Clinical Summary:

A 71 year old male with nodules on arms and abdomen.


Case 6 - Figure 1 - Subcutaneous panniculitis-like T-cell lymphoma, skin/soft tissue. Tumor cells infiltrate subcutaneous tissue in a lobular pattern. Areas of fat necrosis are present.

Case 6 - Figure 2 - Subcutaneous panniculitis-like T-cell lymphoma, skin/soft tissue. Tumor cells rim the fat cells and partially invade a small vessel. Most tumor cells are medium to large and have hyperchromatic, irregular nuclei. Focal areas of fat necrosis are present (Upper right).

Case 6 - Figure 3 - Subcutaneous panniculitis-like T-cell lymphoma, skin/soft tissue. Macrophages are prominent in areas of necrosis and some show erythrophagocytosis.



Case 7 - Text and References

Diagnosis:
Primary Cutaneous Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma (ALCL)

Clinical Summary:

A 90 year old male with pink, waxy nodular lesion, right shoulder.


Case 7 - Figure 1 - Primary cutaneous anaplastic large cell lymphoma, skin biopsy. Tumor cells diffusely efface the dermis with sparing of the epidermis.

Case 7 - Figure 2 - Primary cutaneous anaplastic large cell lymphoma, skin biopsy. The tumor cells are large, pleomorphic and have a high mitotic rate.


Case 7 - Figure 3 - Primary cutaneous anaplastic large cell lymphoma, skin biopsy, paraffin immunoperoxidase, antibody Ber-h-12. The tumor cells have strong CD30 expression in a membrane and Golgi pattern.

Case 7 - Figure 4 - Primary cutaneous anaplastic large cell lymphoma, skin biopsy, paraffin immunoperoxidase, antibody ALK1. The tumor cells are ALK1 negative (left panel) with a positive control (right panel).



Case 8 - Text and References

Diagnosis:
Nasal/Nasal Type NK/T-cell Lymphoma

Clinical Summary:

A 43 year old female with one year history of skin lesions. Biopsy of paranasal sinus.


Case 8 - Figure 1 - Nasal NK/T-cell lymphoma, paranasal sinus biopsy. Large areas of necrosis are present in the soft tissue.

Case 8 - Figure 2 - Nasal NK/T-cell lymphoma, paranasal sinus biopsy. Higher magnification reveals infiltration and destruction of a vessel by large, dysplastic tumor cells with hyperchromatic nuclei.


Case 8 - Figure 3 - Nasal NK/T-cell lymphoma, paranasal sinus biopsy, paraffin immunoperoxidase, antibody Beta-F1. The tumor cells lack expression of T cell receptor beta chain. A small reactive lymphocyte is positive.

Case 8 - Figure 4 - Nasal NK/T-cell lymphoma, paranasal sinus biopsy, paraffin immunoperoxidase, antibody T1A-1. Tumor cells express the cytolytic granule protein TIA-1.


Introduction to extranodal lymphomas [2, 4]

Extranodal lymphomas are of great interest as they are common and will be seen by both general surgical pathologists and hematopathologists. Furthermore, many of the more recent changes in lymphoma classification deal with extranodal lymphomas and the recognition of important entities with clinical and biologic implications. Neither this short course, nor this handout, aim to cover this entire topic which is covered in detail in the published proceedings of the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine/Society for Hematopathology workshop on extranodal hematopoietic/lymphoid disorders and in the excellent textbook on extranodal lymphomas by Isaacson and Norton. [1, 2] Both references are aging but rather gracefully. The monograph describing the WHO classification of tumors of the hematopoietic and lymphoid tissues is another extremely important resource. [3]

This short course aims to approach the topic of extranodal lymphomas from an up-to-date but practical perspective.

Extranodal lymphomas: definition

Traditional: Lymphomas that are restricted to a single extranodal site ± its contiguous lymph node group.
Isaacson & Norton (1994): Extranodal lymphomas are those that present "with the main bulk of disease at an extranodal site, usually necessitating the direction of treatment primarily to that site." [2]

Frequency of extranodal lymphomas

~25-40% of all lymphomas are of extranodal type.
The incidence of extranodal lymphomas is increasing, like with other lymphomas, not just related to the AIDS epidemic or revised criteria for their recognition.
Immunodeficiency-associated lymphomas/ lymphoproliferative disorders do commonly involve extranodal sites and changes in the criteria for many of the extranodal lymphomas do mean that many of yesterday's pseudolymphomas are today's low grade lymphomas.

Sites of involvement

Reported frequency of involvement at different sites varies but GI tract is the most common site (especially stomach) followed by skin and Waldeyer's ring.

Classification

Whereas most extranodal lymphomas used to be categorized together with the nodal non-Hodgkin's lymphomas, now many extranodal lymphomas are categorized as distinct entities. The major exception to this is the relatively common extranodal lymphomas of large B-cell type that are not officially separately designated at the current time.
Classic nodal lymphomas can involve extranodal sites, eg, follicular lymphomas, mantle cell lymphomas, etc!




Lymphoma Classification in the New Millennium

In order to deal with extranodal lymphomas in 2004, one must be able to use the most recent lymphoma classifications. Understanding some of the older classifications is also important in being familiar with the wide range of terminology used today, being able to communicate with a broad spectrum of clinicians and comprehending some of the very critical concepts that are now taken for granted but that were considered controversial in the past. The older classifications are listed, reviewed and discussed in many different texts. [5]

Major lymphoma classifications of the last three decades

Rappaport
Functional classifications: Lukes/Collins & Kiel
NCI Working Formulation
REAL classification
WHO classification

The strictly morphologic Rappaport classification of the 1950s/1960s was followed in the 1970s by the two functional classifications that recognized that malignant lymphomas are neoplasms of the immune system and therefore should be related to the normal cells and compartments of the immune system. Although differently organized in their initial forms, the Lukes/Collins and Kiel classifications were felt to be essentially concordant by their authors. [6, 7, 8] Both were updated in the 1980s. The Lukes/Collins classification divided lymphomas based on their "cell of origin" meaning the normal lymphoid counterpart that most closely resembled the neoplastic cells. [7] Lymphomas therefore were divided first into those of B- or T-cell origin and then further subdivided based on what type of B- or T-cell they most closely resembled using the knowledge that existed more than 25 years ago. The only extranodal lymphoma specifically recognized was mycosis fungoides/Sezary syndrome.

Originally intended as a formulation for translating terminology from one classification into another, the NCI Working Formulation published in 1982 became a very widely used classification based on morphology and survival data from patients from the 1970s. [9] The seeming simplicity of the classification which had three clinical grades (low, intermediate and high) and ten types of lymphoma was embraced by many even though its short comings were well recognized from the start. Aside from the fact that the Working Formulation rejects the basic premise that tumors should be classified based on their cell type (eg, chondrosarcoma versus osteogenic sarcoma), the grades and even specific categories have become insufficient, in at least selected circumstances, for optimal therapeutic and/or prognostic purposes. Some distinct clinicopathologic entities are included in more than one category and some categories include more than one distinct clinicopathologic entity. Furthermore the working formulation is inconsistent with the trend towards more targeted therapies, for example using anti-CD20 antibodies.

Growing dissatisfaction with the NCI Working Formulation, together with major advances in the fields of immunology and neoplastic hematology, led to the "revised" European-American lymphoma (REAL) classification that was published by the International Lymphoma Study Group in 1994. [10]

In 2001, a larger group of hematopathologists, together with a Clinical Advisory Committee, published a new World Health Organization classification in an extensively illustrated monograph entitled "Pathology and Genetics of Tumours of Haematopoietic and Lymphoid Tissues". [3] Although based on the premise that the overriding necessity in a lymphoma classification is to recognize clinicopathologic entities rather than just be biologically correct, the WHO classification initially divides lymphomas into whether they are of B- or T/NK-cell origin, then into whether they are composed of precursor (lymphoblastic) or mature lymphoid cells, and finally into more specific entities.

Working Formulation type clinical grading is not recognized in the WHO (or REAL) classification. This means that the precise type of lymphoma becomes more important. Rejection of lymphoma grades was agreed to by the clinicians of the WHO Clinical Advisory Committee.

The WHO classification is on the following page. Note that more than ten of the categories of lymphoma in the WHO classification represent extranodal lymphomas.


Some examples of diagnostic decisions considered important in 2004 that cannot be dealt with using the NCI Working Formulation and which are discussed in this short course include:

Recognition of marginal zone B-cell lymphomas of MALT type and of splenic type.
Recognition of mantle cell lymphomas.
Recognition of some specific types of mature T-cell lymphomas with well documented clinical features, eg subcutaneous panniculitis-like T-cell lymphoma.
Recognition of anaplastic large cell lymphomas (cutaneous & systemic).

WHO classification of lymphomas - Summary [3]

B-CELL NEOPLASMS
Precursor B-cell neoplasm
Precursor B-lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma (precursor B-cell ALL)
Mature B-cell neoplasms
Chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma
B-cell prolymphocytic leukemia
Lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma
Splenic marginal zone B-cell lymphoma
Hairy cell leukemia
Plasma cell myeloma
Solitary plasmacytoma of bone
Extraosseous plasmacytoma
Extranodal marginal zone B-cell lymphoma of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT-lymphoma)
Nodal marginal zone B-cell lymphoma
Follicular lymphoma
Mantle cell lymphoma
Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma
Mediastinal (thymic) large B-cell lymphoma
Intravascular large B-cell lymphoma
Primary effusion lymphoma
Burkitt lymphoma/leukemia
B-cell proliferations of uncertain malignant potential
Lymphomatoid granulomatosis
Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder, polymorphic
T AND NK-CELL NEOPLASMS
Precursor T-cell neoplasms
Precursor T-lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma (precursor T-cell ALL)
Blastic NK cell lymphoma
Mature T-cell and NK-cell neoplasms
T-cell prolymphocytic leukemia
T-cell large granular lymphocytic leukemia
Aggressive NK-cell leukemia
Adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma
Extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma, nasal-type
Enteropathy-type T-cell lymphoma
Hepatosplenic T-cell lymphoma
Subcutaneous panniculitis-like T-cell lymphoma
Mycosis fungoides
Sezary syndrome
Primary cutaneous anaplastic large cell lymphoma
Peripheral T-cell lymphoma, unspecified
Angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma
Anaplastic large cell lymphoma
T-cell proliferation of uncertain malignant potential
Lymphomatoid papulosis
HODGKIN LYMPHOMA
Nodular lymphocyte predominant Hodgkin lymphoma
Classical Hodgkin lymphoma
Nodular sclerosis classical Hodgkin lymphoma
Lymphocyte-rich classical Hodgkin lymphoma
Mixed cellularity classical Hodgkin lymphoma
Lymphocyte depleted classical Hodgkin lymphoma




T/NK Cell Lymphomas at Extranodal Sites

T/NK-Cell Lymphomas at Extranodal Sites T- cell lymphomas are difficult to diagnose for several reasons:

They are relatively rare in the Western world, representing only 10-15% of lymphomas overall.
Even after excluding mycosis fungoides, almost one-third of T-cell lymphomas occur as primary tumors in extranodal sites where the diagnosis may be unsuspected initially and delayed due limited workup on the front end.
There are no specific cytologic or morphologic correlates of T-cell origin such as follicular nodulation or plasmacytic differentiation in B cell neoplasms; prior to recent classification systems, T-cell neoplasms were included in the heterogeneous categories diffuse mixed small and large cell or large cell immunoblastic.
Most T-cell lymphomas do not have a specific immunophenotype.
There are no immunologic markers of T-cell clonality; pan T-cell antigen loss is useful in identifying an abnormal T-cell population.
The ontogeny from naive to effector T-cell is largely obscure. T-cells and their neoplasms are biologically complex consisting of populations with ab and gd receptors and helper and suppressor/cytotoxic phenotypes; also NK -cells resemble T-cells in antigen expression, function, and patterns of disease.

The WHO classification has made several important contributions in classifying T-cell lymphomas:

Emphasized that extranodal lymphomas are extrinsically different from their nodal counterparts
Integrated clinical features (particularly site of disease) with more traditional pathologic criteria in defining lymphomas
Introduced NK cell neoplasms into the classification scheme

We have selected four cases to illustrate some of the common clinical and pathologic features of extranodal T-cell lymphomas and discuss difficulties in their diagnosis

Common features of extranodal T-cell lymphomas include: [11, 11a]

A broad cytologic spectrum with variability from pleomorphic mixed small, medium or large cells to large cell predominant
Clinical features, particularly anatomic site, are important in disease definition.
Immunophenotype in most cases is not specific.
Tumors spread to or relapse at extranodal sites; nodal involvement is infrequent.
Most have a cytotoxic T-cell or NK-cell phenotype with frequent apoptosis and/or necrosis.
Increased incidence of a hemophagocytic syndrome.
EBV positivity correlates with anatomic site and geographic features.

To provide a foundation for understanding T and NK-cell neoplasms, our discussion will begin with a brief review of their biology.

T-Cell and NK-Cell Biology [11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21]
Figure 1 is a simple illustration of T-cell and NK-cell differentiation:


From Kinney, MC, 1999 [13]

Most T-cells express the ab T-cell receptor (TCR) protein and have a helper (CD4+) or suppressor/cytotoxic (CD8+) phenotype. A small population of T-cells express the gd TCR and usually have a double negative (CD4-CD8-) phenotype, although some may express CD8, or more rarely, CD4. Normal gd T-cells are preferentially located at extranodal sites such as the splenic red pulp, gastrointestinal tract, and skin.

NK cells arise from a pluripotential cell and are related to T-cells, but at some point they branch off to form a separate lineage. [12] NK cells are distinguished immunologically by the absence of TCR gene rearrangements and TCR protein expression and lack of surface CD3 (Leu-4). NK cells and T cells can express

CD2, CD7, and in paraffin sections cytoplasmic CD3 (the episilon chain), CD45RO and CD43. Most NK-cells are CD4-CD8- followed by CD4-CD8+. NK-cells usually express one or more "NK-associated" antigens (CD11b, CD16, CD56, CD57), but some populations of NK-cells do not express these antigens and are identified by functional studies. A subset of cytotoxic T-cells also expresses NK associated antigens (see Table 1).

NK-cells and a subset of T-cells function as cytotoxic cells. Cytotoxic cells can be divided into three groups based on immunologic, molecular, and functional characteristics (see Table 1).

Table 1. Classification of Cytotoxic Cells According to Immunophenotype, Molecular, and Functional Parameters
Parameter T NK-Like T NK
NK antigen - + +*
Cytoplasmic CD3(epsilon chain) + + +/-
Surface CD3 + + -
CD4, CD8 CD8+>>>CD4+ CD8+>CD4-CD8->>CD4+ CD4-CD8+/-
TCRab, g/d† + + -
Cytotoxic granules + + +
Killing mechanism MHC restricted Non-MHC restricted Non-MHC restricted

TCR = T-cell receptor
MHC = major histocompatibility complex
* Some populations lack NK cell antigens
†TCR gene rearrangement and protein expression
From Kinney MC, 1999 [13]


Most cytotoxic T-cells recognize antigen on target cells in the context of major histocompatibility complex (MHC) antigens leading to specific killing. Most are CD8+ and recognize class I MHC molecules; a minor population is CD4+ and recognizes class II MHC molecules. The majority of cytotoxic T-cells express the ab TCR and a small number are gd T-cells. A subset of cytotoxic T-cells are "NK-like", express NK antigens, and kill target cells in a non-MHC restricted manner. [14, 15, 16] NK-cells have broader reactivity than T- cells in that they do not require previous exposure to antigen, and the target cell does not have to express MHC molecules. Recent evidence indicates NK-cells do recognize MHC class I, and if present on the target cell, lysis by NK-cells is inhibited. If MHC class I molecules are decreased, absent, or altered (as frequently occurs in tumors or virus infected cells), NK-cell lysis is activated. [17] The two main groups of NK-cell receptors that recognize HLA class I molecules are C-type lectin receptors (NKG2 and CD94) and immunoglobulin superfamily receptors that include killer immunoglobulin-like receptors (KIRs) and others. [17a] These receptors are not specific for NK-cells and can be expressed on a subset of T-cells.

Cytotoxic cells have two main effector mechanisms of killing their target either through activation of the Fas-Fas-L (CD95L) apoptotic pathway or by release of cytotoxic granules (perforin [membranolytic protein], granzymes [apoptotic protein], or TIA-1 [RNA binding protein]) that lead to osmotic cell lysis or apoptotic DNA fragmentation of the target cell. [18, 19, 20, 21]

NK-cells or cytotoxic T-cells may be the first line of defense at mucosal sites and the skin and they are more common in these sites. It is not surprising that many extranodal lymphomas arising in these areas are tumors of cytotoxic lymphocytes.

Immunophenotyping T- and NK-cells and their neoplasms:
In recent years many antibodies useful in identifying T-cells, their subsets and NK-cells have been developed that are reactive in fixed tissue (Table 2). Although these antibodies are useful in determining the cell of origin of a neoplastic process, the immunophenotype of most T-or NK-cell neoplasms is not specific except where pathogenetic markers (ie, ALK protein in systemic anaplastic large cell lymphoma) have been developed. Diagnosis of T or NK cell neoplasms requires a combination of clinical, morphologic and immunophenotypic data. Some markers, such as CD56, may have prognostic significance.

Table 2. Paraffin Reactive Antibodies Useful in Characterizing T and NK-cells
CD Number Antibody/Source Principal Reactivity
CD3 CD3(polyclonal)/DAKO T-cells, activated NK cells
CD45RO UCHL-1/DAKO Memory T-cells
CD43 Leu-22(L60),MT1/Becton-Dickinson, DAKO, BioGenex T-cells, myeloid cells, B-cell subset
-- bF-1 /EndoGen ab T-cells
-- TCR-gd/EndoGen gd T-cells
CD4 CD4/Novocastra Helper T-cells, monocytes
CD8 CD8/DAKO Suppressor/cytotoxic T cells; NK cell subset
-- TIA-1/Coulter Cytotoxic T cells, NK cells
-- Granzyme B/Monosan Activated cytotoxic T cells, NK cells
CD56 123C3/Zymed NK cells and some cytotoxic T cells
CD57 Leu-7/Becton-Dickinson Cytotoxic T-cells and some NK cells
-- ALK-1/DAKO ALCL; small subset B cell lymphomas; neural tissue; inflammatory myofibroblastic tumors
-- EMA/multiple vendors Epithelial cells, ALCL, LPHD, plasma cells

Initially a screening panel is performed that includes B and T-cell markers. Usually two T- cell markers are included (we use CD3 and CD45RO, UCHL-1) as some T-cell antigens are not expressed in T-cell neoplasms. Various combinations of the antibodies listed in Table 2 are used to further define individual neoplasms.

NK-cells and NK-like T-cells may be difficult to distinguish; a comparison of their immunophenotypes is listed in Table 3.

Table 3. Immunophenotypic Comparison of NK-like T-cells and NK-cells
NK-like T-cell NK-cell
CD2+ CD2+/-
cytoplasmic CD3+ cytoplasmic CD3+/-
surface CD3+* surface CD3-
CD4-/+ CD4-
CD8+ CD8+/-
CD5+/- CD5-
CD7+ CD7+/-
CD16+/- CD16+/-
CD57+/- CD57+/-
CD56+/- CD56+
TCRab+ or less frequently gd+ TCRab- and gd-

* may be absent in some T cell neoplasms

A summary of the characteristic immunophenotypic features of extranodal T/NK-cell tumors is listed in Table 4.

Table 4. Characteristic Immunophenotype of Extranodal T/NK-Cell Neoplasms:
Lymphoma Type T-cell Subset CD56 Cytotoxic Proteins CD30 EBV Cell Type
Hepatosplenic CD4-CD8->CD8+ + + * -/+ - gd>>ab
SCPTCL CD8+>CD4-CD8->CD4+ -/+ + +/- - ab>gd
ALCL, primary cutaneous CD4+>CD4-CD8->CD8+ -/+ *** +/- + - ** ab>gd
Nasal/nasal type NK/T cell CD8+>CD4-CD8- + + +/- + NK>gd>ab
Aggressive NK leukemia CD8+,CD4-CD8- + + NT +/- NK
Intestinal CD4-CD8->CD8+>CD4+ -/+ + +/- -/+ ab>gd>>NK
Blastic NK cell lymphoma CD4 + + NT - NK

Modified from Kinney, 1999 [13]; + = 50%-100%; +/- = 25%-49%; -/+ = 5%-24%; - = <5%
* - most cases have a non-activated phenotype (TIA-1+, granzyme B-, perforin-)
** - based on nodal cases
NT - not tested
*** - wide range (12%-75%) of cases tested




References
  1. Swerdlow SH ed Extranodal Hematopoietic/Lymphoid Disorders. In: Linder J ed. Pathology Patterns Supplement to the American Journal of Clinical Pathology. Vol. 111. Chicago: American Society of Clinical Pathologists; 1999
  2. Isaacson PG, Norton AJ. Extranodal Lymphomas. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 1994
  3. Jaffe ES, Harris NL, Stein H, Vardiman JW eds. Pathology and Genetics of Tumours of Haematopoietic and Lymphoid Tissues. In: Kleihues P, Sobin LH eds. World Health Organization Classification of Tumours. Lyon: IARC Press; 2001
  4. Burke JS. Extranodal hematopoietic/lymphoid disorders. An introduction. American Journal of Clinical Pathology. 1999;111:S40-45
  5. Swerdlow S. Biopsy Interpretation of Lymph Nodes. In: Steven G. Silverberg MD ed. Biopsy Interpretation series. New York: Raven Press; 1992
  6. Lennert K, Collins RD, Lukes RJ. Concordance of the Kiel and Lukes-Collins classifications of non-Hodgkin's lymphomas. Histopathology. 1983;7:549-559
  7. Lukes RJ, Collins RD. Immunologic characterization of human malignant lymphomas. Cancer. 1974;34:suppl:1488-1503
  8. Gerard-Marchant R, Hamlin I, Lennert K, Rilke F, Stansfeld AG, van Unnik JAM. Classification of non-Hodgkin's Lymphomas. Lancet. 1974;2:406-408
  9. Anonymous. National Cancer Institute sponsored study of classifications of non-Hodgkin's lymphomas: summary and description of a working formulation for clinical usage. The Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma Pathologic Classification Project. Cancer. 1982;49:2112-2135
  10. Harris NL, Jaffe ES, Stein H, Banks PM, Chan JK, Cleary ML, Delsol G, De Wolf-Peeters C, Falini B, Gatter KC. A revised European-American classification of lymphoid neoplasms: a proposal from the International Lymphoma Study Group [see comments]. Blood. 1994;84:1361-1392
  11. Jaffe ES, Krenacs L, Kumar S, Kingma DW, Raffeld M. Extranodal peripheral T-cell and NK-cell neoplasms. Am J Clin Pathol 111 (Suppl 1):S46-S55, 1999.
  12. Jaffe ES, Krenacs L, Raffeld M. Classification of cytotoxic T-cell and natural killer cell lymphomas. Semin Hematol 40:175-84, 2003
  13. Spits H, Lanier LL, Phillips JH. Development of human T and natural killer cells. Blood 85:2654-70, 1995.
  14. Kinney MC. The role of morphologic features, phenotype, genotype, and anatomic site in defining extranodal T-cell or NK-cell neoplasms. Am J Clin Pathol 111 (Suppl. 1):S104-S118, 1999.
  15. Lanier LL, Le AM, Civin CI, Loken MR, Phillips JH. The relationship of CD16 (Leu-11) and Leu-19 (NKH-1) antigen expression on human peripheral blood NK cells and cytotoxic T lymphocytes. J Immunol 136:4480-86, 1986.
  16. David V, Bourge J-F, Guglielmi P, Mathieu-Mahul C, Degos L, Bensussan A. Human T cell clones use a CD3-associated surface antigen recognition structure to exhibit both NK-like and allogeneic cytotoxic reactivity. J Immunol 138:2831-36, 1987.
  17. MacDonald HR. NK1.1+ T cell receptor-a /b + cells: new clues to their origin, specificity, and function. J Exp Med 182:633-38, 1995.
  18. Moretta L, Biassoni R, Bottino C, Mingari MC, Moretta A. Human NK-cell receptors. Immunol Today 21:420-422, 2000.
  19. Hoffmann T, De Libero G, Colonna M, Wodnar-Filipowicz A, Passweg J, Favre G, Gratwohl A, Tichelli A. Natural killer-type receptors for HLA class I antigens are clonally expressed in lymphoproliferative disorders of natural killer and T-cell type. Br J Haematol 110:525-536, 2000.
  20. Takayama H, Kojima H, Shinohara N. Cytotoxic T lymphocytes: the newly identified Fas (CD95)-mediated killing mechanism and a novel aspect of their biological functions. Adv Immunol 60:289-321, 1995.
  21. Cerottini J-C, Tschopp J. New knowledge about T-cell cytotoxicity. Ann Oncol 8 (suppl 2):S75-S78, 1997.
  22. Anderson P. TIA-1: structural and functional studies on a new class of cytolytic effector molecule. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol198:131-43, 1995.
  23. Froelich CJ, Dixit VM, Yang X. Lymphocyte granule-mediated apoptosis: matters of viral mimicry and deadly proteases. Immunol Today 19:30-36, 1998.