—  ENDOCRINE PATHOLOGY SOCIETY   —

Role of Immunohistochemical Markers in the Diagnosis of Follicular Patterned Lesions of the Thyroid


Sylvia L. Asa
University of Toronto
Toronto, ON, Canada


The Scope of The Problem

The Thyroid Nodule
Thyroid nodules are extremely common in the general population; it has been estimated that about 20% of the population has a palpable thyroid nodule and approximately 70% has a nodule that can be detected by ultrasound [1]. The prevalence of thyroid nodules is greater in women (72%) than in men (41%). Multiple nodules are more common than solitary nodules.

The differential diagnosis of the thyroid nodule includes numerous entities, non-neoplastic and neoplastic, benign and malignant [2, 3, 4, 5] . This remains an area fraught with controversy and diagnostic criteria are highly variable from Pathologist to Pathologist [6, 7, 8, 9, 10] . The last few years have seen attempts to identify the sources of discrepancy in histological diagnosis. Since this remains the gold standard against which we measure outcomes of cytology, intraoperative consultations, molecular and other studies, it is imperative that we achieve consensus. However it is clear that consensus is elusive and no current morphologic criteria provide adequate information to predict outcome for the vast majority of follicular nodules of thyroid. This is, therefore, a field in need of objective, scientific markers that better characterize these lesions than has been possible by classical morphology.

The clinical management of these lesions can be difficult and controversial. The pathologist has an important role to play in their evaluation. The use of fine needle aspiration biopsy has significantly improved our ability to identify specific high-risk disorders and to facilitate their management in an expeditious and cost-effective manner. Patients who require surgery for further confirmation of the disease process rely upon the pathologist to correctly characterize their nodule. Advances in our understanding of the molecular basis of thyroid cancer will allow the identification of better markers and more accurate characterization of specific subtypes of neoplasia and malignancy even on single cells obtained at fine needle aspiration biopsy. This should further enhance the usefulness of this technique and better guide the management of patients with a thyroid nodule.

Nodular Hyperplasia
Sporadic nodular goitre is characterized by numerous follicular nodules with heterogeneous architecture and cytology, features that have suggested a hyperplastic rather than neoplastic pathogenesis [11, 12, 13, 14] . Nevertheless, the morphologic classification of cellular follicular nodules in nodular glands can be extremely difficult. Hyperplasia may be extremely difficult to distinguish from neoplasia. For the most part, large nodules in multinodular glands tend to be incompletely encapsulated and poorly demarcated from the internodular tissue. However, in some glands, large encapsulated lesions with relatively monotonous architecture and cytology make distinction of hyperplasia from adenoma difficult. Many pathologists have applied nonspecific terms such as "adenomatoid nodules" to describe such lesions

Molecular studies have indicated that the dominant nodules of multinodular goiters are monoclonal proliferations, and therefore represent benign neoplasms [12, 15] . It may be that these represent true adenomas arising in the background of a hyperplastic process. Moreover, most hyperfunctioning nodules are also now thought to represent clonal benign neoplasms with activating mutations of the TSH receptor or Gsa [16, 17] . The evidence of clonal proliferation in sporadic nodular goitre and the identification of ras mutations as early events in morphologically classified hyperplastic nodules in this disorder [18] indicates that the thyroid is a site for the hyperplasia-neoplasia sequence.

The neoplastic nature of these lesions raises the possibility of malignant transformation, and event that is rarely recognized clinically, since the vast majority of nodular goiters remain entirely clinically benign. However, it is important to recognize such malignant transformation, and this may be very difficult in the setting of nodular hyperplasia. This is an area where immunohistochemical markers would prove very useful.

Follicular Adenoma
Solitary follicular nodules have been unequivocally shown to be monoclonal [19, 20] and in the absence of invasive behavior or of markers of papillary carcinoma, these lesions are considered to be benign. Follicular adenomas can be classified histologically according the size or presence of follicles and degree of cellularity. The subclassification of follicular adenomas into simple, microfollicular, trabecular, oxyphil, atypical, papillary and signet ring cell types has no prognostic significance.

Atypical adenomas are highly cellular tumors with unusual gross and/or histologic appearances that suggest the possibility of malignancy but these tumors lack evidence of invasion. They may have necrosis, infarction, numerous mitoses or unusual cellularity. Many so-called "atypical adenomas" are indeed papillary carcinomas. The distinction of an encapsulated follicular variant papillary carcinoma from follicular adenoma relies on cytologic characteristics. The presence of the cytologic features of papillary carcinoma should indicate that diagnosis, despite lack of invasion, however, this is a highly subjective area that exhibits the most inconsistency in diagnostic pathology [10].

Whether some follicular nodules classified histologically as adenomas have the biologic potential to become carcinoma is not clear; aneuploid cell populations have been described in a significant percentage of these lesions, suggesting that some of these may represent carcinoma in situ.

Follicular Carcinoma
Follicular adenoma and most follicular carcinomas are indistinct with respect to their clinical presentation, radiographic appearance, cytologic findings and microscopic features. In most cases, the parenchymal component of both tumour types is essentially the same histomorphologically. The distinction between these two conditions has been considered possible only by recognition of invasion or metastasis. As indicated above, some encapsulated follicular adenomas exhibit evidence of aneuploidy and may in fact represent in situ follicular carcinomas.

Nuclear and cellular atypia and mitotic figures may be present in adenomas as well as in carcinomas and therefore cytologic characteristics are not helpful. Follicular carcinoma can only be diagnosed by the demonstration of capsular and/or vascular invasion. Follicular carcinomas are divided into groups that reflect the biology of tumour growth and metastasis. Widely invasive follicular carcinomas, which are usually identifiable as invasive grossly, and certainly are not difficult to recognize as invasive microscopically, carry a poor prognosis with a 25-45% ten year survival [21, 22] . In our experience, these tend to be insular carcinomas. In contrast, the more common scenario is that of minimal capsular invasion and patients with these tumors have an excellent prognosis. The diagnosis of follicular neoplasms requires very careful and thorough examination of the entire capsule of the follicular neoplasm by the pathologist [23]. Minimally invasive follicular carcinoma is identified by invasion through but not widely beyond the capsule. Borderline lesions include those with invasion into the capsule beyond the bulk of the lesion but not through the full thickness of the capsule. This represents another area of controversy with varying thresholds for the diagnosis of malignancy.

The concept of unencapsulated follicular carcinoma was raised by the identification of tumors that lack a capsule. In one report of four such cases, one patient developed metastases, and this gave rise to citations of a 25% metastatic rate by such lesions [24]. However, this has not been substantiated in larger series and this concept has largely been abandoned.

Patients with minimally invasive follicular carcinomas are on average about 10 years younger than those with widely infiltrative carcinomas and since traces of capsule are found in about 24% of widely invasive lesions, it is possible that encapsulated follicular carcinoma is a precursor of the widely invasive lesion [25]. Minimally invasive carcinomas have ten year survival rates of 70-100% [26] and therefore some argue that this disease does not warrant the painstaking search for microscopic invasion that distinguishes it from follicular adenoma. Nevertheless, the investigators that have reported these promising data have treated their patients for carcinoma rather than for benign disease. Rather than endorsing a cavalier approach that would entail less work for the pathologist, it behooves us to recognize the presence of potential malignancy, to treat the patient appropriately [27], but also to identify the excellent prognosis that these lesions carry after appropriate management.

Vasculoinvasive follicular carcinomas are aggressive and require management accordingly. While vascular invasion is more reliable for the diagnosis of malignancy, again the criteria are vague. Vascular invasion cannot be evaluated within the tumour and therefore again the circumference of the lesion is the site that warrants careful examination. Bulging of tumour under endothelium does not qualify as vascular invasion if the endothelium is intact. Nests of tumour cells within an endothelial lumen generally are accepted as representing invasion. However, it is recognized that artefactual implantation of tumour cells into blood vessels can occur during the surgical procedure or sectioning. Therefore, endothelium covering invasive tumour cells or thrombus adherent to intravascular tumour is required to distinguish true invasion from artefact.

The significance of this diagnosis must be interpreted in light of clinical data that assess the behavior of this disorder. The dominant determinant of cause-specific mortality in patients with follicular carcinoma is the presence of distant metastases [28, 29, 30] . Most studies have indicated that morbidity and mortality for patients with non-metastatic encapsulated follicular carcinoma is very low and correlates better with patient age than with any other parameter. Some have suggested that capsular invasion alone does not alter the incidence of distant metastases or cancer-related death.

Since the incidence of follicular carcinoma is low [31], most investigators still advocate total thyroidectomy and radioactive iodine therapy [27, 32, 33] . The rationale for total thyroidectomy is not bilateral carcinoma; multifocal disease in follicular carcinoma is exceedingly rare and the identification of occult papillary carcinoma in the contralateral lobe is not an indication for further surgery [34]. The only logical rationale for completion thyroidectomy is to allow selective uptake of radioactive iodine by metastatic tumour deposits rather than by residual thyroid gland. Uptake of radioactive iodine by distant metastases is a favorable prognostic factor and is improved by pre-therapeutic total thyroidectomy, resulting in improved survival [35, 35, 36, 37] . In contrast, external beam radiotherapy is not thought to be of use in patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma, apart from those with locally advanced tumors such as widely invasive follicular carcinomas that involve extrathyroidal soft tissues of the neck and cannot be completely resected [37].

The last few decades have seen a decrease in the incidence of follicular thyroid carcinoma, probably due to dietary iodine supplementation [31]. However, misdiagnosis of this tumour continues. Benign lesions, such as partly encapsulated hyperplastic nodules or nodules exhibiting pseudo-invasion after fine needle aspiration [38], are often over-diagnosed as malignant; papillary carcinomas with follicular architecture are often misinterpreted as follicular carcinoma. The clinical features, pathophysiology and biological behavior of follicular cancer differ significantly from those of the entities with which it is often confused. Only careful histopathologic classification will allow correct evaluation of treatment options and prognosis.

Papillary Carcinoma
Papillary carcinoma comprises at least 80% of thyroid epithelial malignancies diagnosed in regions of the world where goiters are not endemic. The terminology is misleading; papillary carcinomas can exhibit papillary architecture but they may also have follicular or mixed papillary and follicular patterns [3, 5, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46] . It is now recognized that the diagnosis of papillary carcinoma is based on what the WHO has described as "a distinctive set of nuclear characteristics" [2]. In contrast to true follicular carcinomas, these lesions are usually more indolent and most have an excellent prognosis with a 20 year survival rate of 90% or better [35, 47, 48] . When these lesions do invade, they show preference for lymphatic involvement with a high percentage of regional lymph node metastases. Metastases beyond the neck are unusual in common papillary carcinoma and probably only occur in about 5 to 7% of cases.

The most useful prognostic markers in papillary carcinoma are patient variables, tumour size and extent of disease [21, 22, 35, 49] . Patients under the age of 45 usually have an excellent prognosis; in contrast those over 45 years of age generally have a poorer outlook. Sex has also been said in the past to be an important determinant of tumour biology but more recent studies have suggested that there is no major difference in the behavior of papillary carcinoma in men compared to women. Tumour size is exceedingly important [50]. Tumors less than 1 cm are common [51] and appear to be different biologically than larger tumors [52, 53, 54] . In contrast, tumors greater than 1 cm are thought to be of clinical significance and those larger than 3 cm generally have a poorer prognosis than do smaller tumors. The presence of cervical lymph node metastasis, whether microscopic or identified clinically, is thought to increase the risk of recurrence of disease but has been shown to have no impact on mortality. Extrathyroidal extension, in contrast, predicts a worse prognosis and the presence of distant metastases is the hallmark of an aggressive tumour that will bear the potential for high mortality.

The follicular variant of papillary carcinoma has been recognized more frequently in the past 20 years [2, 3, 5, 55, 56, 57] . This lesion comprises more than 50% of papillary cancers in our experience. It has either been misdiagnosed as follicular carcinoma or under-diagnosed as follicular adenoma or atypical adenoma. Any lesion with follicular architecture and characteristic nuclear features of papillary carcinoma should be classified as this tumor. However, the threshold for this diagnosis is extremely inconsistent [6, 7, 8, 9, 10] . The presence of cytologic atypia may raise the possibility of papillary carcinoma without being sufficiently convincing for unequivocal diagnosis. In such cases, specific markers of this tumour as well as other markers if malignancy may be useful.

The management of the less aggressive forms of papillary thyroid carcinoma is controversial. Most experts advocate total thyroidectomy and radioactive iodine therapy [27, 33] . The rationale for total thyroidectomy is twofold, based on the frequency of bilateral carcinoma and on the need for enhancement of uptake of radioactive iodine by metastatic tumour deposits rather than residual thyroid tissue. However, as shown by the studies of Sugg et al [58], the identification of occult papillary carcinoma in the contralateral lobe is usually not attributable to intrathyroidal dissemination, which would justify further surgery for local disease. Therefore, the major indications for total thyroidectomy are the enhancement of uptake of radioactive iodine and the more sensitive use of thyroglobulin to detect persistent disease [35, 36, 37] . The controversy involves the management of patients with low risk clinical and pathological parameters; some have advocated less aggressive management with unilateral thyroidectomy and no radioiodine therapy in this setting [32]. There is a clear need for potential markers of those rare more aggressive tumors that will metastasize to local lymph nodes to stratify patients for completion thyroidectomy and radioiodine therapy. Since there are no controlled clinical trials that address this issue, the answer remains an empirical one. As for follicular carcinoma, external beam radiotherapy is not used in patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma, apart from those with locally advanced tumors that involve extrathyroidal soft tissues of the neck and cannot be completely resected [37, 49] .

The Role of Immunohistochemistry
It is obvious that the diagnosis of malignancy in well-differentiated encapsulated follicular-patterned tumors rests on subjective criteria. The search for objective markers of malignancy is therefore of great importance and reliable candidates will prove very useful for diagnosis and patient management.

The search has yielded one very specific but highly enigmatic candidate. HBME-1, a marker of mesothelial cells, is immunohistochemically detected in more than 40% of thyroid follicular malignancies of papillary or follicular differentiation [59, 60, 61] and has been used successfully in cytology studies as well as histopathologic evaluation of thyroid nodules [60, 61] . The problem with this marker is that is identifies an unknown antigen.

Recent studies have advocated the use of galectin-3 as another marker of malignancy [62, 63, 64] . However, this has not been a reliable marker in the hands of some investigators [65]. In our experience this marker also stains normal, hyperplastic and inflamed thyroid tissue, but positivity in malignancies is more diffuse and strong. These data should limit the application of this technique for cytology but this has not been widely recognized [66].

Stains for high molecular weight cytokeratins, particularly cytokeratin 19 (CK19) may be useful to diagnose a follicular-patterned papillary carcinoma. This technique, also considered controversial [67, 68] , has been shown to be useful when applied to paraffin sections with microwave antigen retrieval [69] . The results of these studies indicate that moderate to strong diffuse staining is confined to papillary carcinoma whereas follicular neoplasms and hyperplastic nodules are negative or show only focal staining in areas of reaction to degeneration or previous fine needle aspiration biopsy. Nevertheless, only approximately 60% of papillary carcinomas are positive; a positive stain is therefore helpful, but negative stains are unable to assist in the diagnostic process.

The diagnosis of papillary carcinoma has been further advanced by the recognition of a family of gene rearrangements that are specific to papillary carcinoma [70]. The ret/PTC oncogenes (1 through 15, depending on the site of rearrangement, reviewed in [71] ) are the result of DNA damage with rearrangements that transpose various cellular genes adjacent to the gene encoding the intracellular tyrosine kinase domain of the ret protooncogene [72, 73, 74, 75, 76] . The rearrangements result in constitutive tyrosine kinase activation and translocation of the fusion protein to the cytoplasm [77]. Animal models have shown the tumorigenicity of these fusion proteins [78, 79] ; the rearrangements are common in radiation-induced tumors [80, 81, 82, 83, 84] but are also found in sporadic papillary carcinomas [85, 86, 87, 88] and appear to be an early event in tumour development [89]. Immunohistochemical staining with antisera directed against the carboxy terminus of ret allows rapid and clinically useful detection of this marker of papillary carcinoma which is present in almost 80% of occult papillary microcarcinomas and approximately 50% of clinically detected lesions [58]. Again, a negative stain is not useful. At the moment, antisera or antibodies to ret offer inconsistent detection of these rearrangements and molecular diagnostics using RT-PCR remain the gold standard of this diagnostic tool. This methodology has been applied to FNA specimens when collected in suspension [90] and application of this technique enhances the cytological diagnosis of papillary carcinoma.

The diagnosis of Hürthle cell follicular variant papillary carcinoma remains controversial. Many of these lesions have been diagnosed in the past as Hürthle cell adenoma, however, reports of aggressive behavior suggested that this diagnosis could not be trusted [91, 92] . The application of ret/PTC analysis by RT-PCR allowed recognition of a follicular variant of Hürthle cell papillary carcinoma as a group of lesions with no invasive behavior at the time of diagnosis but that harbored a ret/PTC gene rearrangement [93, 94] . Many of these lesions exhibit irregularity of architecture with hypereosinophilic colloid and nuclear features of papillary carcinoma, but these can be obscured by the hyperchromasia and prominent nucleoli of oncocytic change. Nevertheless, they can be recognized when there is a high index of suspicion and with the addition of immunohistochemistry for HBME-1, galectin-3, CK19 and ret. These tumors have the potential to metastasize [95], explaining the occurrence of malignancy in patients with a histopathological diagnosis of adenoma. This concept requires a re-evaluation of the approach to oncocytic lesions of thyroid [96], including the application of other markers of malignancy such as HBME-1 and galactin-3 [97].

More recently, activating mutations in BRAF were identified as another common feature of papillary thyroid carcinomas [98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106] . All of the mutations thus far described in this disorder affect nucleotide 1796 in exon 15, resulting in a thymidine to adenine transversion which translates into a valine to glutamate substitution at residue 599. Interestingly, classical papillary carcinomas have a high incidence of this mutation, but it seems to be rare in follicular variant lesions that are more of a diagnostic dilemma, and a few of these lesions have been reported to harbor a mutation of residue 600 [105]. BRAF belongs to the RAF family of serine/threonine kinases and is located downstream of Ras and upstream of mek in the classical MAPK signaling cascade, and since this pathway is activated by tyrosine kinase receptors including ret, it likely results in convergence of altered signal transduction. However, this molecular alteration, while highly specific, cannot be detected by immunohistochemistry as yet. Similarly, telomerase activity has been identified as a diagnostic and prognostic factor in thyroid tumors [107, 108] , but there is as yet no immunohistochemical test for this application.

The controversy concerning the management of patients with low risk clinical and pathological parameters revolves around the indication for less aggressive management with unilateral thyroidectomy and no radioiodine therapy in this setting [32]. Recent studies have identified potential markers of those more aggressive tumors that will metastasize to local lymph nodes, including loss of nuclear p27 and upregulation of cyclin D1 [109, 110, 111] and these may prove valuable to stratify patients for completion thyroidectomy and radioiodine therapy, but more studies are needed to validate these data. Another prognostic marker in papillary carcinoma is loss of bcl-2 protein [112].

Another molecular marker with application to prognostication of follicular carcinoma is a gene rearrangement that involves the thyroid transcription factor Pax 8 and the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor g (PPARg) gene [113]. Normal thyroid follicular cells express Pax 8 at high levels; this transcription factor is essential for thyroid development, involved in regulating expression of the endogenous genes encoding thyroglobulin, thyroperoxidase, and the sodium/iodide symporter. PPAR g , a transcription factor that is implicated in the inhibition of cell growth and promotion of cell differentiation, is also expressed by normal thyroid follicular epithelium. However, this in-frame rearrangement results in a fusion protein that likely interferes with the normal function of both differentiating factors, thereby explaining its potential role in thyroid tumorigenesis. The rearrangement is most reliably detected using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) technology to identify the translocation of the two genes that are normally localized on chromosomes 2q13 (Pax 8) and 3p25 (PPAR g ). The presence of overexpressed protein can also be identified using immunostains for PPARg where strong nuclear staining identifies tumors harboring a translocation. Although follicular carcinomas of thyroid are rare [31], and the numbers of cases studied has been small, it appears to be a useful tool for the diagnosis of malignancy in thyroid follicular lesions, particularly to predict vascular spread and aggressive behavior [114]. Nevertheless, it remains controversial, with some reports of positivity in benign lesions [115, 116] , and some studies have shown correlation with malignancy but better prognosis [117].

Other markers that may have potential for more accurate diagnosis and therapy of thyroid lesions include hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) and its receptor met [118], thyroid peroxidase (TPO) [119], CITED-1 [120], cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) and thromboxane [121], CD44V6 and CD 57 [122], CD82 [123], HMGI(Y) [124], MUC1 [125] and the novel S100C [126].

It is evident that no single marker can identify all malignant follicular-patterned lesions, therefore various combinations of markers have been proposed. The use of HBME-1, high molecular weight cytokeratins and ret provides a set of immunohistochemical markers that aids in the diagnosis of papillary carcinoma in equivocal cases [127]. Other combinations have also been suggested, including galactin-3 and TPO [119], galactin-3, fibronectin-1, CITED-1, HBME-1 and CK19 [128] .

As these and other markers are characterized and validated, directed in the future by molecular profiling of thyroid lesions with characteristic morphology, behavior and outcome [129], they will become available as routine immunohistochemical markers that will provide a more accurate, scientific and clinically relevant consultation report from the pathologist for cytology and surgical pathology procedures.

References

  1. Ezzat S, Sarti DA, Cain DR and Braunstein GD. Thyroid incidentalomas. Prevalence by palpation and ultrasonography. Arch Intern Med 154: 1838-1840, 1994.

  2. Hedinger C, Williams ED and Sobin LH. The WHO histological classification of thyroid tumors: A commentary on the second edition. Cancer 63: 908-911, 1989.

  3. LiVolsi VA. Surgical Pathology of the Thyroid. Philadelphia, P.A.: W.B. Saunders, 1990.

  4. Murray D. The thyroid gland. In: Functional Endocrine Pathology, edited by Kovacs K and Asa SL. Boston: Blackwell Science, 1998, p. 295-380.

  5. Rosai J, Carcangiu ML and DeLellis RA. Tumors of the Thyroid Gland. Atlas of Tumor Pathology, Third Series, Fascicle 5. Washington, D.C.: Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, 1992.

  6. Saxen E, Franssila K, Bjarnason O, Normann T and Ringertz N. Observer variation in histologic classification of thyroid cancer. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand [A] 86A: 483-486, 1978.

  7. Hirokawa M, Carney JA, Goellner JR, DeLellis RA, Heffess CS, Katoh R, Tsujimoto M and Kakudo K. Observer variation of encapsulated follicular lesions of the thyroid gland. Am J Surg Pathol 26: 1508-1514, 2002.

  8. Fassina AS, Montesco MC, Ninfo V, Denti P and Masarotto G. Histological evaluation of thyroid carcinomas: reproducibility of the "WHO" classification. Tumori 79: 314-320, 1993.

  9. Franc B, de la SP, Lange F, Hoang C, Louvel A, de Roquancourt A, Vilde F, Hejblum G, Chevret S and Chastang C. Interobserver and intraobserver reproducibility in the histopathology of follicular thyroid carcinoma. Hum Pathol 34: 1092-1100, 2003.

  10. Lloyd RV, Erickson LA, Casey MB, Lam KY, Lohse CM, Asa SL, Chan JK, DeLellis RA, Harach HR, Kakudo K, LiVolsi VA, Rosai J, Sebo TJ, Sobrinho-Simoes M, Wenig BM and Lae ME. Observer variation in the diagnosis of follicular variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 28: 1336-1340, 2004.

  11. Studer H, Peter H-J and Gerber H. Natural heterogeneity of thyroid cells: The basis for understanding thyroid function and nodular goiter growth. Endocr Rev 10: 125-135, 1989.

  12. Aeschimann S, Kopp PA, Kimura ET, Zbaeren J, Tobler A, Fey MF and Studer H. Morphological and functional polymorphism within clonal thyroid nodules. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 77: 846-851, 1993.

  13. Studer H and Ramelli F. Simple goiter and its variants: Euthyroid and hyperthyroid multinodular goiters. Endocr Rev 3: 40-61, 1982.

  14. Peter HJ, Gerber H, Studer H and Smeds S. Pathogenesis of heterogeneity in human multinodular goiter. A study on growth and function of thyroid tissue transplanted onto nude mice. J Clin Invest 76: 1992-2002, 1985.

  15. Apel RL, Ezzat S, Bapat B, Pan N, LiVolsi VA and Asa SL. Clonality of thyroid nodules in sporadic goiter. Diag Mol Pathol 4: 113-121, 1995.

  16. Parma J, Duprez L, Van SandemH, Hermans J, Rocmans P, Van Vliet G, Bostagliola S, Rodien P, Dumont JE and Vassart G. Diversity and prevalence of somatic mutations in the thyrotropin receptor and Gs alpha genes as a cause of toxic thryoid adenomas. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 82: 2695-2701, 1997.

  17. Krohn D, Fuhrer D, Holzapfel H and Paschke R. Clonal origin of toxic thyroid nodules with constitutively activating thyrotropin receptor mutations. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 83: 180-184, 1998.

  18. Ezzat S, Zheng L, Kholenda J, Safarian A, Freeman JL and Asa SL. Prevalence of activating ras mutations in morphologically characterized thyroid nodules. Thyroid 6: 409-416, 1996.

  19. Hicks DG, LiVolsi VA, Neidich JA, Puck JM and Kant JA. Clonal analysis of solitary follicular nodules in the thyroid. Am J Pathol 137: 553-562, 1990.

  20. Namba H, Matsuo K and Fagin JA. Clonal composition of benign and malignant human thyroid tumors. J Clin Invest 86: 120-125, 1990.

  21. Treseler PA and Clark OH. Prognostic factors in thyroid carcinoma. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 6: 555-598, 1997.

  22. Clark OH. Predictors of thyroid tumor aggressiveness. West J Med 165: 131-138, 1996.

  23. Yamashina M. Follicular neoplasms of the thyroid. Total circumferential evaluation of the fibrous capsule. Am J Surg Pathol 16: 392-400, 1992.

  24. Kahn NF and Perzin KH. Follicular carcinoma of the thyroid: An evaluation of the histologic criteria used for diagnosis. Pathol Annu 1: 221-253, 1983.

  25. Jorda M, Gonzalez-Campora R, Mora J, Herrero-Zapatero A, Otal C and Galera H. Prognostic factors in follicular carcinoma of the thyroid. Arch Pathol Lab Med 117: 631-635, 1993.

  26. van Heerden JA, Hay ID, Goellner JR, Salomao D, Ebersold JR, Bergstralh EJ and Grant CS. Follicular thyroid carcinoma with capsular invasion alone: A nonthreatening malignancy. Surgery 112: 1130-1138, 1992.

  27. Harness JK, Thompson NW, McLeod MK, Eckhauser FE and Lloyd RV. Follicular carcinoma of the thyroid gland: Trends and treatment. Surgery 96: 972-980, 1984.

  28. Samaan NA, Schultz PN, Haynie TP and Ordonez NG. Pulmonary metastasis of differentiated thyroid carcinoma: Treatment results in 101 patients. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 65: 376-380, 1985.

  29. DeGroot LJ, Kaplan EL, Shukla MS, Salti G and Straus FH. Morbidity and mortality in follicular thyroid cancer. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 80: 2946-2953, 1995.

  30. Mizukami Y, Michigishi T, Nonomura A, Hashimoto T, Terahata S, Noguchi M, Hisada K-I and Matsubara F. Distant metastases in differentiated thyroid carcinomas: A clinical and pathologic study. Hum Pathol 21: 283-290, 1990.

  31. LiVolsi VA and Asa SL. The demise of follicular carcinoma of the thyroid gland. Thyroid 4: 233-235, 1994.

  32. Shah JP, Loree TR, Dharker D and Strong EW. Lobectomy versus total thyroidectomy for differentiated carcinoma of the thyroid: a matched-pair analysis. Am J Surg 166: 331-335, 1993.

  33. Singer PA, Cooper DS, Daniels GH, Ladenson PW, Greenspan FS, Levy EG, Braverman LE, Clark OH, McDougall IR, Ain KV and Dorfman SG. Treatment guidelines for patients with thyroid nodules and well-differentiated thyroid cancer. American Thyroid Association. Arch Intern Med 156: 2165-2172, 1996.

  34. Pasieka JL, Thompson NW, McLeod MK, Burney RE and Macha M. The incidence of bilateral well-differentiated thyroid cancer found at completion thyroidectomy. World J Surg 16: 711-717, 1992.

  35. Mazzaferri EL and Jhiang SM. Long-term impact of initial surgical and medical therapy on papillary and follicular thyroid cancer. Am J Med 97: 418-428, 1994.

  36. Benker G, Olbricht Th, Reinwein D, Reiners C, Sauerwein W, Krause U, Mlynek ML and Hirche H. Survival rates in patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma. Influence of postoperative external radiotherapy. Cancer 65: 1517-1520, 1990.

  37. Tsang RW, Brierley JD, Simpson WJ, Panzarella T, Gospodarowicz MK and Sutcliffe SB. The effects of surgery, radioiodine, and external radiation therapy on the clinical outcome of patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma. Cancer 82: 375-388, 1998.

  38. LiVolsi VA and Merino MJ. Worrisome histologic alterations following fine needle aspiration of the thyroid. Pathol Annu 29: 99-120, 1994.

  39. Vickery AL. Thyroid papillary carcinoma. Pathological and philosophical controversies. Am J Surg Pathol 7: 797-807, 1983.

  40. Vickery AL, Carcangiu ML, Johannessen JV and et al. Papillary carcinoma. Semin Diagn Pathol 2: 90-100, 1985.

  41. Rosai J, Zampi G, Carcangiu ML, Pupi A and et al. Papillary carcinoma of the thyroid. Am J Surg Pathol 7: 809-817, 1983.

  42. Carcangiu ML, Zampi G, Pupi A, Castagnoli A and Rosai J. Papillary carcinoma of the thyroid. A clinicopathologic study of cases treated at the University of Florence Italy. Cancer 805: 822, 1985.

  43. LiVolsi VA. Papillary neoplasms of the thyroid. Pathologic and prognostic features. Am J Clin Pathol 97: 426-434, 1992.

  44. Carcangiu ML, Zampi G and Rosai J. Papillary thyroid carcinoma: A study of its many morphologic expressions and clinical correlates. Pathol Annu 20: 1-44, 1985.

  45. Bocker W, Schroder S and Dralle H. Minimal thyroid neoplasia. Rec Results Cancer Res 106: 131-138, 198.

  46. Carcangiu ML, Zampi G and Rosai J. Papillary thyroid carcinoma: A study of its many morphologic expressions and clinical correlates. Pathol Annu 20 (Part 1): 1-44, 1985.

  47. Hay ID. Papillary thyroid carcinoma. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 19: 545-576, 1990.

  48. Mazzaferri E and Jhiang S. Long-term follow-up impact of initial surgical and medical therapy on papillary and follicular thyroid cancer. Am J Med 97: 418-428, 1994.

  49. Brierley JD, Panzarella T, Tsang RW, Gospodarowicz MK and O'Sullivan B. A comparison of different staging systems predictability of patient outcome. Thyroid carcinoma as an example. Cancer 79: 2414-2423, 1997.

  50. Noguchi M, Tanaka S, Akiyama T and et al. Clinicopathological studies of minimal thyroid and ordinary thyroid cancers. Jpn J Surg 13: 110-117, 1984.

  51. Fink A, Tomlinson G, Freeman JL, Rosen IB and Asa SL. Occult micropapillary carcinoma associated with benign follicular thyroid disease and unrelated thyroid neoplasms. Mod Pathol 9: 816-820, 1996.

  52. Harach HR, Franssila KO and Wasenius V-M. Occult papillary carcinoma of the thyroid. A "normal" finding in Finland. A systematic autopsy study. Cancer 56: 531-538, 1985.

  53. Yamashita H, Noguchi S, Murkama N and et al. Prognosis of minute carcinoma of the thyroid. Follow-up study of 48 patients. Acta Pathol Jpn 36: 1469-1475, 1986.

  54. Yamashita H, Nakayama I, Noguchi S, Murakami N, Moriuchi A, Yokoyama S, Mochizuki Y and Noguchi A. Thyroid carcinoma in benign thyroid diseases. An analysis from minute carcinoma. Acta Pathol Jpn 35: 781-788, 1985.

  55. Chen KTK and Rosai J. Follicular variant of thyroid papillary carcinoma: A clinicopathologic study of six cases. Am J Surg Pathol 1: 123-130, 1977.

  56. Tielens ET, Sherman SI, Hruban RH and et al. Follicular variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma; a clinicopathologic study. Cancer 73: 424-431, 1994.

  57. Hedinger C, Williams ED and Sobin LH. Histological typing of thyroid tumours. World Health Organization International Histological Classification of Tumours. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1988.

  58. Sugg SL, Ezzat S, Rosen IB, Freeman J and Asa SL. Distinct multiple ret/PTC gene rearrangements in multifocal papillary thyroid neoplasia. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 83: 4116-4122, 1998.

  59. Miettinen M and Karkkainen P. Differential reactivity of HBME-1 and CD15 antibodies in benign and malignant thyroid tumours. Preferential reactivity with malignant tumours. Virchows Arch 429: 213-219, 1996.

  60. Sack MJ, Astengo-Osuna C, Lin BT, Battifora H and LiVolsi VA. HBME-1 immunostaining in thyroid fine-needle aspirations: a useful marker in the diagnosis of carcinoma. Mod Pathol 10: 668-674, 1997.

  61. van Hoeven KH, Kovatich AJ and Miettinen M. Immunocytochemical evaluation of HBME-1, CA 19-9, and CD-15 (Leu-M1) in fine-needle aspirates of thyroid nodules. Diagn Cytopathol 18: 93-97, 1997.

  62. Fernandez PL, Merino MJ, Gomez M, Campo E, Medina T, Castronovo V, Sanjuan X, Cardesa A, Liu F-T, Sobel ME and . Galectin-3 and laminin expression in neoplastic and non-neoplastic thyroid tissue. J Pathol 181: 80-86, 1997.

  63. Orlandi F, Saggiorato E, Pivano G, Puligheddu B, Termine A, Cappia S, De Giuli P and Angeli A. Galectin-3 is a presurgical marker of human thyroid carcinoma. Cancer Res 58: 3015-3020, 1998.

  64. Cvejic D, Savin S, Paunovic I, Tatic S, Havelka M and Sindinovic J. Immuhohistochemical localization of galectin-3 in malignant and benign human thyroid tissue. Anticancer Res 18: 2637-2642, 1998.

  65. Mehrotra P, Okpokam A, Bouhaidar R, Johnson SJ, Wilson JA, Davies BR and Lennard TW. Galectin-3 does not reliably distinguish benign from malignant thyroid neoplasms. Histopathology 45: 493-500, 2004.

  66. Inohara H, Honjo Y, Yoishii T, Akahani S, Yoshida J, Hattori K, Okamoto S, Sawada T, Raz A and Kubo T. Expression of galectin-3 in fine-needle aspirates as a diagnostic marker differentiating benign from malignant thyroid neoplasms. Cancer 85: 2475-2484, 1999.

  67. Sahoo S, Hoda SA, Rosai J and DeLellis RA. Cytokeratin 19 immunoreactivity in the diagnosis of papillary thyroid carcinoma: a note of caution. Am J Clin Pathol 116: 696-702, 2001.

  68. Asa SL and Cheung CC. The mind's eye. Am J Clin Pathol 116: 635-636, 2001.

  69. Raphael SJ, Apel RL and Asa SL. Detection of high-molecular-weight cytokeratins in neoplastic and non-neoplastic thyroid tumors using microwave antigen retrieval. Mod Pathol 8: 870-872, 1995.

  70. Santoro M, Carlomagno F, Hay ID, Herrmann MA, Grieco M, Melillo R, Pierotti MA, Bongarzone I, Della Porta G, Berger N, Peix JL, Paulin C, Fabien N, Vecchio G, Jenkins R and Fusco A. Ret oncogene activation in human thyroid neoplasms is restricted to the papillary cancer subtype. J Clin Invest 89: 1517-1522, 1992.

  71. Tallini G and Asa SL. RET oncogene activation in papillary thyroid carcinoma. Adv Anat Pathol 8: 345-354, 2001.

  72. Fusco A, Grieco M, Santoro M, Berlingieri MT, Pilotti S, Pierotti MA, Della Porta G and Vecchio G. A new oncogene in human thyroid papillary carcinomas and their lymph-nodal metastases. Nature 328: 170-172, 1987.

  73. Pierotti MA, Santoro M, Jenkins RB, Sozzi G, Pilotti S, Tunnacliffe A and Bongarzone I. Characterization of an inversion on the long arm of chromosome 10 juxtaposing D10S170 and RET and creating the oncogenic sequence RET/PTC. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89: 1616-1620, 1992.

  74. Minoletti F, Butti Mg, Coronelli S, Miozzo M, Sozzi G, Pilotti S, Tunnacliffe A, Pierotti MA and Bongarzone I. The two genes generating RET/PTC3 are localized in chromosomal band 10q11.2. Genes, Chromosmes & Cancer 11: 51-57, 1994.

  75. Sozzi G, Bongarzone I, Miozzo M, Borrello MG, Blutti MG, Pilotti S, Della PG and Pierotti MA. A t(10;17) translocation creates the RET/PTC2 chimeric transforming sequence in papillary thyroid carcinoma. Genes, Chromosomes & Cancer 9: 244-250, 1994.

  76. Jhiang SM and Mazzaferri EL. The ret/PTC oncogene in papillary thyroid carcinoma [Review]. J Lab Clin Med 123: 331-337, 1994.

  77. Ishizaka Y, Shima H, Sugimura T and Nagao M. Detection of phosphorylated ret/TPC oncogene product in cytoplasm. Oncogene 7: 1441-1444, 1992.

  78. Jhiang SM, Sagartz JE, Tong Q, Parker-Thronburg J, Capen CC, Cho JY, Xing S and Ledent C. Targeted expression of the ret/PTC1 oncogene induces papillary thyroid carcinomas. Endocrinology 137: 375-378, 1996.

  79. Santoro M, Chiappetta G, Cerrato A, Salvatore D, Zhang L, Manzo G, Picone A, Portella G, Santelli G, Vecchio G and Fusco A. Development of thyroid papillary carcinomas secondary to tissue-specific expression of the RET/PTC1 oncogene in transgenic mice. Oncogene 12: 1821-1826, 1996.

  80. Klugbauer S, Lengfelder E, Demidchik EP and Rabes HM. High prevalence of RET rearrangement in thyroid tumors of children from Belarus after the Chernobyl reactor accident. Oncoogene 11: 2459-2467, 1995.

  81. Nishisho I, Rowland JM, Bove KE, Monforte-Munoz H and Fagin JA. Distinct pattern of ret oncogene rearrangements in morphological variants of radiation-induced and sporadic thyroid papillary carcinoma in children. Cancer Res 57: 1690-1694, 1997.

  82. Klugbauer S, Lengfelder E, Demidchik EP and Rabes HM. A new form of RET rearrangement in thyroid carcinomas of children after the Chernobyl reactor acident. Oncogene 13: 1099-1102, 1996.

  83. Fugazzola L, Pierotti MA, Vigano E, Pacini F, Vorontsova TV and Bongarzone I. Molecular and biochemical analysis of RET/PTC4, a novel oncogenic rearrangement between RET and ELE1 genes, in a post-Cherynobyl papillary thyroid cancer. Oncogene 13: 1093-1097, 1996.

  84. Klugbauer S, Demidchik EP, Lengfelder E and Rabes HM. Detection of a novel type of RET rearrangement (PTC5) in thyroid carcinomas after Chernobyl and analysis of the involved RET-fused gene RFG5. Cancer Res 58: 198-203, 1998.

  85. Williams GH, Rooney S, Thomas GA, Cummins G and Williams ED. RET activation in adult and childhood papillary thyroid carcinoma using a reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction approach on archival-nested material. Br J Cancer 74: 585-589, 1996.

  86. Jhiang SM, Caruso DR, Gilmore E, Ishizaka Y, Tahira T, Nagao M, Chiu IM and Mazzaferri EL. Detection of the PTC/retTPC oncogene in human thyroid cancers. Oncogene 7: 1331-1337, 1992.

  87. Sugg SL, Zheng L, Rosen IB, Freeman JL, Ezzat S and Asa SL. ret/PTC-1,-2 and -3 oncogene rearrangements in human thyroid carcinomas: Implications for metastatic potential? J Clin Endocrinol Metab 81: 3360-3365, 1996.

  88. Mayr B, Brabant G, Goretzki P, Ruschoff J, Dietmaier W and Dralle H. ret/Ptc-1, -2, and -3 oncogene rearrangements in human thyroid carcinomas: implications for metastatic potential? [letter; comment]. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 82: 1306-1307, 1997.

  89. Viglietto G, Chiappetta G, Martinez-Tello FJ, Fukunaga FH, Tallini G, Rigopoulou D, Visconti R, Mastro A, Santoro M and Fusco A. RET/PTC oncogene activation is an early event in thyroid carcinogenesis. Oncogene 11: 1207-1210, 1995.

  90. Cheung CC, Carydis B, Ezzat S, Bedard YC and Asa SL. Analysis of ret/PTC gene rearrangements refines the fine needle aspiration diagnosis of thyroid cancer. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 86: 2187-2190, 2001.

  91. Thompson NW, Dunn EL, Batsakis JG and Nishiyama RH. Hürthle cell lesions of the thyroid gland. Surg Gynecol Obstet 139: 555-560, 1974.

  92. Grant CS, Barr D, Goellner JR and Hay ID. Benign Hürthle cell tumors of the thyroid: A diagnosis to be trusted? World J Surg 12: 488-495, 1988.

  93. Cheung CC, Ezzat S, Ramyar L, Freeman JL and Asa SL. Molecular basis of Hurthle cell papillary thyroid carcinoma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 85: 878-882, 2000.

  94. Chiappetta G, Toti P, Cetta F, Giuliano A, Pentimalli F, Amendola I, Lazzi S, Monaco M, Mazzuchelli L, Tosi P, Santoro M and Fusco A. The RET/PTC oncogene is frequently activated in oncocytic thyroid tumors (Hurthle cell adenomas and carcinomas), but not in oncocytic hyperplastic lesions. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 87: 364-369, 2002.

  95. Belchetz G, Cheung CC, Freeman J, Rosen IB, Witterick IJ and Asa SL. Hurthle cell tumors: using molecular techniques to define a novel classification system. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 128: 237-240, 2002.

  96. Asa SL. My approach to oncocytic tumours of the thyroid. J Clin Pathol 57: 225-232, 2004.

  97. Volante M, Bozzalla-Cassione F, DePompa R, Saggiorato E, Bartolazzi A, Orlandi F and Papotti M. Galectin-3 and HBME-1 expression in oncocytic cell tumors of the thyroid. Virchows Arch 445: 183-188, 2004.

  98. Cohen Y, Xing M, Mambo E, Guo Z, Wu G, Trink B, Beller U, Westra WH, Ladenson PW and Sidransky D. BRAF mutation in papillary thyroid carcinoma. J Natl Cancer Inst 95: 625-627, 2003.

  99. Fukushima T, Suzuki S, Mashiko M, Ohtake T, Endo Y, Takebayashi Y, Sekikawa K, Hagiwara K and Takenoshita S. BRAF mutations in papillary carcinomas of the thyroid. Oncogene 22: 6455-6457, 2003.

  100. Kimura ET, Nikiforova MN, Zhu Z, Knauf JA, Nikiforov YE and Fagin JA. High prevalence of BRAF mutations in thyroid cancer: genetic evidence for constitutive activation of the RET/PTC-RAS-BRAF signaling pathway in papillary thyroid carcinoma. Cancer Res 63: 1454-1457, 2003.

  101. Namba H, Nakashima M, Hayashi T, Hayashida N, Maeda S, Rogounovitch TI, Ohtsuru A, Saenko VA, Kanematsu T and Yamashita S. Clinical implication of hot spot BRAF mutation, V599E, in papillary thyroid cancers. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 88: 4393-4397, 2003.

  102. Nikiforova MN, Kimura ET, Gandhi M, Biddinger PW, Knauf JA, Basolo F, Zhu Z, Giannini R, Salvatore G, Fusco A, Santoro M, Fagin JA and Nikiforov YE. BRAF mutations in thyroid tumors are restricted to papillary carcinomas and anaplastic or poorly differentiated carcinomas arising from papillary carcinomas. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 88: 5399-5404, 2003.

  103. Soares P, Trovisco V, Rocha AS, Lima J, Castro P, Preto A, Maximo V, Botelho T, Seruca R and Sobrinho-Simoes M. BRAF mutations and RET/PTC rearrangements are alternative events in the etiopathogenesis of PTC. Oncogene 22: 4578-4580, 2003.

  104. Xu X, Quiros RM, Gattuso P, Ain KB and Prinz RA. High prevalence of BRAF gene mutation in papillary thyroid carcinomas and thyroid tumor cell lines. Cancer Res 63: 4561-4567, 2003.

  105. Trovisco V, Vieira DC, I, Soares P, Maximo V, Silva P, Magalhaes J, Abrosimov A, Guiu XM and Sobrinho-Simoes M. BRAF mutations are associated with some histological types of papillary thyroid carcinoma. J Pathol 202: 247-251, 2004.

  106. Xing M, Vasko V, Tallini G, Larin A, Wu G, Udelsman R, Ringel MD, Ladenson PW and Sidransky D. BRAF T1796A transversion mutation in various thyroid neoplasms. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 89: 1365-1368, 2004.

  107. Umbricht CB, Saji M, Westra WH, Udelsman R, Zeiger MA and Sukumar S. Telomerase activity: a marker to distinguish follicular thyroid adenoma from carcinoma. Cancer Res 57: 2144-2147, 1997.

  108. Haugen BR, Nawaz S, Markham N, Hashizumi T, Shroyer AL, Werness B and Shroyer KR. Telomerase activity in benign and malignant thyroid tumors. Thyroid 7: 337-342, 1997.

  109. Khoo ML, Ezzat S, Freeman JL and Asa SL. Cyclin D1 protein expression predicts metastatic behavior in thyroid papillary microcarcinomas but is not associated with gene amplification. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 87: 1810-1813, 2002.

  110. Khoo ML, Beasley NJ, Ezzat S, Freeman JL and Asa SL. Overexpression of cyclin D1 and underexpression of p27 predict lymph node metastases in papillary thyroid carcinoma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 87: 1814-1818, 2002.

  111. Khoo ML, Freeman JL, Witterick IJ, Irish JC, Rotstein LE, Gullane PJ and Asa SL. Underexpression of p27/Kip in thyroid papillary microcarcinomas with gross metastatic disease. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 128: 253-257, 2002.

  112. Mitselou A, Peschos D, Dallas P, Charalabopoulos K, Agnantis NJ and Vougiouklakis T. Immunohistochemical analysis of expression of bcl-2 protein in papillary carcinomas and papillary microcarcinomas of the thyroid gland. Exp Oncol 26: 282-286, 2004.

  113. Kroll TG, Sarraf P, Pecciarini L, Chen CJ, Mueller E, Spiegelman BM and Fletcher JA. PAX8-PPARgamma1 fusion oncogene in human thyroid carcinoma. Science 289: 1357-1360, 2000.

  114. Nikiforova MN, Biddinger PW, Caudill CM, Kroll TG and Nikiforov YE. PAX8-PPARgamma rearrangement in thyroid tumors: RT-PCR and immunohistochemical analyses. Am J Surg Pathol 26: 1016-1023, 2002.

  115. Lacroix L, Mian C, Barrier T, Talbot M, Caillou B, Schlumberger M and Bidart JM. PAX8 and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma 1 gene expression status in benign and malignant thyroid tissues. Eur J Endocrinol 151: 367-374, 2004.

  116. Gustafson KS, LiVolsi VA, Furth EE, Pasha TL, Putt ME and Baloch ZW. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma expression in follicular-patterned thyroid lesions. Caveats for the use of immunohistochemical studies. Am J Clin Pathol 120: 175-181, 2003.

  117. Sahin M, Allard BL, Yates M, Powell JG, Wang XL, Hay ID, Zhao Y, Goellner JR, Sebo TJ, Grebe SK, Eberhardt NL and McIver B. PPAR(gamma) staining as a surrogate for PAX8/PPAR(gamma) fusion oncogene expression in follicular neoplasms: clinico-pathologic correlation and histopathological diagnostic value. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2004.

  118. Mineo R, Costantino A, Frasca F, Sciacca L, Russo S, Vigneri R and Belfiore A. Activation of the hepatocyte growth factor (HGF)-Met system in papillary thyroid cancer: biological effects of HGF in thyroid cancer cells depend on Met expression levels. Endocrinology 145: 4355-4365, 2004.

  119. Weber KB, Shroyer KR, Heinz DE, Nawaz S, Said MS and Haugen BR. The use of a combination of galectin-3 and thyroid peroxidase for the diagnosis and prognosis of thyroid cancer. Am J Clin Pathol 122: 524-531, 2004.

  120. Prasad ML, Pellegata NS, Kloos RT, Barbacioru C, Huang Y and de la CA. CITED1 protein expression suggests Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma in high throughput tissue microarray-based study. Thyroid 14: 169-175, 2004.

  121. Casey MB, Zhang S, Jin L, Kajita S and Lloyd RV. Expression of cyclooxygenase-2 and thromboxane synthase in non-neoplastic and neoplastic thyroid lesions. Endocr Pathol 15: 107-116, 2004.

  122. Nasir A, Catalano E, Calafati S, Cantor A, Kaiser HE and Coppola D. Role of p53, CD44V6 and CD57 in differentiating between benign and malignant follicular neoplasms of the thyroid. In Vivo 18: 189-195, 2004.

  123. Chen Z, Mustafa T, Trojanowicz B, Brauckhoff M, Gimm O, Schmutzler C, Kohrle J, Holzhausen HJ, Kehlen A, Klonisch T, Finke R, Dralle H and Hoang-Vu C. CD82, and CD63 in thyroid cancer. Int J Mol Med 14: 517-527, 2004.

  124. Czyz W, Balcerczak E, Jakubiak M, Pasieka Z, Kuzdak K and Mirowski M. HMGI(Y) gene expression as a potential marker of thyroid follicular carcinoma. Langenbecks Arch Surg 389: 193-197, 2004.

  125. Wreesmann VB, Sieczka EM, Socci ND, Hezel M, Belbin TJ, Childs G, Patel SG, Patel KN, Tallini G, Prystowsky M, Shaha AR, Kraus D, Shah JP, Rao PH, Ghossein R and Singh B. Genome-wide profiling of papillary thyroid cancer identifies MUC1 as an independent prognostic marker. Cancer Res 64: 3780-3789, 2004.

  126. Torres-Cabala C, Panizo-Santos A, Krutzsch HC, Barazi H, Namba M, Sakaguchi M, Roberts DD and Merino MJ. Differential expression of S100C in thyroid lesions. Int J Surg Pathol 12: 107-115, 2004.

  127. Cheung CC, Ezzat S, Freeman JL, Rosen IB and Asa SL. Immunohistochemical diagnosis of papillary thyroid carcinoma. Mod Pathol 14: 338-342, 2001.

  128. Prasad ML, Pellegata NS, Huang Y, Nagaraja HN, Chapelle AA and Kloos RT. Galectin-3, fibronectin-1, CITED-1, HBME1 and cytokeratin-19 immunohistochemistry is useful for the differential diagnosis of thyroid tumors. Mod Pathol 2004.

  129. Huang Y, Prasad M, Lemon WJ, Hampel H, Wright FA, Kornacker K, LiVolsi V, Frankel W, Kloos RT, Eng C, Pellegata NS and de la CA. Gene expression in papillary thyroid carcinoma reveals highly consistent profiles. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98: 15044-15049, 2001.