—  SHORT COURSE #48  —

Surgical Pathology and Current Molecular Aspects of Dysplasia in the GI Tract

Section 4 - Molecular Basis of Squamous Dysplasia and Carcinoma of the Esophagus

Robert D. Odze, M.D.
Jonathan Glickman, M.D., Ph.D.
Mark Redston, M.D.


The molecular basis of squamous cell carcinoma and associated preneoplastic precursors are summarized in Table 2.

Molecular Diagnostic Applications in Squamous Dysplasia
The only molecular alteration that has been significantly studied in premalignant squamous lesions of the esophagus is p53 [74]. This gene is mutated in a high proportion of squamous cell carcinomas, particularly in regions of high endemic risk [74]. In such cases, p53 immunohistochemical staining reveals nuclear positivity (consistent with mutation) in dysplasia, and in focal areas of non-dysplastic squamous epithelium [75]. Limited molecular analyses have identified p53 mutations in some of these foci. These findings support the observations of other studies [76, 77, 78]. Although abnormalities in p53 expression have been prospectively identified in non-dysplastic biopsies from individuals at risk for squamous esophageal carcinoma [79], additional studies are required to characterize the utility of p53 as a biomarker for progression in squamous neopalsia of the esophagus.

There is some preliminary evidence in the possible utility of several other markers. Expression of p63 and deltaNp63 isoforms has been detected at very high levels in most squamous low and high grade intraepithelial neoplasms [80].

Molecular Basis of Dysplasia and Adenocarcinoma of the Stomach
Although there are a significant number of studies regarding molecular alterations in gastric cancer, studies investigating the progression from premalignant precursors are more limited (reviewed in [81, 82, 83, 84, 85]) . The findings are presented in Table 3.

Molecular Diagnostic Applications in Gastric Premalignant Neoplasia

Progression Markers in Gastric Intestinal Metaplasia
The number of studies that have investigated genetic alterations in non-dysplastic gastric mucosa with intestinal metaplasia are quite limited. Shiao et al found p53 mutations in 6/12 (50%) non-dysplastic caases with intestinal metaplasia adjacent to carcinoma [86]. Accumulation of p53 in intestinal metaplasia has also been demonstrated by immunohistochemical methods, and was most common in Type III metaplasia [87]. Microsatellite instability has been found in cases with intestinal metaplasia both with and without cancer. Leung et al found high frequency microsatellite instability in 7/75 samples with intestinal metaplasia [88]. These results are further supported by the finding of MLH1 promoter methylation in intestinal metaplasia [89]. In addition, promoter methylation can be identified at a number of other loci in intestinal metaplasia, including p16 [89]. Finally, COX-2 expression has been identified in intestinal metaplasia, raising the possibility that COX-2 inhibitors agents may be effective in chemoprevention [90].

Progression Markers in Gastric Adenomas and Dysplasia
In a recent investigation, Lee et al found that APC gene mutations were more common in adenomas or flat dysplasia without associated adenocarcinoma (59/78) complared to adenomas/dysplasia with adenocarcinoma (1/30) or adenocarcinomas without adenoma/dysplasia (3/69; P < 0.001)[91]. In contrast, high frequency microsatellite instability was more frequent in adenomas/dysplasia with associated adenocarcinoma (6/35) than in adenomas/dysplasia without associated carcinoma (2/75; P = 0.01). These findings were interpreted as suggesting that adenomas without APC mutations, or with high frequency microsatellite instability, may have a different biologic behavior, and may be more likely to progress to cancer.

Familial Diffuse Gastric Carcinoma
In addition to an increased risk of gastric cancer in families with hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer, gastric cancer can also be inherited in an autosomal dominant-like manner. In this setting, the cancers are usually of the diffuse type, and are associated with germ line inherited inactivating mutations in E-cadherin [92, 93]. Prophylatic gastrectomy specimens from individuals known to carry germ line E-cadherin mutations have revealed focal mucosal signet ring cell collections consistent with early carcinoma [94, 95].

Molecular Aspects of Fundic Gland Polyps
Fundic gland polyps are a well recognized feature of familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP), which is caused by germ line mutations in the APC gene [96]. In the setting of FAP, most fundic gland polyps show inactivation of the second copy of the APC gene by somatic mutation [97]. There is no correlation between the presence of somatic mutations and dysplasia, which commonly occurs in FAP-associated lesions. Fundic gland polyps also occur sporadically. In this setting, APC mutations are uncommon [97]. However, beta-catenin mutations are found in the majority [98, 99], resulting in nuclear beta-catenin stabilization (similar to the effect of APC mutation). Although dysplasia is uncommon in sporadic fundic gland polyps, those that develop dysplasia are much more likely to have APC mutations, suggesting a link between APC mutations and the development of dysplasia in fundic gland polyps [100].
Table 1. Molecular alterations in Barrett's esophagus

Molecular Alteration Biologic Role
Non-dysplastic Barrett's
SRC overexpression tyrosine kinase in EGF signalling pathway
11q13 amplification/Cyclin D1 overexpression stimulates cell cycle progression
Bcl2 overexpression inhibits apoptosis
13q14 deletion/Rb inactivation de-regulation of cell cycle progression and apoptosis
9p21 deletion/p16 inactivation CDK inhibitor; de-regulation of cell cycle progression
5q21 deletion/APC inactivation WNT signalling; cell adhesion
18q deletion/DCC (and other) gene loss some genes involved in TGFB signalling
17p13 deletion/p53 inactivation DNA damage response; de-regulation of cell cycle arrest and apoptosis
Aneuploidy end result of chromosomal instability
Dysplastia
KRAS activating mutations signal transduction; growth stimulation
p21 overexpression CDK inhibitor; may reflect underlying p53 abnormalities
telomerase overexpression maintains chromosomes; important for cell immortality
p27 loss or cytoplasmic localization CDK inhibitor; de-regulation of cell cycle
Adenocarcinoma
17q21 amplification/HER2 overexpression transmembrane receptor; external growth signals
7p12-13 amplification/EGFR overexpression transmembrane receptor; external growth signals
2p13 amplification/TGF-α overexpression ligand for EGFR; stimulates cell division
MDM2 overexpression negative regulation of p53
19q12 amplification/Cyclin E overexpression stimulates cell cycle progression
E and P cadherin loss increased cell migration; metastasis
Other chromosomal deletions (including 3p, 4p, 4q, 7q, 12q, 17q, 22q) and amplifications (including 2p, 8q, 20q) unknown tumor suppressor genes and oncogenes

Table 2. Molecular alterations in squamous neoplasia of the esophagus
Molecular Alteration Biologic Role
Non-dysplastic squamous epithelium
p53 immunoreactivity DNA damage response; de-regulation of cell cycle arrest and apoptosis
Squamous Dysplasia
17p13 LOH/p53 mutation DNA damage response; de-regulation of cell cycle arrest and apoptosis
Squamous Cell Carcinoma
11q13 amplification/Cyclin D1 overexpression stimulates cell cycle progression
7p12-13 amplification/EGFR overexpression transmembrane receptor; external growth signals
8q24.1 amplification/c-myc overexpression transcriptional activation
9p21 deletion/p16 inactivation CDK inhibitor; de-regulation of cell cycle progression
13q14 deletion/Rb inactivation de-regulation of cell cycle progression and apoptosis
Other chromosomal deletions (including 1p, 3p, 5q, 11q, and 18q) unknown tumor suppressor genes and oncogenes
References
  1. Beilstein, M. and D. Silberg, Cellular and molecular mechanisms responsible for progression of Barrett's metaplasia to esophageal carcinoma. Gastroenterol Clin North Am, 2002. 31(2): p. 461-79, ix.

  2. Jenkins, G.J., et al., Genetic pathways involved in the progression of Barrett's metaplasia to adenocarcinoma. Br J Surg, 2002. 89(7): p. 824-37.

  3. Souza, R.F., C.P. Morales, and S.J. Spechler, Review article: a conceptual approach to understanding the molecular mechanisms of cancer development in Barrett's oesophagus. Aliment Pharmacol Ther, 2001. 15(8): p. 1087-100.

  4. Krishnadath, K.K., B.J. Reid, and K.K. Wang, Biomarkers in Barrett esophagus. Mayo Clin Proc, 2001. 76(4): p. 438-46.

  5. Wijnhoven, B.P., H.W. Tilanus, and W.N. Dinjens, Molecular biology of Barrett's adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg, 2001. 233(3): p. 322-37.

  6. Jankowski, J.A., et al., Molecular evolution of the metaplasia-dysplasia-adenocarcinoma sequence in the esophagus. Am J Pathol, 1999. 154(4): p. 965-73.

  7. Tselepis, C., I. Perry, and J. Jankowski, Barrett's esophagus: disregulation of cell cycling and intercellular adhesion in the metaplasia-dysplasia-carcinoma sequence. Digestion, 2000. 61(1): p. 1-5.

  8. Reid, B.J., et al., Barrett's esophagus. Correlation between flow cytometry and histology in detection of patients at risk for adenocarcinoma. Gastroenterology, 1987. 93(1): p. 1-11.

  9. Prevo, L.J., et al., p53-mutant clones and field effects in Barrett's esophagus. Cancer Res, 1999. 59(19): p. 4784-7.

  10. Galipeau, P.C., et al., Clonal expansion and loss of heterozygosity at chromosomes 9p and 17p in premalignant esophageal (Barrett's) tissue. J Natl Cancer Inst, 1999. 91(24): p. 2087-95.

  11. Barrett, M.T., et al., Evolution of neoplastic cell lineages in Barrett oesophagus. Nat Genet, 1999. 22(1): p. 106-9.

  12. Casson, A.G., Role of molecular biology in the follow-up of patients who have Barrett's esophagus. Chest Surg Clin N Am, 2002. 12(1): p. 93-111, ix-x.

  13. Reid, B.J., P.L. Blount, and P.S. Rabinovitch, Biomarkers in Barrett's esophagus. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am, 2003. 13(2): p. 369-97.

  14. Fitzgerald, R.C. and M.J. Farthing, The pathogenesis of Barrett's esophagus. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am, 2003. 13(2): p. 233-55.

  15. Teodori, L., et al., DNA/protein flow cytometry as a predictive marker of malignancy in dysplasia-free Barrett's esophagus: thirteen-year follow-up study on a cohort of patients. Cytometry, 1998. 34(6): p. 257-63.

  16. Reid, B.J., et al., Predictors of progression to cancer in Barrett's esophagus: baseline histology and flow cytometry identify low- and high-risk patient subsets. Am J Gastroenterol, 2000. 95(7): p. 1669-76.

  17. Rabinovitch, P.S., et al., Predictors of progression in Barrett's esophagus III: baseline flow cytometric variables. Am J Gastroenterol, 2001. 96(11): p. 3071-83.

  18. Reid, B.J., et al., Flow-cytometric and histological progression to malignancy in Barrett's esophagus: prospective endoscopic surveillance of a cohort. Gastroenterology, 1992. 102(4 Pt 1): p. 1212-9.

  19. Galipeau, P.C., et al., 17p (p53) allelic losses, 4N (G2/tetraploid) populations, and progression to aneuploidy in Barrett's esophagus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 1996. 93(14): p. 7081-4.

  20. Carlson, N., et al., Acid suppression therapy may not alter malignant progression in Barrett's metaplasia showing p53 protein accumulation. Am J Gastroenterol, 2002. 97(6): p. 1340-5.

  21. Vousden, K.H. and X. Lu, Live or let die: the cell's response to p53. Nat Rev Cancer, 2002. 2(8): p. 594-604.

  22. Hammoud, Z.T., et al., Allelotype analysis of esophageal adenocarcinomas: evidence for the involvement of sequences on the long arm of chromosome 4. Cancer Res, 1996. 56(19): p. 4499-502.

  23. Barrett, M.T., et al., Determination of the frequency of loss of heterozygosity in esophageal adenocarcinoma by cell sorting, whole genome amplification and microsatellite polymorphisms. Oncogene, 1996. 12(9): p. 1873-8.

  24. Dolan, K., et al., Allelotype analysis of oesophageal adenocarcinoma: loss of heterozygosity occurs at multiple sites. Br J Cancer, 1998. 78(7): p. 950-7.

  25. Hamelin, R., et al., TP53 gene mutations and p53 protein immunoreactivity in malignant and premalignant Barrett's esophagus. Gastroenterology, 1994. 107(4): p. 1012-8.

  26. Blount, P.L., et al., 17p allelic deletions and p53 protein overexpression in Barrett's adenocarcinoma. Cancer Res, 1991. 51(20): p. 5482-6.

  27. Doak, S.H., et al., Characterisation of p53 status at the gene, chromosomal and protein levels in oesophageal adenocarcinoma. Br J Cancer, 2003. 89(9): p. 1729-35.

  28. Gleeson, C.M., et al., Base transitions at CpG dinucleotides in the p53 gene are common in esophageal adenocarcinoma. Cancer Res, 1995. 55(15): p. 3406-11.

  29. Blount, P.L., et al., 17p allelic losses in diploid cells of patients with Barrett's esophagus who develop aneuploidy. Cancer Res, 1994. 54(9): p. 2292-5.

  30. Suspiro, A., et al., Losses of heterozygosity on chromosomes 9p and 17p are frequent events in Barrett's metaplasia not associated with dysplasia or adenocarcinoma. Am J Gastroenterol, 2003. 98(4): p. 728-34.

  31. Casson, A.G., et al., Clinical implications of p53 gene mutation in the progression of Barrett's epithelium to invasive esophageal cancer. Am J Surg, 1994. 167(1): p. 52-7.

  32. Blount, P.L., et al., Clonal ordering of 17p and 5q allelic losses in Barrett dysplasia and adenocarcinoma. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 1993. 90(8): p. 3221-5.

  33. Reid, B.J., et al., Predictors of progression in Barrett's esophagus II: baseline 17p (p53) loss of heterozygosity identifies a patient subset at increased risk for neoplastic progression. Am J Gastroenterol, 2001. 96(10): p. 2839-48.

  34. Dolan, K., et al., TP53 mutations in malignant and premalignant Barrett's esophagus. Dis Esophagus, 2003. 16(2): p. 83-9.

  35. Skacel, M., et al., p53 expression in low grade dysplasia in Barrett's esophagus: correlation with interobserver agreement and disease progression. Am J Gastroenterol, 2002. 97(10): p. 2508-13.

  36. Bani-Hani, K., et al., Prospective study of cyclin D1 overexpression in Barrett's esophagus: association with increased risk of adenocarcinoma. J Natl Cancer Inst, 2000. 92(16): p. 1316-21.

  37. Younes, M., et al., p53 Protein accumulation is a specific marker of malignant potential in Barrett's metaplasia. Dig Dis Sci, 1997. 42(4): p. 697-701.

  38. Weston, A.P., et al., p53 protein overexpression in low grade dysplasia (LGD) in Barrett's esophagus: immunohistochemical marker predictive of progression. Am J Gastroenterol, 2001. 96(5): p. 1355-62.

  39. Jenkins, G.J., et al., Early p53 mutations in nondysplastic Barrett's tissue detected by the restriction site mutation (RSM) methodology. Br J Cancer, 2003. 88(8): p. 1271-6.

  40. Paulson, T.G., P.C. Galipeau, and B.J. Reid, Loss of heterozygosity analysis using whole genome amplification, cell sorting, and fluorescence-based PCR. Genome Res, 1999. 9(5): p. 482-91.

  41. Bian, Y.S., et al., p16 inactivation by methylation of the CDKN2A promoter occurs early during neoplastic progression in Barrett's esophagus. Gastroenterology, 2002. 122(4): p. 1113-21.

  42. Barrett, M.T., et al., Allelic loss of 9p21 and mutation of the CDKN2/p16 gene develop as early lesions during neoplastic progression in Barrett's esophagus. Oncogene, 1996. 13(9): p. 1867-73.

  43. Klump, B., et al., Hypermethylation of the CDKN2/p16 promoter during neoplastic progression in Barrett's esophagus. Gastroenterology, 1998. 115(6): p. 1381-6.

  44. Wong, D.J., et al., p16INK4a promoter is hypermethylated at a high frequency in esophageal adenocarcinomas. Cancer Res, 1997. 57(13): p. 2619-22.

  45. Wong, D.J., et al., p16(INK4a) lesions are common, early abnormalities that undergo clonal expansion in Barrett's metaplastic epithelium. Cancer Res, 2001. 61(22): p. 8284-9.

  46. Arber, N., et al., Increased expression of the cyclin D1 gene in Barrett's esophagus. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev, 1996. 5(6): p. 457-9.

  47. Eads, C.A., et al., Fields of aberrant CpG island hypermethylation in Barrett's esophagus and associated adenocarcinoma. Cancer Res, 2000. 60(18): p. 5021-6.

  48. Robaszkiewicz, M., et al., [Flow cytometric analysis of cellular DNA content in Barret's esophagus. A study of 66 cases]. Gastroenterol Clin Biol, 1991. 15(10): p. 703-10.

  49. Chu, P.G., Z. Jiang, and L.M. Weiss, Hepatocyte antigen as a marker of intestinal metaplasia. Am J Surg Pathol, 2003. 27(7): p. 952-9.

  50. Mandys, V., K. Lukas, and R. Revoltella, Different patterns of cytokeratin expression in Barrett's esophagus--what is beyond? Pathol Res Pract, 2003. 199(9): p. 581-7.

  51. Mohammed, I.A., C.J. Streutker, and R.H. Riddell, Utilization of cytokeratins 7 and 20 does not differentiate between Barrett's esophagus and gastric cardiac intestinal metaplasia. Mod Pathol, 2002. 15(6): p. 611-6.

  52. Phillips, R.W., H.F. Frierson, Jr., and C.A. Moskaluk, Cdx2 as a marker of epithelial intestinal differentiation in the esophagus. Am J Surg Pathol, 2003. 27(11): p. 1442-7.

  53. van der Woude, C.J., et al., Expression of apoptosis-related proteins in Barrett's metaplasia-dysplasia-carcinoma sequence: a switch to a more resistant phenotype. Hum Pathol, 2002. 33(7): p. 686-92.

  54. Warson, C., et al., Barrett's esophagus is characterized by expression of gastric-type mucins (MUC5AC, MUC6) and TFF peptides (TFF1 and TFF2), but the risk of carcinoma development may be indicated by the intestinal-type mucin, MUC2. Hum Pathol, 2002. 33(6): p. 660-8.

  55. Barrett, M.T., et al., Molecular phenotype of spontaneously arising 4N (G2-tetraploid) intermediates of neoplastic progression in Barrett's esophagus. Cancer Res, 2003. 63(14): p. 4211-7.

  56. Brabender, J., et al., Differential SPARC mRNA expression in Barrett's oesophagus. Br J Cancer, 2003. 89(8): p. 1508-12.

  57. Brabender, J., et al., Glutathione S-transferase-pi expression is downregulated in patients with Barrett's esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma. J Gastrointest Surg, 2002. 6(3): p. 359-67.

  58. Cobbe, S.C., et al., Alteration of glutathione S-transferase levels in Barrett's metaplasia compared to normal oesophageal epithelium. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2003. 15(1): p. 41-7.

  59. Going, J.J., et al., Aberrant expression of minichromosome maintenance proteins 2 and 5, and Ki-67 in dysplastic squamous oesophageal epithelium and Barrett's mucosa. Gut, 2002. 50(3): p. 373-7.

  60. Bodger, K., F. Campbell, and J.M. Rhodes, Detection of sulfated glycoproteins in intestinal metaplasia: a comparison of traditional mucin staining with immunohistochemistry for the sulfo-Lewis(a) carbohydrate epitope. J Clin Pathol, 2003. 56(9): p. 703-8.

  61. Brandlein, S., et al., Cysteine-rich fibroblast growth factor receptor 1, a new marker for precancerous epithelial lesions defined by the human monoclonal antibody PAM-1. Cancer Res, 2003. 63(9): p. 2052-61.

  62. Croft, J., et al., Analysis of the premalignant stages of Barrett's oesophagus through to adenocarcinoma by comparative genomic hybridization. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2002. 14(11): p. 1179-86.

  63. Doak, S.H., et al., Chromosome 4 hyperploidy represents an early genetic aberration in premalignant Barrett's oesophagus. Gut, 2003. 52(5): p. 623-8.

  64. Sanz-Ortega, J., et al., 3p21, 5q21, 9p21 and 17p13.1 allelic deletions are potential markers of individuals with a high risk of developing adenocarcinoma in Barrett's epithelium without dysplasia. Hepatogastroenterology, 2003. 50(50): p. 404-7.

  65. Miyazono, F., et al., Mutations in the mitochondrial DNA D-Loop region occur frequently in adenocarcinoma in Barrett's esophagus. Oncogene, 2002. 21(23): p. 3780-3.

  66. Ortner, M.A., et al., Time gated fluorescence spectroscopy in Barrett's oesophagus. Gut, 2003. 52(1): p. 28-33.

  67. Georgakoudi, I., et al., NAD(P)H and collagen as in vivo quantitative fluorescent biomarkers of epithelial precancerous changes. Cancer Res, 2002. 62(3): p. 682-7.

  68. Kendall, C., et al., Raman spectroscopy, a potential tool for the objective identification and classification of neoplasia in Barrett's oesophagus. J Pathol, 2003. 200(5): p. 602-9.

  69. Rudolph, R.E., et al., Serum selenium levels in relation to markers of neoplastic progression among persons with Barrett's esophagus. J Natl Cancer Inst, 2003. 95(10): p. 750-7.

  70. Vaughan, T.L., et al., Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use, body mass index, and anthropometry in relation to genetic and flow cytometric abnormalities in Barrett's esophagus. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev, 2002. 11(8): p. 745-52.

  71. Xiao, H., et al., Acidic pH induces topoisomerase II-mediated DNA damage. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2003. 100(9): p. 5205-10.

  72. Olliver, J.R., et al., Chromoendoscopy with methylene blue and associated DNA damage in Barrett's oesophagus. Lancet, 2003. 362(9381): p. 373-4.

  73. Kaur, B.S., et al., Rofecoxib inhibits cyclooxygenase 2 expression and activity and reduces cell proliferation in Barrett's esophagus. Gastroenterology, 2002. 123(1): p. 60-7.

  74. Mandard, A.M., P. Hainaut, and M. Hollstein, Genetic steps in the development of squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. Mutat Res, 2000. 462(2-3): p. 335-42.

  75. Mandard, A.M., et al., Expression of p53 in oesophageal squamous epithelium from surgical specimens resected for squamous cell carcinoma of the oesophagus, with special reference to uninvolved mucosa. J Pathol, 1997. 181(2): p. 153-7.

  76. Bennett, W.P., et al., p53 mutation and protein accumulation during multistage human esophageal carcinogenesis. Cancer Res, 1992. 52(21): p. 6092-7.

  77. Bennett, W.P., et al., Archival analysis of p53 genetic and protein alterations in Chinese esophageal cancer. Oncogene, 1991. 6(10): p. 1779-84.

  78. Shi, S.T., et al., Role of p53 gene mutations in human esophageal carcinogenesis: results from immunohistochemical and mutation analyses of carcinomas and nearby non-cancerous lesions. Carcinogenesis, 1999. 20(4): p. 591-7.

  79. Fagundes, R.B., et al., p53 protein in esophageal mucosa of individuals at high risk of squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. Dis Esophagus, 2001. 14(3-4): p. 185-90.

  80. Geddert, H., et al., The role of p63 and deltaNp63 (p40) protein expression and gene amplification in esophageal carcinogenesis. Hum Pathol, 2003. 34(9): p. 850-6.

  81. Leung, W.K. and J.J. Sung, Review article: intestinal metaplasia and gastric carcinogenesis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther, 2002. 16(7): p. 1209-16.

  82. Werner, M., et al., Gastric adenocarcinoma: pathomorphology and molecular pathology. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol, 2001. 127(4): p. 207-16.

  83. El-Rifai, W. and S.M. Powell, Molecular biology of gastric cancer. Semin Radiat Oncol, 2002. 12(2): p. 128-40.

  84. Fiocca, R., et al., Molecular mechanisms involved in the pathogenesis of gastric carcinoma: interactions between genetic alterations, cellular phenotype and cancer histotype. Hepatogastroenterology, 2001. 48(42): p. 1523-30.

  85. Ebert, M.P. and P. Malfertheiner, Review article: Pathogenesis of sporadic and familial gastric cancer--implications for clinical management and cancer prevention. Aliment Pharmacol Ther, 2002. 16(6): p. 1059-66.

  86. Shiao, Y.H., et al., p53 alteration in gastric precancerous lesions. Am J Pathol, 1994. 144(3): p. 511-7.

  87. Wu, M.S., et al., Overexpression of p53 in different subtypes of intestinal metaplasia and gastric cancer. Br J Cancer, 1998. 78(7): p. 971-3.

  88. Leung, W.K., et al., Microsatellite instability in gastric intestinal metaplasia in patients with and without gastric cancer. Am J Pathol, 2000. 156(2): p. 537-43.

  89. Kang, G.H., et al., CpG island methylation in premalignant stages of gastric carcinoma. Cancer Res, 2001. 61(7): p. 2847-51.

  90. Sung, J.J., et al., Cyclooxygenase-2 expression in Helicobacter pylori-associated premalignant and malignant gastric lesions. Am J Pathol, 2000. 157(3): p. 729-35.

  91. Lee, J.H., et al., Inverse relationship between APC gene mutation in gastric adenomas and development of adenocarcinoma. Am J Pathol, 2002. 161(2): p. 611-8.

  92. Guilford, P., et al., E-cadherin germline mutations in familial gastric cancer. Nature, 1998. 392(6674): p. 402-5.

  93. Guilford, P.J., et al., E-cadherin germline mutations define an inherited cancer syndrome dominated by diffuse gastric cancer. Hum Mutat, 1999. 14(3): p. 249-55.

  94. Huntsman, D.G., et al., Early gastric cancer in young, asymptomatic carriers of germ-line E-cadherin mutations. N Engl J Med, 2001. 344(25): p. 1904-9.

  95. Chun, Y.S., et al., Germline E-cadherin gene mutations: is prophylactic total gastrectomy indicated? Cancer, 2001. 92(1): p. 181-7.

  96. Fodde, R. and R. Smits, Disease model: familial adenomatous polyposis. Trends Mol Med, 2001. 7(8): p. 369-73.

  97. Abraham, S.C., et al., Fundic gland polyps in familial adenomatous polyposis: neoplasms with frequent somatic adenomatous polyposis coli gene alterations. Am J Pathol, 2000. 157(3): p. 747-54.

  98. Abraham, S.C., et al., Sporadic fundic gland polyps: common gastric polyps arising through activating mutations in the beta-catenin gene. Am J Pathol, 2001. 158(3): p. 1005-10.

  99. Sekine, S., et al., Beta-catenin mutations in sporadic fundic gland polyps. Virchows Arch, 2002. 440(4): p. 381-6.

  100. Abraham, S.C., et al., Sporadic fundic gland polyps with epithelial dysplasia : evidence for preferential targeting for mutations in the adenomatous polyposis coli gene. Am J Pathol, 2002. 161(5) p. 1735-42.