POSTER SESSION IV
Tuesday, March 23, 2010   —  1:00 PM - 4:30 PM
Exhibit Hall


Click on the blue numbers in parentheses to display abstracts.
Click the button next to any title to add to Itinerary Planner...




BREAST PATHOLOGY



Poster#Title and AuthorsItinerary
Planner
1 100% Concordance between IHC and FISH HER2 Testing Cannot Be Achieved Using N9831 Cohort (267)
AE McCullough, B Chen, DW Hillman, KS Tenner, RB Jenkins, MM Reinholz, WL Lingle, AC Dueck, EA Perez - Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale AZ, Rochester MN, Jacksonville FL
Add
2 HER2 Testing: How To Get High Concordance Rate between Immunohistochemistry and Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (240)
T Khoury, Y Zakharia, H Hwang, W Liu, S Edge, D Tan, C Morrison - Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo; Unity Hospital, Rochester; MD-Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
Add
3 Uroplasminogen Receptor IHC Study in Triple Negative Breast Carcinoma (282)
GM Oprea-Ilies, SE Pambuccian, R Gamez, A Young, C Cohen - Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Univeristy of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
Add
4 The Concordance of Estrogen and Progesterone Receptor Status, and Her-2/Neu Expression in DCIS Coexistent with Micro-Invasive and Invasive Carcinoma (134)
Q Ahmed, R Ali-Fehmi, W Sakr, Z Nahleh, Y Hussein, M Ibrahim, B Albashiti, K Hayek, I Khalifeh, S Bandyopadhyay - Wayne State University, Detroit, MI; Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI; American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
Add
5 ER and PR Discordances: Comparison of IHC by Local and Central Laboratory and RT-PCR by Central Laboratory in ECOG Breast Cancer Study 2197 (149)
FL Baehner, R Gray, B Childs, T Maddala, S Rowley, N Davidson, S Shak, LJ Goldstein, GW Sledge, JA Sparano, S Badve - University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group, Indianapolis, IA; Sanofi Aventis, Bridgewater, NJ; GHI, Redwood City, CA
Add
6 HER2 Diagnosis Program in Argentina with a Standardized and Reproducible Technique: Variation in Positive Rates throughout the Years (195)
I Frahm, G Acosta Haab, S Sarancone, Grupo Her2, V Caceres - Sanatorio Mater Dei and Hospital Maria Curie, Buenos Aires, Argentina; Labotatorio Quantum, Rosario, Santa Fe, Argentina; Programa Nacional de Diagnostico de HER2, Argentina; Productos Roche, Tigre, Buenos Aires, Argentina
Add
7 Automated Bright-Field Dual Color, Dual Hapten HER2 In Situ Hybridization Assay: An Alternative Method for Evaluation of HER2 Gene Amplification in Breast Cancer (324)
LJ Tafe, J Teruya-Feldstein, A McElhinny, J Ranger-Moore, J Emch, C Schemp, V Barbashina - Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, NY; Ventana Medical Systems, Inc., Tucson, AZ
Add
8 Oligonucleotide Array Analysis of the HER2 Amplicon in Breast Cancers (263)
I Lytvak, SR Gunn, I Yeh - University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX
Add
9 Comparative Assessment of Immunohistochemistry, Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization, and Silver-Enhanced In Situ Hybridization for Evaluation of HER2 Gene Status in Breast Carcinoma (302)
Y Ryu, H Jeong, Y Kim, B Kim, H Kim, A Kim - Korea University Guro Hospital, Seoul, Korea
Add
10 Determining HER-2/Neu Status on Needle Core Biopsies in the Neoadjuvant Setting: Does Florescence In-Situ Hybridization Remain the Gold Standard for 2+ Cases in These Smaller Samples? (179)
T D'Alfonso, Y-F Liu, S Monni, PP Rosen, SJ Shin - Weill Cornell Medical College, NY, NY
Add
11 Immunohistochemistry and In-Situ Hybridization for HER2 on a Single Slide Is Feasible and Allows Direct Comparison at the Individual Cell Level (293)
ES Reisenbichler, A Andea, D Horton, O Hameed - University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL
Add
12 Microarray Based Determination of ER, PR and HER2 Receptor Status Compared to Local IHC/FISH Assessment (308)
G Seitz, J Palacios, JM Guinebretiere, E Lienen, P Roepman, L Stork-Sloots, R Bender, Y Tokunaga, T Watanabe - Institute of Pathology, Bamberg, Germany; Hospitales Universitarios Virgen del Rocio, Sevilla, Spain; Centre Rene Huguenin, Saint-Cloud, France; Agendia BV and Agendia Inc, Huntighton Beach, CA; Hamamatsu Oncology Center, Hamamatsu, Japan
Add
13 Automated FISH Analysis for the HER2 Gene Status Assessment in Breast Cancer: A Validation Study Based on 306 Cases (184)
G DeMaglio, G Falconieri, S Pizzolitto - General University Hospital, Udine, Italy
Add
14 Amplification of the Oncogen HER2 by Immunohistoquemistry and FISH in Patients with Breast Cancer in Colombia. Analysis of 2879 Consecutive Cases Comparing Peripheral Laboratories and a Reference Institution (142)
RE Andrade, A Plata, R Lopez - Hospital Universitario Fundacion Santa Fe de Bogota, Bogota, Colombia
Add
15 Establishment of the Australian In Situ Hybridisation Program for the Assessment of HER2 Amplification in Breast Cancer: A Model for the Introduction of New Biomarkers into Clinical Practice (193)
G Farshid, JE Armes, R Bell, M Cummings, S Fox, G Francis, M Haswell, A Morey, G McCue, W Raymond, P Robbins, M Bilous - SA Pathology, Adelaide, SA, Australia; Mater Health Services, Brisbane, QLD, Australia; Andrew Love Cancer Centre, Geelong, VIC, Australia; Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia; Peter MacCallum Cancer Institute, Melbourne, VA, Australia; Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia; Roche Australia, Sydney, NSW, Australia; St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Woolomin Consulting, Crookwell, NSW, Australia; Flinders Medical Centre, Adelaide, SA, Australia; Queen Elizabeth II Medical Centre, Perth, WA, Australia; Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
Add
16 Dual Color Chromogenic In Situ Hybridisation Seems To Detect a Different Subgroup of HER2/Neu Amplified Immunoscore 2+ Breast Carcinomas Compared to FISH (250)
SF Lax, S Urdl, K Prein - General Hospital Graz West, Graz, Austria
Add
17 Does Her2neu Expression Vary with Fixation Time? (224)
JA Ibarra, LW Rogers - Memorial Care Breast Center at Orange Coast, Fountain Valley, CA; MemorialCare Breast Center at Long Beach, Long Beach, CA
Add
18 Expression of Cyclin D1, MIB-1 (Ki-67) and Estrogen Receptor in Flat Epithelial Atypia (169)
M Chivukula, G Carter, DJ Dabbs - Magee Women's Hospital of UPMC, Pittsburgh, PA
Add
19 Effect of Formalin Fixation Time on Her 2 Expression by Immunohistochemical Technique (186)
SM Dintzis, KH Allison - University of Washington, Seattle, WA
Add
20 Impact of Decalcification on Receptor Status in Breast Cancer (182)
F Darvishian, B Singh, S Krauter, L Chiriboga, J Melamed - NYU-Langone Medical Center, New York, NY
Add
21 Estrogen Receptor and Progesterone Receptor Immunohistochemistry Results in Breast Carcinoma Using Varying Fixation Times in Different Fixatives (260)
AC Lowe, N Moatamed, R Pucci, IP Shintaku, S Shapourifar-Tehrani, B Shackley, SK Apple - UCLA, Los Angeles, CA
Add
22 Delay to Formalin Fixation Effect on Estrogen and Progesterone Receptors in Breast Cancer: A Study of Three Different Clones (287)
J Qiu, S Kulkarni, R Chandrasekhar, M Rees, K Hyde, G Wilding, D Tan, T Khoury - Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY; Leica Microsystems, Bannockburn, IL; Ventana, Tucson, AZ; MD-Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
Add
23 Concordance between Semi-Quantitative Immunohistochemical Evaluation and Oncotype Dx RT-PCR Derived ER, PR and HER-2 Status in Breast Cancer (226)
R Jaffar, R Virk, D Kandil, S Lu, A Khan - U Mass Memorial Medical Center, Worcester, MA
Add
24 The Oncotype DX Assay May Not Be Required for All Estrogen Receptor Positive Breast Cancers (311)
JD Shiffer, B Obadia, S Apple, F Dadmanesh, E Wolin, P McAndrew, S Bose - Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles; Kaiser Permanente, Woodland Hills; UCLA, Los Angeles, CA
Add
25 Can Pathologic Features and Immunophenotype of ER+, Node Negative Breast Cancers Identify High and Low Risk OncotypeDX Subgroups? (138)
KH Allison, SM Dintzis, PL Kandalaft, AM Gown, LC Goldstein - University of Washington, Seattle, WA; PhenoPath Laboratories, Seattle, WA; IMPRIS, Seattle, WA
Add
26 Estrogen Receptor β Isoforms 1, 2 and 5 and Oncotype Recurrence Score (196)
A Fung, A Adams, A Page, D Williams, C Cohen - Emory University Hospital, Atlanta, GA
Add
27 The Relationship between Recurrence Score of 21-Gene Assay and Clinicopathological Factors of Breast Cancer (344)
K Woolf, J Wang, DG Hicks, X Wang, LM Schiffhauer, K Skinner, P Tang - University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY; RTI Health Solutions, Research Triangle Park, NC
Add
28 Estimation of Risk of Recurrence of Early Stage Estrogen Receptor Positive (ER+) Breast Carcinoma by Pathologists Compared to Oncotype Dx Recurrence Score - A Multi-Institutional Study (130)
G Acs, NN Esposito, C Reynolds, TJ Lawton, I Bleiweiss, C Nagi, O Ioffe, O Hameed, D Dabbs, R Bhargava, MR Quddus, CJ Sung, M Gilcreast, A Sapino, G Cserni, J Kulka, J Jacquemier, P Regitnig, I Baas, P van Diest, C Quinn - Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL
Add
29 Recurrence Score of 21-Gene Assay Is Correlated with a Panel of Immunopathological Factors of Breast Cancer (322)
K Subik, A Delaney, J Wang, X Wang, LM Schiffhauer, M Shayne, A Huston, K Skinner, DG Hicks, P Tang - University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY; RTI Health Solutions, Research Triangle Park, NC
Add
30 Comparative Analysis of Breast Prognostic Indicators by Immunohistochemistry and Oncotype DX (180)
F Dadmanesh, B Obadia, S Apple, J Shiffer, P McAndrew, E Wolin, S Bose - Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Kaiser Permanente Medical Center, Woodland Hills, CA
Add
31 Ki-67 Proliferative Index in Estrogen Receptor-Positive/HER2-Neu Negative Early Breast Cancer Predicts Oncotype DX Recurrence Score (238)
C Kelly, RS Saad, S Nofech-Mozes, H Kahn, J Zubovits, J Wong, WM Hanna - Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center/University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
Add