Gynecologic Pathology
Moderators: Robert H.Young and Jaime Prat

Mucinous Cystadenocarcinoma

Jaime Prat
Professor and Chairman of Pathology
Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau
Autonomous University of Barcelona, Spain


Clinical History:
A 43-year old woman was admitted to the hospital because of massive abdominal enlargement and pain. Pelvic ultrasound revealed a large multilocular cystic tumor. CA 12.5: 422 mU/L; CA 19.9: 1260 mU/L. At laparotomy, the right ovary was replaced by a tumor, 38 cm in greatest diameter. The outer surface was grayish-white and smooth with prominent blood vessels, but there was an area of rupture of 9.5 cm in diameter. On section, the tumor was predominantly cystic with a solid component. The cysts, up to 24 cm in diameter contained thick mucinous fluid. The solid tissue was grayish-yellow and exhibited several foci of hemorrhage and necrosis. A total abdominal hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, omentectomy, and appendectomy were done.


Figure 1
Click to view with ImageScope
Click to view with a Web-Based Viewer

Diagnosis:
Mucinous Cystadenocarcinoma

Gross Features:
  • Unilateral ovarian tumor, 38 cm in greatest diameter

  • Predominantly cystic

  • Capsular rupture, 9.5 cm

  • Solid component with focal hemorrhage and necrosis

  • Grayish-white, firm tissue (6.0 cm) attached to proximal appendix


Microscopic Features:
  • Cysts and glands lined by atypical epithelium of intestinal type

  • Benign, borderline, and malignant components

  • Thin and branching papillae (borderline)

  • Stratification of goblet and signet-ring cells with moderate to severe nuclear atypia (intraepithelial carcinoma)

  • Numerous foci (up to 10.2 sq. mm. in area) of infiltrating anaplastic tumor cells
    (Submitted slide)

  • Extensive "dirty" necrosis with "amputated" glands

  • Metastasis to the mesoappendix (Stage III)


Follow-up:
The patient received chemotherapy. One year later she developed peritoneal carcinomatosis. Subsequently, she died with hepatic and pulmonary metastases.

Discussion:
Mucinous tumors are characterized by cysts and glands lined by epithelial cells that contain intracytoplasmic mucin. The tumor cells may resemble those of the endocervix, gastric pylorus, or intestine. Mucinous tumors account for 10-15% of all ovarian tumors. [1] Approximately 75% are benign; 10%, borderline; and 15%, carcinomas. [1] Although they generally occur in older women (mean ages 51-54 years), mucinous borderline tumors and carcinomas are more common in the first two decades than their serous counterparts. [2] Mucinous tumors tend to be the largest of all ovarian tumors. Many of them are 15-30 cm in diameter and weigh up to 4000 g or more. [2]

Mucinous borderline tumors
Mucinous borderline tumors (MBTs) exhibit an epithelial proliferation greater than that seen in their benign counterparts, but without destructive stromal invasion. They are almost as common as serous borderline tumors (SBTs) and constitute 40-50% of all non-benign mucinous tumors and 71% of those that are stage I. [3] MBTs have been subclassified into two different clinicopathologic forms: the most common form is composed of intestinal-type epithelium and has been designated MBT of intestinal type (IMBT). A second and less common variant of MBT contains endocervical-type epithelium and has been named MBT endocervical-like (EMBT). [4, 5, 6, 7]

Mucinous borderline tumors of intestinal type
IMBTs account for approximately 85% of MBTs and occur most frequently in the fourth to seventh decades with an average age of 52 years. [2] From 80-90% of them are stage I and only about 5% are bilateral. [3, 4] It should be noted that metastatic mucinous tumors in the ovary often mimic primary ovarian mucinous neoplasms, particularly adenocarcinomas of the pancreas and large intestine. [8] Microscopically, the metastatic tumor may appear deceptively 'benign,' 'borderline,' or malignant. It has been recently established that most, if not all, ovarian mucinous tumors associated with 'pseudomyxoma peritonei' (PP) are metastatic tumors, frequently from appendiceal mucinous neoplasms. [9] Bilaterality is exceptional in stage I ovarian mucinous tumors; therefore, tumor involvement of both ovaries should rise the suspicion of metastatic carcinoma.

On gross examination, the tumors average 19 cm in diameter, are usually cystic and multilocular, and contain mucinous fluid. [2] Papillae and polypoid excrescences may line the cysts. IMBTs cannot be distinguished grossly from mucinous cystadenomas and cystadenocarcinomas. These tumors should be sampled extensively since variations in the degree of epithelial proliferation and nuclear atypia (from benign to borderline, and to carcinoma) are frequent within an individual neoplasm.

Microscopically, IMBTs are composed of cysts and glands lined by atypical epithelium of gastrointestinal type. The cysts may contain papillae which are typically thin and branching. The lining epithelium almost always contains goblet cells and may have argyrophil cells, and occasional Paneth cells. The epithelial cells are usually stratified to two or three layers, nuclear atypia is mild to moderate, and mitotic figures vary from few to numerous. Stromal invasion is not seen. The overall appearance is similar to that of a hyperplastic or adenomatous colonic polyp.

Noninvasive IMBTs may exhibit areas of epithelial cell proliferation of four or more layers, scattered foci of cribriform or stroma-free papillary architecture, and moderate (grade 2) or severe atypical (grade 3) nuclei. Whether tumors with such areas should be classified as noninvasive carcinomas or as borderline tumors has been a subject of controversy for many years. [3, 10] Recent studies, [11, 12, 13, 14, 15] however, have demonstrated that these tumors are almost always clinically benign and it has been recommended that they be classified as mucinous borderline tumors with intraepithelial carcinoma (BIEC). [2] The latter diagnosis is mainly based on cytologic features. Because of their in situ malignant change, BIECs require more extensive sampling than pure IMBTs to rule out stromal invasion.

Approximately 10% of IMBTs contain one or more foci of stromal microinvasion (arbitrarily defined as not exceeding 10 square mm in area). The presence of these foci does not seem to alter the favorable prognosis of IMBT, on the basis of the few cases reported. [6, 13, 14, 15]

Stage I IMBTs are treated similarly to SBTs. While performing a frozen section, the pathologist should be aware that additional postoperative sampling may disclose a carcinomatous component and the surgeon should be informed that the diagnosis could be changed after examination of the permanent sections. When this is done, the surgeon is more likely to undertake appropriate staging. If there is PP or bilateral ovarian tumors, removal of the appendix as well as exploration of the abdomen for a possible source of metastasis are recommended.

According to the FIGO annual report, [16] MBTs are confined to one or both ovaries (stage I) in 82% of the cases, are stage II in 6%, stage III in 10%, and stage IV in 2%. Almost all stage II-III IMBTs are associated with PP and, as stated earlier, there is convincing evidence that most of these tumors are secondary to mucinous tumors of the appendix. This finding, as well as the near 100% 5-year survival of stage I IMBTs, has raised the question of whether the noninvasive mucinous ovarian tumors have any malignant potential. Some investigators [13] have proposed to abandon the borderline denomination for these tumors and replacing it with 'atypical proliferative mucinous tumors.' Others, [14, 15] however, believe that the term 'borderline' should be retained because it better reflects the view that these tumors represent intermediate stages of mucinous tumorigenesis and may be accompanied by intraepithelial and frankly invasive carcinomas; also, it is possible that some IMBTs may account for the rare cases of PP in which the appendix does not contain a mucinous tumor. [14]

Mucinous carcinomas
The establishment of the borderline subcategory of mucinous tumors as well as the increasing recognition of metastatic adenocarcinomas that resemble primary ovarian mucinous tumors, and the recent interpretation of most ovarian mucinous cystic tumors associated with PP as metastatic tumors from the appendix, have narrowed significantly the number of mucinous ovarian tumors currently diagnosed as carcinoma. Thus, the reported frequency of 15% for mucinous adenocarcinomas primary in the ovary may be overestimated, and most of the recent observations about the behavior of these tumors have been based on a relatively small number of cases.

Mucinous carcinomas are usually large, unilateral, multilocular or unilocular cystic masses containing mucinous fluid. They often exhibit papillary and solid areas which may be soft and mucoid or firm, hemorrhagic, and necrotic. The tumors are bilateral in only 5% of the cases. Bilateral mucinous carcinomas or unilateral carcinomas < 10 cm in greatest dimension should rise the suspicion of metastases.

Over 80% of frankly invasive mucinous carcinomas have components of IMBT or mucinous cystadenoma or both, suggesting a progression from benign to malignant neoplasia. The remaining 20% of the carcinomas appear exclusively malignant. Recently, it has been proposed to divide mucinous carcinomas into two categories: an expansile type without demonstrable destructive stromal invasion, but exhibiting back-to-back or complex malignant glands without or with minimal intervening stroma and exceeding 10 square mm in area ( >3 mm in each of two linear dimensions); and an infiltrative type, characterized by obvious stromal invasion in the form of glands, cell clusters, or individual cells, disorderly infiltrating the stroma and frequently associated with a desmoplastic stromal reaction. [14] The expansile pattern of growth has also been referred in the literature as the 'noninvasive,' 'intraglandular' [12] or 'confluent glandular' [13] pattern.

The most important differential diagnosis of mucinous ovarian carcinoma is with metastatic mucinous carcinoma that may present clinically as a primary ovarian tumor. Most of these originate in the large intestine, appendix, pancreas, biliary tract, stomach, or cervix. [8, 9, 17, 18, 19] Common features that favor a primary mucinous carcinoma are an expansile pattern of invasion and a complex papillary pattern. [19] Common features favoring a metastatic mucinous carcinoma are bilaterality, a multinodular growth pattern microscopically, ovarian surface involvement by epithelial cells (surface implants) and vascular invasion. [19]

Recent studies strongly suggest that in the sequence of malignant transformation from benign and borderline mucinous tumors to infiltrative carcinoma, intraepithelial (non-invasive) carcinomas and carcinomas with purely expansile (not obvious) invasion represent transitional stages of mucinous carcinogenesis. [14, 15] This hypothesis is also supported by recent molecular studies of genetic alterations in mucinous tumors. [20] An increasing frequency of codon 12/13 K-ras mutations in benign, borderline and carcinomatous mucinous ovarian tumors has been reported supporting the viewpoint that K-ras mutational activation is an early event in mucinous ovarian tumorigenesis. [20]

FIGO stage is the single most important prognostic factor, and stage I carcinomas have an excellent prognosis. However, the prognosis in cases with extraovarian spread is very poor. [12, 13, 14, 15] According to the FIGO annual report, [16] mucinous carcinomas are confined to one or both ovaries in 49% of the cases, are stage II in 11%, stage III in 29%, and stage IV in 10%. The 5-year survival for patients with stage I mucinous carcinomas is 83%; stage II, 55%; stage III, 21%; and stage IV, 9%. [16]

Recent studies have clearly demonstrated that FIGO stage is largely related to the histologic features of the ovarian tumors. Infiltrative stromal invasion proved to be biologically more aggressive than expansile invasion. In fact, in two recent series totaling 59 cases of invasive carcinoma, [14, 15] all 20 cases of carcinoma with expansile invasion and follow-up information were stage I and none of the patients had recurrent disease. Of the 25 infiltrative carcinomas with follow-up data, only 9 of 13 patients with stage I disease and one of 12 with higher-stage disease (stage IIA) had a favorable outcome. Furthermore, in contrast to previous reports, [12, 14] one of the two series [15] showed that high nuclear grade (grade 3) was predictive of behavior independent of the surgical stage.

The combination of extensive and infiltrative stromal invasion, high nuclear grade, and tumor rupture should be considered a strong predictor of recurrence for stage I mucinous carcinomas. [15]

Foci of stromal invasion <10 square mm have been designated 'microinvasive,' and cases with this finding have had a favorable outcome. [6, 14, 15] However, experience with these tumors is still scarce, and occasional carcinomas with stromal invasion barely beyond the limit accepted for microinvasion have produced metastases. [21]

Immunohistochemistry
Although selected immunostains can be very helpful in distinguishing primary from secondary ovarian tumors, immunohistochemistry is considerably less useful when the ovarian neoplasm is of mucinous type. Most ovarian mucinous borderline tumors and carcinomas are of intestinal type and, therefore, their immunophenotype frequently overlaps with that of metastatic gastrointestinal tumors. Cytokeratin (CK) immunostains are the most commonly used. [22] Primary ovarian mucinous tumors are almost always (up to 80%) immunoreactive for CK7 whereas colorectal adenocarcinomas are usually CK7 negative. [23, 24] However, CK7 is usually positive in metastatic carcinomas of the pancreas, notorious for masquerading as primary ovarian tumors, and it is also focally expressed by many other carcinomas, including those of stomach, gallbladder, small bowel, appendix, lung, breast, thyroid, uterus, and bladder. [17, 25, 26] Ovarian mucinous borderline tumors and carcinomas are immunoreactive for CK20 in 65% and 75% of cases respectively, but the reaction is typically weak and focal. [17] In contrast, colorectal adenocarcinomas are diffusely and strongly reactive for CK20. [17, 24, 25] Therefore, a CK7-negative/CK20-positive immunoprofile suggests metastatic adenocarcinoma. [17, 22] Although the vast majority of colorectal adenocarcinomas express CK20, poorly differentiated and right-sided tumors can be CK20 negative. [24]Thus, immunostains for CK7 and CK20 should be interpreted with caution, always in the light of all clinical information, and with the understanding that no tumor shows absolute consistency in its staining with these markers.

Other immunohistochemical stains have greater overlap in their expressions and should not be used individually in this differential diagnosis. Nevertheless, after taking into account the clinicopathologic findings and the results of the CK immunostains, negative stainings for vimentin, CA125, B72.3, and gastric mucin gene MUC5AC [27, 28] and strongly positive staining for carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and MUC2 [27, 28] favor metastatic colorectal cancer over primary ovarian adenocarcinoma. Loss of Dpc4 immunoreactivity occurs in almost 50% of metastatic carcinomas of the pancreas, whereas most primary ovarian mucinous carcinomas are focally or diffusely positive. [17]

HPV DNA assessment may be helpful for distinguishing mucinous adenocarcinoma of the cervix metastatic to the ovary from a primary ovarian mucinous carcinoma. Recently, expression of p16 has been found to be a reliable surrogate marker for HPV. [29]

References
  1. Koonings PP, Campbel K, Mishell DR Jr, Grimes DA. Relative frequency of primary ovarian neoplasms: a ten year review. Obstet Gynecol 74:921-926, 1989.

  2. Scully RE, Young RH, Clement PB. Tumors of the ovary, maldeveloped gonads, Fallopian tube, and broad ligament. Atlas of Tumor Pathology. Third Series. Fascicle 23. AFIP, Washington D.C. 1998; 81-105.

  3. Hart WR. Ovarian epithelial tumors of borderline malignancy (carcinomas of low malignant potential). Hum Pathol 1977; 8:541-549.

  4. Rutgers JL, Scully RE. Ovarian müllerian mucinous papillary cystadenomas of borderline malignancy. A clinicopathologic analysis. Cancer 1988; 61:340-348.

  5. Shappell HW, Riopel MA, Smith Sehdev AE, et al. Diagnostic criteria and behavior of ovarian seromucinous (endocervical-type mucinous and mixed cell-type) tumors. Atypical proliferative (borderline) tumors, intraepithelial, microinvasive, and invasive carcinomas. Am J Surg Pathol 2002; 26:1529-1541.

  6. Khunamornpong S, Russell P, Dalrymple JC. Proliferating (LMP), mucinous tumors of the ovaries with microinvasion: morphologic assessment of 13 cases. Int J Gynecol Pathol 1999;18:238-246.

  7. Rodríguez IM, Irving JA, Prat J. Endocervical-like mucinous tumors of the ovary. A clinicopathologic analysis of 31 cases. Am J Surg Pathol 2004;25:1311-1318.

  8. Young RH, Hart WR. Metastases from carcinomas of the pancreas simulating primary mucinous tumors of the ovary: a report of seven cases. Am J Surg Pathol 1989; 13:748-756.

  9. Young RH, Gilks CB, Scully RE. Mucinous tumors of the appendix associated with mucinous tumors of the ovary and pseudomyxoma peritonei: a clinicopathological analysis of 22 cases supporting an origin in the appendix. Am J Surg Pathol 1991;15:415-429.

  10. Hart WR, Norris HJ. Borderline and malignant mucinous tumors of the ovary. Histologic criteria and clinical behavior. Cancer 1973; 31: 1031-1045.

  11. De Nictolis M, Montironi R, Tommasoni S, et al. Benign, borderline and well-differentiated malignant intestinal mucinous tumors of the ovary: a clinicopathologic, histochemical, immunohistochemical and nuclear quantitative study of 57 cases. Int J Gynecol Pathol 1994; 13:10 -21.

  12. Hoerl HD, Hart WR. Primary ovarian mucinous cystadenocarcinomas. A clinicopathologic study of 49 cases with long term follow-up. Am J Surg Pathol 1998; 22: 1449-1462.

  13. Riopel MA, Ronnett BM, Kurman RJ. Evaluation of diagnostic criteria and behavior of ovarian intestinal-type mucinous tumors: atypical proliferative (borderline), tumors, and intraepithelial, microinvasive, invasive and metastatic carcinomas. Am J Surg Pathol 1999; 23: 617-635.

  14. Lee K, Scully RE. Mucinous tumors of the ovary. A clinicopathologic study of 196 borderline tumors (of intestinal type) and carcinomas, including an evaluation of 11 cases with 'pseudomyxoma peritonei.' Am J Surg Pathol 2000; 24:1447-1464.

  15. Rodríguez IM, Prat J. Mucinous tumors of the ovary. A clinicopathologic analysis of 75 borderline tumors (of intestinal type) and carcinomas. Am J Surg Pathol 2002; 26: 139-152.

  16. Pettersson F. Annual report of the results of treatment in gynecological cancer. Stockholm , International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 1991.

  17. Ji H, Isacson C, Seidman J, et al. Cytokeratins 7 and 20, Dpc4, and MUC5AC in the distinction of metastatic mucinous carcinomas in the ovary from primary ovarian mucinous tumors: Dpc4 assists in identifying metastatic pancreatic carcinomas. Int J Gynecol Pathol 2002; 21:391-400.

  18. Park SY, Kim HS, Hong EK, Kim WH. Expression of cytokeratins 7 and 20 in primary carcinomas of the stomach and colorectum and their value in the differential diagnosis of metastatic carcinomas to the ovary. Hum Pathol 2002; 33:1078-1085.

  19. Lee KR, Young RH. The distinction between primary and metastatic mucinous carcinomas of the ovary: gross and histologic findings in 50 cases. Am J Surg Pathol 2003; 27:281-292.

  20. Cuatrecasas M, Villanueva A, Matias-Guiu X, Prat J. K-ras mutations in mucinous ovarian tumors. A clinicopathologic and molecular study of 95 cases. Cancer 1997; 79: 1581-1586.

  21. Nomura K, Aizawa S. Noninvasive, microinvasive, and invasive mucinous carcinomas of the ovary. A clinicopathologic analysis of 40 cases. Cancer 2000; 89:1541-1546.

  22. Wauters CC, Smedts F, Gerrits LGM, et.al. Keratins 7 and 20 as diagnostic markers of carcinomas metastatic to the ovary. Human Pathol 1995;26:852-855.

  23. Miettinen M. Keratin 20: immunohistochemical marker for gastrointestinal, urothelial, and Merkel cell carcinomas. Mod Pathol 1995;8:384-388.

  24. Park SY, Kim HS, Hong EK, Kim WH. Expression of cytokeratins 7 and 20 in primary carcinomas of the stomach and colorectum and their value in the differential diagnosis of metastatic carcinomas to the ovary. Hum Pathol 2002;33:1078-1085.

  25. Lee MJ, Lee HS, Kim WH, et al. Expression of mucins and cytokeratins in primary carcinomas of the digestive system. Mod Pathol 2003;16:403-410.

  26. Soslow RA, Rouse RV, Hendrickson MR, et al. Transitional cell neoplasms of the ovary and urinary bladder: A comparative immunohistochemical analysis. Int J Gynecol Pathol 1996; 15:257-265.

  27. Albarracin CT, Jafri J, Montag AG, et al. Differential expression of MUC2 and MUC5AC mucin genes in primary ovarian and metastatic colonic carcinoma. Hum Pathol 2000; 31:672-677.

  28. Lau SK, Weiss LM, Chu PG. Differential expression of MUC1, MUC2 and MUC5AC in carcinomas of various sites: An immunohistochemical study. Am J Clin Pathol 2004;122:61-69.

  29. Elishaev E, Gilks CB, Miller D, et al. Synchronous and metachronous endocervical and ovarian neoplasms: evidence supporting interpretation of the ovarian neoplasms as metastatic endocervical adenocarcinomas simulating primary ovarian surface epithelial neoplasms. Am J Surg Pathol 2005;29:281-294.