


|

Value of Immunohistochemistry in Gynecological Pathology
Moderator: Dr. W. Glenn McCluggage
|
Case 10 -
|
Leiomyosarcoma

Michael T. Deavers, M.D.
The University of Texas
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
Houston, Texas
|


Case History
The patient is a 70-year old woman who presented to her primary care physician with
shortness of breath and a cough. The patient's past medical history was significant for a TAH-BSO 15
years prior for uterine "fibroids". A chest X-ray and a subsequent CT of the chest demonstrated multiple
pulmonary and pleural nodules. Later she was noted to have left hip and leg pain. An MRI revealed a
lytic lesion that had destroyed part of the femur. She underwent resection of the distal femur (slide
provided) and reconstruction with an endoprosthesis. The tumor involving the femur was positive for ER
and WT-1; PR was negative.

 Case 10 - Figure 1
|

The tumor involved the distal diaphysis and metaphysis, and extended through the cortex into adjacent
soft tissue. The intramedullary component measured 21 x 4 x 4 cm, while the soft tissue component was 12
x 7 x 5 cm. Histologically, it was composed of intersecting fascicles of spindle cells with eosinophilic
cytoplasm. The nuclei were elongated and oval with mild to moderate atypia; there were 3 mitoses per 10
high power fields. Focal coagulative tumor cell necrosis was present. The tumor infiltrated medullary
boney trabeculae, but did not produce matrix itself. In addition to ER and WT-1, it was diffusely
positive for SMA and desmin. A diagnosis of leiomyosarcoma was made.

Leiomyosarcoma involving bone, whether primary or secondary, is unusual. Approximately 120 cases of
primary leiomyosarcoma of the bone have been reported. The patients are generally middle-aged or older,
men and women are equally affected, and the long bones of the extremities are most frequently involved.
However, before a leiomyosarcoma can be accepted as arising from the bone, metastatic disease must be
ruled out. In these cases, the uterus is one of the most common primary sites, with metastases occurring
up to 19 years after hysterectomy, and it is recommended that all previous pathology be carefully
re-reviewed.

Unfortunately, the slides and blocks from the hysterectomy specimen in this case had been discarded,
which illustrates the problems sometimes encountered with extrauterine smooth muscle tumors. The
histologic features of uterine and extrauterine smooth muscle tumors are the same, and often the
patient's gynecologic history is vague or unknown. Immunohistochemistry may offer some guidance in these
cases.

The majority of uterine smooth muscle tumors express hormone receptors. While virtually all
leiomyomas are positive for ER and PR, 36-87% of leiomyosarcomas are positive for ER and 43-80% are
positive for PR. This is in distinction to extrauterine smooth muscle tumors. Although some
extrauterine leiomyomas are ER and PR positive, only 0-25% and 0-13% of extrauterine leiomyosarcomas
express ER and PR, respectively. Additionally, while uterine leiomyosarcomas often have a diffuse
distribution of receptors, ER and PR are usually only focal in the extrauterine tumors.

In addition to their potential utility in helping to distinguish uterine from extrauterine
leiomyosarcomas, ER and PR have also been investigated in regard to the diagnosis and prognosis of
uterine smooth muscle tumors. Three studies have suggested that leiomyosarcomas, as a group, have
decreased expression of hormone receptors as compared to benign smooth muscle tumors and STUMP. However,
given the relatively limited experience and the overlap in staining between the groups, great caution
should be exercised in individual cases. No significant correlation has been found between ER and PR
expression and recurrence or survival.

WT-1, the Wilms tumor gene involved in the development of the genitourinary system, has been noted
recently to be present in uterine cellular leiomyomas. At M.D. Anderson, we undertook a study examining
WT-1 expression in a wide range of mullerian and non-mullerian smooth muscle tumors. All of the
gynecologic leiomyomas and STUMPs, and 60% of the leiomyosarcomas (including 5 of 7 metastases) were
positive for WT-1. However, none of the non-gynecologic smooth muscle tumors (including 22
leiomyosarcomas) were positive.

When faced with an extrauterine smooth muscle tumor of uncertain primary, the patient's history and a
review of prior specimens are helpful for resolving questions of the tumor's origin. However, when this
is not available, immunohistochemical staining for ER, PR, and WT-1 may be of assistance.

References
- Agoff SN, Grieco VS, Garcia, Gown AM. Immunohistochemical distinction of endometrial stromal sarcoma
and cellular leiomyoma. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol 2001; 9:164-169.

- Bodner K, Bodner-Adler B, Kimberger O, Czerwenka K, Leodolter S, Mayerhofer K. Estrogen and
progesterone receptor expression in patients with uterine leiomyosarcoma and correlation with different
clinicopathological parameters. Anticancer Res 2003; 23:729-732.

- Bodner K, Bodner-Adler B, Kimberger O, Czerwenka K, Mayerhofer K. Estrogen and progesterone receptor
expression in patients with uterine smooth muscle tumors. Fertil Steril
2004; 81:1062-1066.

- Deavers MT, Silva EG, Euscher ED, Liu J, Broaddus RB, Malpica A. WT1 expression may differentiate
mullerian from non-mullerian smooth muscle tumors. Mod Pathol 2006; 19,
Supplement 1:176A.

- Fornasier VL, Paley D. Leiomyosarcoma in bone: Primary or secondary? A case report and review of
the literature. Skeletal Radiol 1983; 10:147-153.

- Kelly TW, Borden EC, Goldblum JR. Estrogen and progesterone receptor expression in uterine and
extrauterine leiomyosarcomas: an immunohistochemical study. Appl Immunohistochem
Mol Morphol 2004; 12:338-341.

- Paal E, Miettinen M. Retroperitoneal leiomyomas: a clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical study
of 56 cases with a comparison to retroperitoneal leiomyosarcomas. Am J Surg Pathol
2001; 25:1355-1363.

- Rao UN, Finkelstein SD, Jones MW. Comparative immunohistochemical and molecular analysis of uterine
and extrauterine leiomyosarcomas. Mod Pathol 1999; 12:1001-1009.

- Watanabe K, Suzuki T. Uterine leiomyoma versus leiomyosarcoma: a new attempt at differential
diagnosis based on their cellular characteristics. Histopathology 2006;
48:563-568.

- Zhai YL, Kobayashi Y, Mori A, et al. Expression of steroid receptors, Ki-67, and p53 in uterine
leiomyosarcomas. Int J Gynecol Pathol 1999: 18:20-28.
|


|
|
|