


|

Non-Gynecologic Genitourinary Cytopathology
Moderator: Dr. Warick Delprado
|
Section 3 -
|
Urine Cytology – Beyond Morphology

Eva M. Wojcik
Loyola University Medical Center
Chicago
|


Urinary bladder cancer is the second most common malignancy of the genitor-urinary
tract. According to the American Cancer Society there will be over 60,000 new cases diagnosed in 2006
and over 13,000 people will die in the United States of this disease. The majorities of newly diagnosed
urothelial carcinomas (UC) are low grade and low stage and usually treated by local resection. However,
approximately 70% of them recur and approximately 10% progress to higher stage of higher grade.
Therefore, UC is a challenging condition for both urologists and pathologists. For the urologist, the
challenge is to predict at an early stage which patient will have further tumor occurrences or will
develop invasive properties. For the pathologist, the challenge is mainly to detect low grade lesions.
By definition, the nuclear differences between low grade urothelial carcinoma and normal urothelium are
subtle and very subjective. Additionally, reactive processes due to treatment, lithiasis of the urinary
tract or viral infections may be difficult to distinguish from neoplastic
processes.

A sensitive non-invasive test to detect bladder cancer remains an elusive but
desirable goal. Although urine cytology is highly sensitive for detection of high grade UC, its
sensitivity for low grade cancer remains unacceptably low. Consequently, invasive cystoscopy remains the
mainstays for the diagnosis of bladder urothelial carcinoma and it is used to monitor patients with high
risk for recurrence and progression.

Therefore there is an obvious need for a development of additional more sensitive tests that could
detect urothelial neoplasia. In this context, a number of techniques, including DNA ploidy,
morphometry, immunohistochemistry, cytogenetics, urine chemical assays and lately, molecular
techniques have been proposed to be used either in conjunction with cytologic examination or even to
completely replaced cytology.
DNA Ploidy by Flow Cytometry, Static Image Analysis and Laser Scanning Cytometry
Evaluation of DNA ploidy either by flow cytometry, static image analysis or laser scanning cytometry
has been one of the first adjuvant tests in urine cytology. These techniques measure a total amount of
DNA and are only able to detect a significant and numerous chromosomal changes. This test has been used
for both diagnostic and prognostic purposes. However, an abnormal DNA ploidy is not automatically
associated with malignancy since low grade urothelial carcinomas are diploid and only high grade tumors
are aneuploid. As a result, aneuploidy is a strong indicator of high grade malignancy as well
as carcinoma in situ. Also aneuploidy in conjunction with suspicious cytology is highly predictive of
tumor recurrence. In addition, it has been shown that DNA ploidy analysis provides
independent prognostic information. In addition, there are numerous operator-dependent and independent
factors that affect the results. It has been shown that the superficial cells, seminal vesicle cells and
cells infected with Polyoma virus are causes of false positive results and these cells should be
eliminated from any analyses evaluating DNA ploidy.
DNA Ploidy by Fluorescence in Situ Hybridisation
The understanding of the genetic changes that are associated with bladder cancer initiation and
progression has increased tremendously in the last twenty years. There are two separate genetic pathways
leading to the development of UC. The most common one is associated with a loss of part or all of
chromosome 9 and it leads to noninvasive, papillary tumors that often recur and rarely progress.
However, if this pathway converts to the other much less common one, the disease will progress to a high
grade often invasive tumor. This progression is associated with an increased chromosomal instability and
aneuploidy. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) has been demonstrated as a viable method for
determination of chromosome specific anomalies in cells obtained from urine specimens for early tumor
detection or recurrence. Recently, a multi-color FISH Probe Mixture designed for interphase cell
analysis for detection and quantification of chromosome 3, 7, 17 and the 9p21 region has been made
commercially available (UroVysion ä Multi-color FISH Probe Mixture, Vysis/Abot, Des Plains , IL ). In the
initial study performed by Sokolova et al. (J Mol Diagn 2000;2:116), a number of potential probes was
studied. The four probes with the greatest sensitivity for UC detection were selected. These include
three Centromeric Enumeration Probes (CEPs) for chromosome 3 (red), 7 (green) and 17 (aqua), and one
Locus-Specific Identifier (LSI) probe for 9p21 (yellow). A minimum of 25 morphologically abnormal cells
is evaluated. The test is positive if > 4 cells show gains of > 2 chromosomes. In
addition, loss of 9p21 signals in > 12 cells is also considered positive. In the last few
years, since the FDA approval, the UroVision has gained a significant popularity and has been used by
numerous laboratories. Also, by now there is an impressive body of literature validating this test.
FISH outperformed cytology across all stages and grades of UC in all published comparative studies.
Significantly, depends what chromosomal changes are present, we can predict either recurrence (deletion
of 9p21) or progression (aneuploidy).
Morphometry
Morphometry has been defined as the "quantitative description of a structure". In practice, this
term is usually applied to quantitative techniques that measure features of size, shape, and texture in
two dimensions and/or spatial relationships from cells or other tissue structures. The need for
measurement comes from the recognition that interobserver and intraobserver diagnostic decisions are
poorly reproducible. Morphometry has several advantages over conventional visual assessment:
objectivity, reproducibility and the ability to detect changes too subtle to be visually appreciated in
individual cells. Therefore morphologic diagnostic accuracy and precision can be improved by applying
this technique. A practical application of morphometry has been utilized by a group from the Netherlands
which developed a quantitative karyometric cytology system – QUANTICYT that is based on evaluation of DNA
content and nuclear shape features. The reported sensitivity of this system ranges between 59% - 69% and
specificity between 72% to 93%.
Biomarkers (FDA- Approved)
BTA (Polymedco, Redmont , WA ) – Bladder tumor
antigen detects the presence of basement membrane antigens that have been isolated and characterized in
the urine of bladder cancer patients. The original BTA test that is no longer commercially available is
a qualitative latex agglutination assay. This test has been replaced by a qualitative, point-of-care
test BTA Stat and a quantitative BTA Trak assay that detects human complement factor H-related protein.
The overall sensitivity ranges from 50% to 80% and specificity from 50% to 75%.

NMP 22 (Matritech, Newton , MA ) - is an enzyme immunoassay for the
quantification of nuclear matrix proteins that comprise the internal structural framework of the nucleus.
The antibodies in this assay recognize two domains of the nuclear mitotic apparatus protein. There are
two tests – laboratory-based quantitative assay and point-of-care qualitative test. There are wide
ranges of reported sensitivities (68% - 88%) and specificities (34% - 76%).

UCyt/ImmunoCyt (Diagnocure, Quebec City, Canada) is based on three
monoclonal antibodies (19A211 antigen {HMW CEA, Texas red} and the M344 and LDQ10 {cytoplasmic mucin
antigens expressed in low-grade bladder cancer cell, fluorescein}). The test is performed on voided
urine. Results are verified with morphology. The sensitivity and specificity are reported to be 77% and
84%, respectively.

Accu-Dx (Intracel Corp., Rockville , MD ) detects fibrinogen-fibrin
degradation products in urine. Its sensitivity and specificity are 68% and 86%, respectively. This test
is currently not commercially available.
Other Markers
Telomerase – Telomers are the terminal ends of eukaryotic chromosomes and
their length decreases at each cell cycle. The gradual loss of telomers causes chromosomal instability
that leads to cell senescence. Telomerase is a protein/RNA complex that prevents this process and make
cell immortal. Cancer cells have a high level of telomerase. Telomerase activity is measured using a
telomeric repeat amplification protocol (TRAP). This method requires a minimum 30 ml of urine. The
reported sensitivity ranges from 56 to 90% and specificity ranges from 70 to 96%.

HA-HAase – This test measures urinary hyaluronic acid and hyaluronidase by
two similar ELISA-type assays. Combining the two tests into the HA-HAase test resulted in the detection
of bladder cancer with overall 91% sensitivity and 93% specificity.

Proteomics - The main proteomic technology platform, two-dimensional gel
electrophoresis, is used to separate complex protein mixtures allowing individual protein spots on the
gel to be identified by mass spectrometry. If two related samples are compared, for example urine from a
normal healthy patient and urine from a patient with bladder cancer, differences in the abundances of
particular proteins may be evident. Using this method five potential novel biomarkers and seven protein
clusters have been identified. The reported sensitivity and specificity are 87% and 66%, respectively.

EGF-R - is a member of the TKI (thyrosine kinase receptor) family and is
over-expressed in 81% of primary bladder cancers and in 67% of metastases. Expression is correlated with
stage, grade and survival.

HER2/neu - its over-expression is reported in the muscle-invasive
urothelial carcinoma of the bladder. HER2/neu is a member of the tyrosine kinase family and encodes a
185-kDa transmembrane protein.

IL-8 - is a leukocyte chemo-attractant and induces angiogenesis. Sources
of IL-8 include urothelial cells, endothelial cells, mast cells, neutrophils, T cells and macrophages.
IL-8 levels are greater in patients with UC compared with those with successfully treated UC. Level
increases with higher stage indicating that it is greater in more invasive tumors and it is reduced
after treatment with Bacille Calmette Guerin or mitomycin.

IL-4 – it induces the activation and differentiation of B cells; inhibits
macrophage activation and may be involved in cancer formation; IL-4 gene intron-3 polymorphism is
associated with UC.

E-cadherin - Abnormal expression of E-cadherin has been associated with
more rapid progression and reduced survival. The soluble form (E-cadherin, 80kDa) is elevated in UC
(among other tumors) and is found in both serum and urine. It is up-regulated in papillary tumors and itsexpression gradually lost in high grade,
invasive carcinomas.

Uroplakin II is a membrane protein which is expressed in transitional cell
carcinoma and associated with differentiation/grade and seems to be useful for detection of
micro-metastases.

Survivin - a unique member of the inhibitor of apoptosis (IAP) protein
family. Survivin is highly expressed in urine but is undetectable in non-malignant tissues, suggesting a
potential role in tumor genesis.

References:
- Badelment RA, Kimmel M, Gay H, et al: The sensitivity of flow cytometry compared with conventional cytology in the detection of superficial bladder carcinoma. Cancer 59: 2078-2085; 1987.

- Melamed MR: Flow cytometry for detection and evaluation of urinary bladder carcinoma. Semin Surg Oncol 8: 300-307; 1992.

- Murphy WM, Emerson LD, Chandler RW, et al: Flow cytometry versus urinary cytology in the evaluation of patients with bladder cancer. J Urol 136: 815-819; 1986.

- Koss LG, Eppich EM, Melder KH, Wersto R: DNA cytophotometry of voided urine sediment . Anal Quant Cytol Histol 5: 398-403; 1987.

- Wojcik EM, Bassler TJ, Orozco R: DNA ploidy of seminal vesicle cells. A potential diagnostic pitfall in urine cytology. Analyt Quant Cytol Histol 21: 29-34, 1999

- Wojcik EM, Brownlie RJ, Bassler TJ, Miller MC: Superficial urothelial cells (umbrella cells) - a potential cause of abnormal DNA ploidy results in urine specimens. Analyt Quant Cytol Histol 2000; 22:411-415

- Wojcik EM, Bridges VJ, Miller MC, O'Dowd GJ: The influence of season on the incidence of DNA hypodiploidy in urinary cytology. Cytometry (Comm Clin Cytom) 42: 218-220, 2000

- Hendricks JB, Wojcik EM: Quantitative cytology and histology by Laser Scanning Cytometry. Clin Immunol Newsletter 18: 21-26, 1998.

- Wojcik EM, Saraga S, Jin JK, Hendricks JB: Application of Laser Scanning Cytometry for the evaluation of DNA ploidy in routine cytologic specimens. Diagn Cytopathol in press.

- Wojcik EM, Miller MC, O'Dowd GJ, Veltri RW: The value of quantitative nuclear grading in differentiation of normal urothelial cells from low and high grade transitional cell carcinomas. Analyt Quant Cytol Histol. 20: 69-76, 1998

- Wojcik EM: Diagnostic and prognostic application of computer-based morphometry in transitional cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder. UroOncol 2000; 1: 43-50.

- Skacel M, Fahmy M, Brainard JA, et al.: Multitarget fluorescence in situ hybridization assay detects transitional cell carcinoma in the majority of patients with bladder cancer and atypical or negative urine cytology. J Urol 2003 169(6), 2101-2105.

- Liou LS: Urothelial cancer biomarkers for detection and surveillance. Urol 2006; 67:25-34

- Grossman HB, Messing E, Soloway M, et al.: Detection of bladder cancer using a point-of-care proteomic assay. JAMA 2005;293:810-815

- Lokeshwar VB, Obek C, Pham HT, et al.: Urinary hyaluronic acid and hyaluronidase: markers for bladder cancer detection and evaluation of grade. J Urol 2000; 163:348-356

- Halling KC, King W, Sokolova IA, et al.: A comparison of BTA stat, hemoglobin dipstick, telomerase and Vysis UroVision assays for detection of urothelial carcinoma in urine. J Urol 2002;167:2001-2006
|


|
|
|