—  SYMPOSIUM #41  —

Gestational Trophoblastic Disease
Moderator: Dr. le-Ming Shih

Section 3 - Intermediate Trophoblastic Tumors and Tumor-like Lesions- the Clinico-pathologic Aspects

Lars-Christian Horn
Institute of Pathology , Division of Gynecologic Pathology
University of Leipzig
GERMANY


Introduction
As mentioned above by Dr. Shih (Part 1-Introduction), the intermediate trophoblast (IT) can be divided into different types of intermediate (extravillous) trophoblastic cells based on their locations in normal early placentas. Various types of IT are associated with distinct tumors and tumor-like lesions, such as placental site nodule (PSN), exaggerated placental site (EPS), placental site trophoblastic tumor (PSTT) and the epithelioid trophoblastic tumor (ETT; Horn & Bilek 1997). These entities which are also recognized by the recent WHO classification (Genest et al. 2003), will be briefly discussed.

Placental Site Nodule (PSN).
The majority of PSNs are incidental findings in uterine curettages, cervical biopsies, hysterectomy specimens or in tubal ligation specimens in patients at their reproductive ages (Huettner & Gersell 1994). More than 50% of PSNs are clinically associated with dysfunctional uterine bleeding (Baergen 1997, Shih et al. 1999). Most often, PSNs are small, microscopic lesions. When grossly visible, they present as yellow, tan, or hemorrhagic nodules measuring up to 1 cm in diameter and located superficial at the affected site (most often in the lower uterine segment) and might be single or multiple lesions. On microscopy, the PSN is characterized by a well-circumscribed and lobulated border, sometimes accompanied by chronic inflammation or decidual cells. The intermediate trophoblastic cells are arranged in nests, cords or singly and are embedded in abundant eosinophilic extracellular matrix with a pale-pink appearance on low power. The cells vary in size and many have relatively small uniform nuclei but others are large with mononucleate, irregular, and hyperchromatic nuclei which might suggest a "polymorphic lesions". But, mitoses are always absent and the Ki-67 labeling index in placental site nodules is < 5% (Shih & Kurman 2001).

The main differential diagnoses include decidual cells, the ETT, PSTT and squamous carcinoma of the uterine cervix (Horn & Vogel 2004). Decidual cells are negative for cytokeratin but react positive against vimentin on immunohistochemistry. The ETT and PSTT represent clinically as tumorous lesions, are more cellular and represent distinct vascular alterations (see below). Immunoreactivity for HLA-G, inhibin- a and cytokeratin 18 and a low (~5%) Ki-67 labeling index also support the diagnosis of placental site nodule but not a cervical squamous carcinoma (Singer et al. 2002). By contrary, cervical carcinomas are always positive for p16-staining. In general, the PSN is a benign non-neoplastic lesions. Neither local recurrence nor progression to persistent GTD has been documented. Therefore, no specific treatment or follow-up is necessary for this lesion.

Exaggerated Placental Site (EPS).
This lesion is considered as a normal variation of a normal placental site. Formerly, it was termed syncytial endometritis (Marchand 1895) and benign chorionic invasion. The EPS shows an exuberant number of normal-appearing intermediate trophoblastic cells at the placental site. The intermediate cells are smaller and less atypical than placental site trophoblastic tumor and mitoses in the trophoblastic cells in the implantation site are absent. As in placental site trophoblastic tumor, the EPS represents trophoblastic invasion of the underlying endometrium as well as the myometrium. In most cases, the mononuclear intermediate trophoblastic cells are intermingled by a large number of multinucleated trophoblastic cells of the intermediate type, as seen at normal placental implantation site. Endometrial glands may be surrounded by the trophoblastic cells of the EPS, but are not destroyed. The occurrence of trophoblastic cells in the lumina of spiral arteries should not be considered as an indicator for PSTT. In almost all cases the EPS is accompanied by placental villies (Horn & Vogel 2004), which is a hallmark in the differential diagnosis to PSTT. On immunohistochemistry, the cells of the EPS represent an identical profile as the PSTT. The Ki-67 labeling index is near 0% (Shih & Kurman 2001). On small biopsies or curettings, EPS can be misdiagnosed as choriocarcinoma or PSTT (Menczer et al. 1999, Nigam & dass 2003). For differential diagnosis see below.

In general, the EPS does not have clinical significance. But, complete hydatidiform moles are sometimes associated with exaggerated placental site. In those cases, the close follow up of the patient with sequential HCG-measurement, as usually done in CHM, is strongly recommended. Placental site trophoblastic tumor (PSTT). This is a relatively uncommon lesion and was formely termed syncytioma, atypical choriocarcinoma, chorionepitheliosis and trophoblastic pseudotumor (Marchand 1895, Kurman et al. 1976, Hassadia et al. 2005). Contrary to the choriocarcinoma, the PSST occurs mostly after regular pregnancies or spontaneous abortions. In general, most PSTTs represent as tumorous lesions, projecting into the uterine cavity or predominantly involving the myometrium (sometimes up to the uterine serosa). The sectioned surface is soft, tan and, contrary to choriocarcinoma, contains only focal areas of hemorrhage or necrosis.

PSTT is generally not associated with the presence of chorionic villi. The cells of the PSTT are similar to cells in a normal placental site. The large and polygonal tumor cells infiltrate deep into the myometrium and insinuate themselves between smooth muscle fibers (dissecting growth pattern). There is no destruction of the endometrial/myometrial cells. PSTT represents an unique pattern of vascular invasion. This pattern of vascular invasion involves intermediate trophoblastic cell replacement of the muscular wall followed by fibrinoid material deposition in the vessel wall, which typically maintains a central lumen. These transformed vessels appear as pink, sometimes irregular shaped rings at lower power. Similar to implantation site intermediate trophoblastic cells (see above), PSTT is diffusely positive for cytokeratin (AE1/AE3 cocktail and cytokeratin 18), HLA-G, hPL and Mel-CAM (CD146), but rarely positive for beta-hCG (but, single positive cells occur in almost all PSTT) and p63. The Ki-67 labeling index is significantly elevated (> 10%) in PSTT (Shih & Kurman 2001). The detailed immunohistochemical profiles of PSTT and their application in differential diagnosis will be discussed in Part-4 (see below).

The differential diagnosis of PSTT includes exaggerated placental site (EPS), choriocarcinoma (CCA), epithelioid trophoblastic tumor (ETT) and epithelioid smooth muscle tumors. The most difficult differential is that of EPS. Features that favor a diagnosis of PSTT include the occurrence of a tumorous lesion, the absence of chorionic villi, unequivocal mitotic figures, a relatively small amount of multinuclear giant cells (of intermediate trophoblastic type), Ki-67 labeling index >5%. Contrary to CCA, PSTTs lacks confluent and prominent hemorrhages, Ki-67 labeling is not exceeding about 30-50%,. There are no syncytiotrophblast-like multinucleated giant cells with strong positive staining with HCG, and no so called biphasic growth pattern (i.e. a close admixture of mononucleated zytotrophoblastic cells and syncytial giant cells). PSTT are negative for vimentin, muscular and melanocytic markers (beside of CD 146; Shih & Kurman 2001). Sometimes PSTT can be confused with squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix, especially on small biopsies (Horn et al. 1997). But, the latter one is negative with CK18, HPL and CD 146, but positive against high molecular weight cytokeratines and p16 and shows a Ki 67-labeling index of more that 80% in the most cases. For ETT see below.

The majority of PSTT (about 85%) represent a benign behavior. But it is difficult to predict the behavior since it has been demonstrated that no close correlation exists between clinical outcome and molecular or morphological markers. Factors which may associated with malignancy are patients age > 35 years, last pregnancy event >2 years, highly polymorphic cells, large amount of cells with a clear cytoplasm within the tumor large necroses, destructive growth pattern, mitotic count of >5 MF/10 HPF (Chang et al. 1999; Feltmate et al. 2001, Baergen et al. 2006). Despite the low level of serum b -hCG in patients with PSTT, it is still the best marker available to monitor the course of the disease (Horn et al. 2003).

Epithelioid trophoblastic tumor (ETT). Epithelioid trophoblastic tumor is a rarest form of gestational trophoblastic disease and related to cells in the chorion leave (fetal membrane; Shih & Kurman 1998). ETT might be associated with any gestational event in younger women, but can also be diagnosed more than 10 years after the last known pregnancy or in postmenopausal women. Macroscopically, ETT almost always presents as a discrete, expansile nodule in the endomyometrium or in the lower uterine segment. The cut surface of the tumor is solid, often with cystic areas, and brown-tan with areas of hemorrhage and necrosis. Sometimes calcification might occur.

Microscopically, the ETT is composed of a relatively uniform population of mononucleate trophoblastic cells with an eosinophilic or clear cytoplasm surrounded by a well-defined cell membrane that are intimately associated with a geographical pattern of eosinophilic, fibrilary, hyaline-like material which may represent necrotic areas. Be aware that this dense eosinophilic material and necrotic debris can mimic keratin and may represent irregular calcification. The ETT show an average of 2 mitoses per 10 high power fields (range 0-9 mitoses). The architectural growth patterns include demarcated nodules, epithelioid cords and sheets. Within the tumor cell islands centrally located thin walled blood vessels with preserved vessels wall might be seen.

The immunohistochemical features are similar to those of chorionic-type intermediate trophoblast. Additionally, the ETT is positive for p63 and inhibin- a (Shih & Kurman 2004). The mean Ki-67 labeling index is 18% with a range from 10-25%. Beside PSTT and choriocarcinoma, the differential diagnosis of ETT includes squamous cell carcinoma (Coulsen et al. 2000, Hui et al. 2005). On immunostaining, the ETT reacts positive against cytokeratin 18, inhibin-alpha and HLA-G; SCC of the cervix will be negative. Vice versa, cervical carcinomas stain positive with p16; the ETT does not. The nodular expansile (not infiltrative !) growth pattern, the presence of geographic necrosis and calcification favor the diagnosis of ETT versus PSTT or choriocarcinoma. Furthermore, the monomorphic growth pattern of epithelioid trophoblastic tumor contrasts with the biphasic pattern of choriocarcinoma. Contrary to epithelioid smooth muscle tumors, vimentin and muscle markers are negative in ETT.

The behavior of epithelioid trophoblastic tumor is still unclear at time. Although the serum hCG level is only mildly elevated in most sequential measurement is recommended during follow up.

References
  1. Horn LC, Bilek K. Histologic classification and staging of gestational trophoblastic disease. Gen Diagn Pathol 1997; 143: 87-101

  2. Genest DR, Berkowitz RS, Fisher RA, Newlands ES, Fehr M. Gestational trophoblastic disease. In: Tavassoli FA, Devilee P (eds.): World Health Organization Classification of Tumors. Tumors of the breast and female genital tract. IARC Press, Lyon, 2003, pp. 250-254

  3. Huettner PC, Gersell DJ. Placental site nodule: A clinicopathologic study of 38 cases. Int J Gynecol Pathol 1994; 13: 191-198

  4. Baergen R. Trophoblastic lesions of the placantal site. Gen Diagn Pathol 1997; 143: 143-158

  5. Shih IM, Seidman JD, Kurman RJ. Placental site nodule and characterisation of distinctive types of intermediate trophoblast. Hum Pathol 1999; 30: 687-694

  6. Shih IM, Kurman RJ. The pathology of the intermediate trophoblastis tumors and tumorlike lesions. Int J Gynecol Pathol 2001; 20: 31-47

  7. Horn LC, Vogel M. Gestational trophoblastic disease. Non-villous forms of gestational trophoblastic disease. Pathologe. 2004; 25: 281-291

  8. Singer G, Kurman RJ, McMaster M, et al. HLA-G immunoreactivity is specific for intermediate trophoblast in gestational trophoblastic disease and can serve as a useful marker in differential diagnosis. Am J Surg Pathol, 2002; 26: 914-920

  9. Hassadia A, Gillespie A, Tidy J, Everard R G N J, Wells M, Coleman R, Hancock B. Placental site trophoblastic tumour: clinical features and management. Gynecol Oncol. 2005; 99: 603-607

  10. Menczer J , Livoff A, Malinger G, Girtler O, Zakut H . Exaggerated placental site erroneously diagnosed as non-metastatic trophoblastic disease. A case report. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 1999;20(2):115-116

  11. Nigam S, Dass R. Exaggerated placental site reaction mimicking choriocarcinoma. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2003 Jun;82(6):587-588

  12. Marchand F. I. Ueber die sogenannten "decidualen" Geschwülste im Anschluß an normale Geburt, Abort, Blasenmole und Extrauterinschwangerschaft. Monatsschr Geburtsh Gynaekol 1895; 1: 513-563

  13. Kurman RJ, Scully RE, Norris HJ. Trophoblastic pseudotumor of the uterus: An exaggerated form of „syncytial endometritis" simulating a malignant tumor. Cancer 1976; 38: 1214-1226

  14. Horn LC, Göretzlehner G, Dirnhofer S: Placental site trophoblastic tumor (PSTT) initially misdiagnosed as cervical carcinoma. Pathol Res Pract 1997; 193: 225-230.

  15. Chang YL, Chang TC, Hsueh S. Prognostic factors and treatment for placental site trophoblastic tumor: Report of 3 cases and analysis of 88 cases. Gynecol Oncol 1999; 73: 216-222

  16. Feltmate CM, Genest DR, Wise L, Bernstein MR, Goldstein DP, Berkowitz RS. Placental site trophoblastic tumor: a 17-year experience at the New England Trophoblastic Disease Center . Gynecol Oncol. 2001; 82: 415-419.

  17. Baergen RN , Rutgers JL , Young RH , Osann K , Scully RE . Placental site trophoblastic tumor: A study of 55 cases and review of the literature emphasizing factors of prognostic significance. Gynecol Oncol. 2006; 100: 511-520

  18. Horn LC, Vogel M, Bilek K, Einenkel J. Gestational trophoblastic disease – a review. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilk 63 (2003) 1233-1245

  19. Shih IM, Kurman RJ. The pathology of the intermediate trophoblastis tumors and tumorlike lesions. Int J Gynecol Pathol 2001; 20: 31-47

  20. Shih IM, Kurman RJ. p63 Expression Is Useful in the Distinction of Epithelioid Trophoblastic and Placental Site Trophoblastic Tumors by Profiling Trophoblastic Subpopulations. Am J Surg Pathol, 2004; 28:1177-1183.

  21. Coulson LE, Kong CS, Zaloudek C. Epitheloid trophoblastic tumor of the uterus in a postmenopausal woman. Am J Surg Pathol 2000; 24: 1558-1562

  22. Hui P, Martel M, Parkash V. Gestational trophoblastic diseases: recent advances in histopathologic diagnosis and related genetic aspects. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2004; 128: 1039-1042